Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "WION" channel.

An allegation is not a PROOF. And you provide NO EVIDENCE for your crackpot hatred.
5
@Luther Micheals False. There are times -- and this is one of them -- when one side is not only wrong, but is basing its wrong on a falsification of history.
4
@mahatmadutcheastcompany6726 Russia invaded Ukraine. That exposes RUSSIA, especially as the invasion is based upon Putin's falsification of history.
3
There isn't another side of the story: Putin invaded Ukraine in violation of international law. The mindless history-illiterates will proclaim their "objective" ignorance, as do you.
3
@marieconnor6707 Correct. Ukraine has petitioned to join NATO, but NATO requires reforms by Ukraine, especially as concerns corruption. An example is Ukrainian oligarchs subverting the country out of loyalty to Russia.
3
@ArunKumar-gi7rv Asshole: don't presume to know what Western media is and reports, or that the US citizenry approves of everything the US gov't does. The US is, however, a democracy, so we can criticize the gov't -- and even elect different officials to run the gov't. Try dissenting in Russia and you go to jail -- and worse. Attacking the West is not a rational or intelligent defense of Russia. The fact is that Russia invaded Ukraine for reasons different than Putin has been saying. All you're doing is making the "argument" that because the US has done wrong it's okay for Russia to do wrong. Get it through your provincial ignorance of the US and its citizens: some of us actually know history -- BOTH sides of the "coin" -- and speak out about it. At present, Putin is threatening NUCLEAR WAR; apparently you view that as "proper" because the US has done wrongs, regardless nowhere near that scale.
3
@ashes3800 It is high time history-illiterates ceased attacking NATO -- at the least WHILE IT IS BEING THREATENED WITH NUCLEAR WAR BY RUSSIA.
2
@ashes3800 NATO was in disarray UNTIL Russia invaded Ukraine. Get an education in the actual history: at the beginnings of WW II Russia and Hitler were allies. NATO was formed AFTER that as a defense of Europe -- and the United States -- against an imperialist and expansive Russia.
2
@edmundrussell6044 IN FACT, despite the existence to NATO, Russia has invaded other countries. As example, look at what Russia did to Czechoslovakia in 1968. You don't know the history so don't know what you're talking about.
2
@edmundrussell6044 Putin is responsible for Putin's decision to invade. And there is no way that NATO's containment of Russia was about "invading" Russia. All those facts mean is that Putin was about EXPANSION, but NATO was in the way -- as was the reason NATO was established. Keep in mind that at the beginning of WW II, Russia and Hitler were ALLIES. And note that NATO has never gone to war against any other country, including those who have chosen not to join NATO. And being vulnerable to Russia in order to "promote peace in the region" is not a tenable "argument" -- if, that is, you believe Ukraine has the sovereign right to choose its own future so long as it doesn't include invading other countries. NATO has essentially taken Ukraine's wish to join NATO under advisement; there are changes Ukraine MUST make before that would be approved by NATO.
2
@molderko Are you suggesting that Russia doesn't have arms? If so, then why is Putin threatening NUCLEAR WAR? You aren't being reasonable let alone objective about the history -- of which you're obviously ignorant -- or the actual facts: At the beginning of WW II Russia and Hitler were ALLIES. Research the mass murders against Jews committed by the Nazis in Ukraine and Belarus. The latter is shown in the RUSSIAN film "Come And See". The various Baltic states Russia dominated -- without the willingness of those states -- are STILL being threatened by Russia. Belarus, as example, has a Russia-imposed dictator in charge. So does Kazakhstan. NONE of which is the fault of NATO or the United States -- or any other country on the planet EXCEPT RUSSIA. Russia has been subverting those countries and imposing his choice of leaders on those countries for decades -- without NATO responding with such as sanctions. Why haven't you been complaining about that -- instead of blaming NATO for being a counter to Russia's expansionist ambitions? Are you a Russian who swallows Putin's falsifications of history?
2
@Rshn5 That makes no sense.
2
NEWS anchors DON'T MAKE SHIT UP! -- the report FACTS. She is doing nothing of the kind.
1
Uhuh, nope: the first person to be answering to the American people is TRUMP.
1
@molderko Let's all ignore the differences. NATO members voluntarily joined NATO. The Baltic states who were under Russian domination didn't choose to be.
1
@molderko Yep: Cuba is a neighbor on the Russian border, so no big difference.
1
@aarongeorge8914 NATO is the first line of defense of the United States in Europe. You really should learn the actual history before mouthing off in defense of Putin's Russia, which is in violation of international law. Ukraine has a right NOT to be invaded, and didn't ASK to be invaded -- and is not a member of NATO. NATO exists to protect Europe FROM RUSSIA based on the U.S.S.R.'s actions. At the beginnings of WW II Russia and the Germany Nazis were ALLIES. So Putin going off about "Nazis" is beyond a bit much.
1
@adrians7358 There are history-illiterates who confuse objectivity for factuality; and there are Russian trolls; and there are Trump supporters who can't see beyond the inside of his colon.
1
@edmundrussell6044 Get it through your head: research the Berlin Wall, which was built by RUSSIA to KEEP PEOPLE IN, NOT to keep people OUT. How about RUSSIA "only doing things that promote peace in the region"?
1
@cottonfromearsandeyesdepos287 And you believe Russia despite the fact it illegally invaded Ukraine and is committing genocide. Who is "intimidated? Fool: no one forced the east European nations -- they are INDEPENDENT of Russia --- to join NATO. They CHOSE to do so. Tell us: how much Russian territory has Ukraine invaded and annexed?
1
@cottonfromearsandeyesdepos287 Unlike the Soviet Union, the eastern European nations that joined NATO weren't FORCED to do so. Except, perhaps, because the history of the Soviet Union concerning its neighbors intimidates THEM.
1
@cottonfromearsandeyesdepos287 Compare the sizes of Latvis and Estonia, as examples, with the size of Russia. And the NATO members are not all equal in wealth and military power. And I see apologists whining that Russia, which has nukes, is "intimidated" because nations on its border also have militaries, even though they don't have nukes. Apparently Russia is such a quivering intimidated giant that everyone else must be disarmed so Russia isn't "intimidated" into invading and committing genocide.
1
Putin initiated the invasion. There aren't two sides to the cause. What lead to it is Putin's falsifications of history. NATO wasn't threatening Russia -- there were military forces on RUSSIA'S side of the border. The threat was "equal" until Putin invaded Ukraine. Omitted is the fact that Russia and Nazi Germany were allies at the beginning of WW II.
1
Putin is writing this channels script.
1
India has a position on the issue -- and it is as an ally of Russia.
1
There is NO "right" to use nukes. Stop carrying water for mass-murdering Putin.
1