Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Liz Cheney mocks Speaker Johnson for appearing at hush money trial" video.

  1. "God": "Thou shalt not commit adultery." Johnson: "Hold my beer."
    80
  2.  @myndgodandpsyche  Let's talk about problem pregnancies and the necessity of abortion to save women's fertility and lives.
    9
  3. He swore and oath to the CONSTITUTION, which includes separation of "religion" and gov't.
    5
  4. She is as relevant as the Constitution -- which Trumpers have never read, don't understand, and REJECT.
    4
  5. I remember that the Constitution is still, as it expressly stipulates, is still the SUPREME Law of the Land. And that the First Amendment stipulates that "religion" and gov't be separate. Remember when you used to claim to be a "Christian" with a straight face, but that your words and actions exposed that as being a lie?
    4
  6.  @myndgodandpsyche  Problem pregnancies have nothing to so with whether one is perceivedly "strong" or "week". SOME might call it "God's will". And those who do call it that tend to consider it "interfering" with "God's will" to actually SAVE the woman's life. The issue is medical science -- not determined, stubborn, commitment to stupidity at the expense of others.
    3
  7.  @SuperOdyss  "Thou shalt not lie against others." -- "God". Got that, law-rejecting fool?
    2
  8.  @SuperOdyss  Whenever a person claims to be a "Christian," I immediately compare that claim to their words and behaviors. "I can't believe what you say/Because I see what you do" -- Manfred Mann.
    2
  9. January 6th was, as the FOUNDERS defined the term, an insurrection. They charged, tried, and convicted insurrectionists for TREASON and sentenced them to DEATH.
    1
  10.  @intagphotovideo  Hillary was 100 per cent correct about Trump being owned by dictator Putin.
    1
  11. You trust those who stole her diary to NOT be liars?
    1
  12.  @michaelbriganti  I have an education in law. You have an "edumacashun" in misinformation. I'll try to make it really, really, really simple for you: 1. No right is absolute. Every right is inextricably entwined with RESPONSIBILITY, which LIMITS the exercise of rights because one DOES NOT have the right to violate OTHERS' rights. 2. The First Amendment SEPARATES "religion" from gov't. One has the right to choose whatever religion" one wants -- which includes the corollary right to be FREE of "religions" one DOES NOT choose. Thus one ALSO has the right to choose NO "religion". And this is how the Founders established that separation of "religion" and gov't: ___ From the North Carolina constitution adopted on December 18, 1776: "XXXI. That no clergyman, or preacher of the gospel, of any denomination, shall be capable of being a member of either the Senate, House of Commons, or Council of State, while he continues in the exercise of the pastoral function. . . . . "XXXIV. That there shall be no establishment of any one religious church or denomination in this State, in preference to any other; neither shall any person, on any pretence whatsoever, be compelled to attend any place of worship contrary to his own faith or judgment, nor be obliged to pay, for the purchase of any glebe, or the building of any house of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry, contrary to what he believes right, or has voluntarily and personally engaged to perform; but all persons shall be at liberty to exercise their own mode of worship:--_Provided_, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to exempt preachers of treasonous or seditious discourses, from legal trial and punishment." ___ From the constitution of Georgia adopted on February 5, 1777: "Art. LVI. All persons whatever shall have the free exercise of their religion; provided it be not repugnant to the peace and safety of the State; and shall not, unless by consent, support any teacher or teachers except those of their own profession." "Art. LXII. No clergyman of any denomination shall be allowed a seat in the legislature." ___ From New York constitution adopted on April 20. 1777: XXXIX. And whereas the ministers of the gospel are, by their profession, dedicated to the service of God and the care of souls, and ought not to be diverted from the great duties of their function; therefore, no minister of the gospel, or priest of any denomination whatsoever, shall, at any time hereafter, under any pretence or description whatever, be eligible to, or capable of holding, any civil or military office or place within this State. ___ Those provisions, and their equivalents in other state constitutions, eventuated in the First Amendment separation of "religion" and gov't. That's how the separation of "religion" and gov't works. Everyone has the same rights -- and the right NOT to have their rights violated by law-illiterate/rejecting bullies.
    1
  13.  @granmao33  Yes. And one of the sources for the Constitutional separation was Jefferson's "Religious Freedom" act, which is cited on his gravestone as his most positive contribution. His state was dominated by Catholics, but his law established a freedom of "religion" that allowed anyone to choose whatever "religion" they preferred. But also that one wasn't required to have a "religion". And, of course, there are limitations on the exercise of that right: no child molestation; no human sacrifice; no efforts to overthrow the gov't in effort, as example, to establish a single "religion" enforceable by gov't.
    1
  14.  @myndgodandpsyche  How bullying of you to impose your anti-science view on others. The ISSUE is problem pregnancies -- NOT abortion, which latter is the only means to resolve some problem pregnancies and save the fertility and lives of the woman consulting not with your "religion" or the gov't but her doctor. NOTHING in the Constitution or laws authorizes self-righteous nobodies such as you to meddle in others' PRIVATE medical decisions.
    1
  15.  @sqc1726  Who wrote the alleged "Documents" -- which you do not either identify or provide?
    1
  16.  @SuperOdyss  Either inform yourself of where the FOUNDERS put you subjectivists, or admit that you reject the rule of law: ___ From the North Carolina constitution adopted on December 18, 1776: "XXXI. That no clergyman, or preacher of the gospel, of any denomination, shall be capable of being a member of either the Senate, House of Commons, or Council of State, while he continues in the exercise of the pastoral function. . . . . "XXXIV. That there shall be no establishment of any one religious church or denomination in this State, in preference to any other; neither shall any person, on any pretence whatsoever, be compelled to attend any place of worship contrary to his own faith or judgment, nor be obliged to pay, for the purchase of any glebe, or the building of any house of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry, contrary to what he believes right, or has voluntarily and personally engaged to perform; but all persons shall be at liberty to exercise their own mode of worship:--_Provided_, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to exempt preachers of treasonous or seditious discourses, from legal trial and punishment." ___ From the constitution of Georgia adopted on February 5, 1777: "Art. LVI. All persons whatever shall have the free exercise of their religion; provided it be not repugnant to the peace and safety of the State; and shall not, unless by consent, support any teacher or teachers except those of their own profession." "Art. LXII. No clergyman of any denomination shall be allowed a seat in the legislature." ___ From New York constitution adopted on April 20. 1777: XXXIX. And whereas the ministers of the gospel are, by their profession, dedicated to the service of God and the care of souls, and ought not to be diverted from the great duties of their function; therefore, no minister of the gospel, or priest of any denomination whatsoever, shall, at any time hereafter, under any pretence or description whatever, be eligible to, or capable of holding, any civil or military office or place within this State. ___ Those provisions, and their equivalents in other state constitutions, eventuated in the First Amendment separation of "religion" and gov't. That the Constitution is EXPRESSLY_ the SUPREME Law of the Land - there is no other law equal to or higher than that.
    1