Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Lawrence on why Biden was the big winner in New Hampshire" video.

Haley is using DEMOCRATIC criticisms of Trump against Trump. But she's also staunchly opposed to choice -- there are multiple videos -- ads -- of her saying that.
179
@DaddyHensei Yes -- as long as she loses in the end. And I'm certain Biden is prepared for either of them.
14
@paullowell3342 Citizenship in a democracy isn't only about freedom'; it is also about RESPONSIBILITY. "We the people" are required to pay our own way in the form of taxes. Those taxes pay the costs of "We the people" meeting our own needs as determined by "We the people" -- not by free-riding sociopaths -- YOU benefit from EVERYONE'S taxes -- who reject the Constitution and the fact that "We the people" -- it is RIGHT THERE IN THE CONSTITUTION -- are both the gov't, and the beneficiaries of the gov't meeting our needs. This is basic history and legal history: In a world exclusively of "divine right" monarchies and dictatorships, the Founders established a SELF-GOVERNING DEMOCRACY. The best word that applies to that is -- PROGRESSIVE. Or do you doubt that moving beyond monarchy and dictatorship is PROGRESS? In addition, that document, the US Constitution, includes the means to AMEND it in order to keep it up to date with changing times. That is why it is a living document. Get it through your selfish ignorance and false programming: it is TAXES that maintain the roads YOU USE. But if yours were the legitimate view, you, alone, would have to maintain the roads for your use. Can you afford that, reactionary pseudo-individualist?
5
The gov't is of, by, and for, "We the people". Thus the purpose of the gov't is to meet the needs of "We the people" as determined by "We the people" through "We the people's" elected representatives.
3
@paullowell3342 I have an education in law. And this is the principle distinction you need to grasp: "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- john Adams. The essence of democracy is ELECTIONS. And the US Constitution expressly stipulates that there SHALL be ELECTIONS. The United States is a representative democracy in which representatives, including the president, are democratically elected. Further: legislative process is democracy in action: debate, negotiation, consensus of the majority. As to taxation: These are the first three, and fifth, bills enacted by the first Congress: June 1, 1789. "An act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths." That is, oaths of office. July 4, 1789. "An act for laying a duty on goods, wares, and merchandises imported into the United States." TAXATION. July 20, 1789. "An act laying duties on tonnage." TAXATION. . . . .July 31, 1789. "An act to regulate the collection of duties imposed by law on the tonnage of ships or vessels, and on goods, wares, and merchandise." TAXATION. There were also various state and local taxes raised for state and local domestic purposes. You are not taxed to death; you simply believe you have the freedom to leech on the community while contributing nothing to it. Taxation funds gov't, and gov't services to "We the people," as required and authorized through democratically-elected representatives by "We the people". As other forms of taxation were seen to be needed, the Constitution was amended by the democratic approval of "We the people".
1
@vjsuxujrix9245 Es ever spew without a shred of EVIDENCE to back any of that up. Amazing how racists always call themselves out.
1
@justingilmore1225 "kennyparis1225" is a racist spewing racist rhetoric without any EVIDENCE to prove any of it. Mindless hate is gonna hate.
1
@stevekern7235 RFK, Jr. is mentally ill. He advocates AGAINST RFK's position.
1
@kennyparis8742 Where are the ACTUAL FACTS that you claim back up your law-illiterate racist spew?
1
@kennyparis8742 PUNK: if you are going to make an assertion, and claim that it is true, it is YOUR RESPONSIBILITY to do the WORK of backing it up with FACT -- EVIDENCE. You do none of that because, obviously, you don't understand the word RESPONSIBILITY, and the fact that citizenship in a democracy isn't only about your freedom and everyone else's responsibility. Come on, airhead: lecture us about "individual RESPONSIBILITY" -- but focus on YOURS.
1
@vjsuxujrix9245 None of that is fact. And having more than one account so you can post the same sewage is unethical, and a violation of youtube rules. So you violate the rules while asserting that others are required to obey the rules.
1
@vjsuxujrix9245 Are you an expert on immigration? If so, why do you forget that your ancestors were immigrants?
1
@kennyparis8742 It is YOUR responsibility to do the research and back up your assertion. But as a typical racist punk you expect everyone else to do your work for you.
