Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "People across New York react to Trump guilty verdict" video.
-
19
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BonRain8734 This is where your self-righteous fact-free ignorance breaks down:
There are right-wingers who swear by The Federalist, which they've never actually read, for their rejection of rule of law. And about which they actually know nothing. These are the facts:
1. CONGRESS makes the laws. Writings from OUTSIDE Congress, regardless by whom, are NOT LAW.
2. The Federalist papers were NEWSPAPER articles, and an admitted ADVERTISING campaign having the EXPRESS purpose of SELLING the Constitution.
3. There were 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention. THREE of them -- a very small minority -- wrote the Federalist articles.
On the OPPOSITE end of the 55 delegates were THREE ANTI-Federalists who REJECTED, and REFUSED TO SIGN, the Constitution. One of the three was Massachusetts Congressman Elbridge Gerry -- who invented "gerrymandering," which was a huge scandal in Massachusetts.
So The Federalist turns out to NOT be LAW, and was authored by THREE out of 55 delegates. And as the Constitution was ratified, the ANTI-Federalists LOST the argument.
You're suggesting there are "more" "corrupt" politicians but "forget" who they are, therefore we can conclude that your "more" don't exist. Because EVIDENCE matters. But, of course, you want to change the subject AWAY from the very specific fact that TRUMP is now a CONVICTED FELON -- a unanimous verdict based on EVIDENCE.
And that dishonest effort to change the subject is one short step short of the usual "they all do it" -- EVIDENCE for which is never produced.
Remember all the claims made by, as examples, Trump and Giuliani, that there are and they have MOUNTAINS of EVIDENCE that the election was stolen? And remember how they kept saying that over and over and over and over again -- and yet they have NEVER PROVIDED the "EVIDENCE" they so often CLAIMED to have?
NO ONE was PREVENTING them providing their "EVIDENCE" -- but they haven't provided ANY. And why is that? Because THEY DIDN'T AND DON'T have ANY EVIDENCE to back up that we know has all along been the LIE that the election was stolen.
Isn't it about time you fools, you DUPES, STOPPED repeating the "stolen election" LIE?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1