Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Top Democrat HUMILIATES Matt Gaetz with brutal smackdown" video.

He is not alone in taking on punks such as Gaetz and Gym Jordan.
21
It was difficult to rule on the "merits" when there were no merits.
20
"Law and order" is a slogan. It is not the same as justice.
6
He's a star among law-illiterate Trumpeters, and Republicans who want to undermine the rule of law. The issue is that Republicans reject the rule of law. It is that basic, and stark.
5
@russellm2555 Are you referring to the election law changes made by the state REPUBLICAN legislature 18-months before the election -- the constitutionality of which the REPUBLICANS only challenged AFTER the election? Are you paid to be stupid, or are you stupid for free? "Justice and the rule of law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. You're drowning in the sewer of political pornography fed you be anti-Americans who support domestic terrorism. Here's a question for you to answer: In most states where Trump LOST, all the down-ballot elections went to REPUBLICANS on the SAME ballot as Trump. How does election fraud affect only ONE candidate on the ballot when the voter votes once on the ENTIRE ballot? It doesn't. But let's look at the statistically insignificant amount of voter fraud that occurred: five voted illegally -- twice -- in Pennsylvania. All five were REPUBLICANS. There was one instance reported in Ohio: that was a REPUBLICAN elected official. Get the picture yet? -- it's been the same since at latest Reagan: That which REPUBLICANS do REPUBLICANS accuse OTHERS of doing in order to distract from that which REPUBLICANS do. And you fall for the REPUBLICAN LIES on the issue because YOU DON'T KNOW HOW ELECTIONS ACTUALLY WORK. As example, the propagandist leader of "Project Veritas" wanted to prove how easy it is to vote illegally. So he and his camera went to New Hampshire, and while he filmed, his friend tried to vote ILLEGALLY. He was CAUGHT before he got near the ballot box because ELECTION INTEGRITY PROTECTIONS have been built into the system FOR CENTURIES. If you stand for nothing, in terms of morality, you'll fall for the lies of every two-bit con-man who comes along. The question to ask yourself is why you were so easily suckered by so obvious a con-man as career criminal Trump.
2
@russellm2555 How about YOU being RESPONSIBLE by BACKING UP your UNEVIDENCED assertions instead of simply spewing pot-shots at the air? I followed the case: 1. The REPUBLICAN legislature implemented an election law change 18 months BEFORE the election. OBVIOUSLY the REPUBLICAN legislature believed -- or at least PRETENDED -- it was constitutional at the time. They had 18 months to figure out whether it was or not. They did nothing. 2. AFTER the election, which Trump LOST, the very same REPUBLICANS went to court claiming the law THEY WROTE and passed was unconstitutional. The Senate race was ON THE SAME BALLOT WITH TRUMP, as were all the down-ballot Republicans who WON. One person, on vote; one ballot.
2
@lifarasad8931 Doesn't convince me for a simple and obvious reason: he is a liar.
1
If it's useless, it is made so by such as Gaetz.
1
Rita 25 y.o - check my vidéó Gaetz was talking about Al Qaida on that point. But let's address his claims for what they were: that the cases should have been evaluated on grounds of "jurisdiction" and "standing". If one is in the right court -- meets to test of "jurisdiction" -- and has "standing" to sue -- but nonetheless files a meritless suit, the suit will be dismissed for lack of merit. That's why when he was shot down when he claimed the courts didn't address the merits, he switched to talking about "jurisdiction" and "standing". In view of the fact that the courts accepted the suits in the first instance, the threshold tests of "jurisdiction" and "standing" had already been successfully met. It was the lack of merit that got them dismissed. Gaetz was apparently graduated by a decent law school, but he's never actually practiced law.
1