1
@ynotttt Where is your EVIDENCE for that nonsense?
1
@Ashphinchtersayswhat Actually if one knows how to do research then they know how to use Google to do research. It's a dumbassed workman who blames the tool for his lack of skill.
1
@mf568 By buying into fascism and by doing so destroying your own rights?
1
@mammawlee And he isn't anything like his father. In fact, he is AGAINST his father's actual position. Some of us were of voting age at the time his father was alive and active. RFK, Jr. is seriously mentally ill; unbalanced.
1
@jybrokenhearted You mean the children kidnapped under Trump's fascist immigration policy that violates BOTH US and international immigration law?
1
@paullowell3342 1. The essence of democracy is ELECTIONS. 2. The US Constitution -- and YOUR STATE constitution -- EXPRESSLY STIPULATES that there SHALL be elections. 3. The United States, and every one of its states, is a democratic republic, a representative democracy. Those are the facts based on this principle: "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. You do not get to ignore and vitiate the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution by asserting white supremacist anti-Constitutionalism using words you do not understand, and citing to law you do not know.
1
@jybrokenhearted When have you ever been aware of what the Federal gov't does -- though you obviously oppose racial equality enforced by the Federal gov't against racist "states' rights" anti-Constitutionalism.
1
@bindiberry6280 Stupidity is stupid.
1
@Ashphinchtersayswhat Da, Comrade! Are you a BOT or a troll? What is known is that you have nothing of merit to offer except childish fact-free insult. I'd ask if you are paid to be stupid, or are stupid for free, but you're too stupid to understand the question let alone know the answer to it.
1
@dt1010-d For whom -- those who care about women's health? The issue isn't abortion; the issue is PROBLEM PREGNANCIES, the treatment for which in many cases is ONLY abortion. Haley has promised to sign a NATIONAL abortion ban.
1
@dt1010-d "BETTER choice" than what!? She is not a good choice at all. She is simply less pandering to the same anti-Americanism Trump feeds.
1
@patriciamcclanahan2114 Try it in English.
1
@ahantu She's a Republican.
1
@driftingwolf0 "I always find it funny that you all just blindly accept Biden or Trump without question". Mature adults do not accept ANYTHING without question. Nor do we demand fulfillment of the baseless fantasy that reality be perfect. Nor do we REJECT reality and the limitations imposed by the implacabilities of political circumstance and RESPONSIBILITY. The FACT is that Sanders and Trump were equally opposite EXTREMES, BOTH of whom alienate that majority -- which is MODERATE -- by INSULTING basic human intelligence, and projecting their respective corruptions onto those who are FOR RULE OF LAW and democracy. But tell us, maif: why is that the two pro-Russian dudes who supported the successful election of the pro-Russian ukrainian candidate for president ended up, respectively, running Trump's and Sander's campaign? And why that Ukranian election included hacked and stolen emails, and BOTH Sander's and Trump's 2016 campaigns included hacked and stolen emails? You are the usual Trumper: arrogant in your ignorance of law, history, and the responsibility of adhering to fact and truth. You want everyone to support alternatives that DO NOT EXIST based on your political ignorance about what is. You don't accept democracy, you want Trump's s brand of fascism under the delusion that YOU would be exempt from the DEMOLITION of rule of law and your RIGHTS. Trump has you uneducated twits suckered, and you're too stupid to know it.
1
@branevans3705 The right-wing Republican attacks on Social Security began before it was even law. And Social Security is a stand-alone budget/trust fund. It is not part of the regular general budget. So the Republican promises to "fix" it based on the lie that it is tied to the general budget relies on the electorate being ignorant of the fact that it is not connected to the general budget. The lies about it needing to be "fixed" -- the intent being to destabilize it, then use that as argument to privatize it -- began with Reagan.
1
@dawnmcmannis2551 Nope. Shes a Republican running for the nomination and attacking Trump with Democratic criticisms because Republicans don't have criticisms of him. And she denies the US has been and is racist -- as if slavery didn't happen. And she's anti-choice. And she's anti-"Big Gov't" -- i.e., anti-gov't-meeting-the-needs-of-"We the people" which requires TAXATION to pay the costs of meeting those needs. But in her view people of color don't exist therefore don't have needs.
1