Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "FOX 5 New York" channel.

  1. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams.
    115
  2. He was threatened with a PERJURY charge.
    29
  3. If the law is against you, pound on the facts. If the facts are against you, pound on the law. If the facts and law are against you, call everyone else names.
    13
  4. He didn't merely "shoot". Call him what he is: KILLER.
    6
  5.  @oldbloke135  Good luck with appealing a case in which the person attempting the appeal REPEATEDLY VIOLATED court orders -- ESPECIALLY the REQUIREMENTS of discovery concerning his finances and assets.
    4
  6.  @SuperFlashDriver  None of that is true. And there's a clue, because facts and reality matter: Moscow is in Russia, not in the United States.
    3
  7. @@DenisMjolnir-wv5gh Absolutely false: Moscow is not in the United States.
    3
  8. It's all show for the superficial.
    2
  9.  @GamingWithNikolas  As are all the words before and after that word.
    2
  10. Giuliani had the opportunity to testify -- and present his "evidence". But he is continuing to lie that there IS "evidence". The contempt threat was because of the re-defaming of the plaintiffs.
    1
  11.  @nitromartini1422  Or with Popok of "Meidas Touch" who says he deals with the "intersection" of law and politics. It would be nice if he would omit the politics. But his and Ben's presentations are shockingly sloppy for lawyers.
    1
  12.  @nitromartini1422  If you have a specific criticism then post it. Otherwise cease blindly attacking the rule of law.
    1
  13.  connardcyndi1769  I'm jealous of nothing. I have an education in law. But note how Popok made an issue of the fact that Trump had a PAID EXPERT testify for the defense in the civil fraud case. He claims to be a trial lawyer; if so, then he knows that is not controversial; it is the NORM. He also DIDN'T mention that the PROSECUTION ALSO had a PAID witness testify (though they paid significantly less). If he were doing LAW on that point, he might have reported that PAID witnesses testified, on BOTH sides, and that that is the NORM. Instead he was not doing law on that point -- he was doing POLITICS. In contrast: "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. Further: if he and Ben argue that way before juries -- disorganized, and riddled with tangents away from the central issue/s, then they manage only to confuse jurors. KISS: "Keep it simple, stupid." If one wants to make a case to a jury -- or those who are law-illiterate, and all about politics, therefore incapable of distinguishing between the two -- one adheres to the central facts and law, without interjecting all sorts of tangential and irrelevant issues. One keeps it focused and simple. Want a contrast with what Popok and Ben are doing -- to see how PROFESSIONAL presentation of legal arguments WORK? -- then see the many former Federal prosecutors -- on such as MSNBC -- present facts and law arguments without obfuscating and confusing the issues by mishmashing politics and law. If one instead wants to be sloppy, the opposing counsel will exploit it to one's disadvantage. Essentially, they are little different than right-wing media, where "legal" opinions aren't provided by lawyers but instead by Republican politicians who are unknown as to expertise in LAW.
    1
  14.  @honoviglobalnetwork1423  Yo -- law-illiterate: Prosecution of a person who commits crimes is not "persecution" -- it is PROTECTING THE MAJORITY FROM THE CRIMINAL, and imposing the RESPONSIBILITY for the crime where it belongs: ON THE PERSON WHO COMMITTED THE CRIME. The same goes in civil law: if you injure another, you owe making them whole -- undoing the injury. If you REFUSE to do so, then you are taken to court and FORCED to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY. What you "argue" for is stupidity and chaos.
    1
  15.  @wasdwasdedsf  That didn't happen. You obviously know nothing about elections law, how elections work, or the FACT that there have been built-in protections against election fraud for CENTURIES. Look up the New Hampshire case of your right-wing anti-American hero James O'Keefe trying to prove how "easy" it is to commit voting fraud -- had his camera all ready to film it when his friend -- he set up his friend; he wasn't going to risk his own freedom -- got caught trying to vote illegally. The friend got caught before getting anywhere near the voting booth. Trump is a third-generation New York con-man and career criminal -- and you are a sucker begging to be lied to by him and his anti-American sycophants because too stupid to educate yourself against charlatans, let alone about how elections are actually conducted. The question remains, DUNCE: WHERE IS THE "EVIDENCE" THAT GIULIANI HA BEEN CLAIMING TO HAVE? If he has it, nothing prevents him providing it TO THE MEDIA. Instead, as he said to Arizona REPUBLICAN BOWERS: "We have lots of theories, but no evidence." And we have Giuliani ON VIDEO asserting -- "TRUTH ISN'T TRUTH!" Ask YOURSELF: is that a "TRUTH"?
    1
  16. He'd ben an embarrassment to himself if he weren't a sociopath.
    1
  17. He obviously attended -- and was graduated with highest honors from -- Trump University.
    1
  18.  @steviegbcool  When the goal is saving face?
    1
  19.  @steviegbcool  Actually not -- only those who have a PUBLIC RECORD of LYING, as does Giuliani. The several official investigations in REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED GEORGIA REFUTED the LIE that the election was stolen. AND REFUTED the lies against Ruby Freeman and her daughter. That means REPUBLICANS refuted the LIE that the election was stolen, and that Ruby Freeman and her daughter committed fraud. Those are the FACTS; FACTS MATTER.
    1
  20. That's a lie. But like a good little paranoid and lying Trump stooge, you want us to believe they crossed the border into the United States in order to get to Moscow, Russia. Get help -- there's a chance you can Stop the Stupid and thereby stop being a domestic enemy who rejects reason and the rule of law based thereon.
    1
  21.  @SuperFlashDriver  New York has the benefit of actual free and fair elections, and no dictators. You might compare, as example, the amount of gun violence in your cherished Red (the official color of Communism) state with that in New York. Or any other Blue (the color of calm) state. Unless, of course, you prefer random gratuitous gun violence to keep you on you paranoid about non-threats from nowhere near you and thereby on your toes. Texas is doing better than most currently -- see Uvalde.
    1
  22. A coward? Not at all -- he's never getting out of incarceration until his death. Entitled. Immature. Malinformed. Being an 18-year-old with unrealistic illusions is not mental illness.
    1