Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Meet The Press Broadcast (Full) - June 12" video.

  1. The gallows on the Capitol grounds prove premeditation.
    24
  2. Michael Cohen was the first to state that if Trump lost he wouldn't go peacefully.
    23
  3. AG Garland speaks softly but carries big indictments.
    16
  4.  @Coldpack13  He was correct: Trump didn't go peacefully. Even to the extreme that people died. You know who else is a witness to those facts? YOU. All you need do is believe your truth-telling eyes and ears.
    3
  5. So the Federal gov't will be using the taxes from all 50 states to fund mental health services in Teaxass where REPUBLICAN Abbott CUT funding of those state services by more than 200 million in order to fund border political photo ops.
    2
  6. Airheads who have no ethics "respect" Barr.
    1
  7.  @czgator9000  It's OBVIOUS you AREN'T PAYING ATTENTION: 1. The DOJ has INDICTED MULTIPLE "Proud Boys" and "Oath Keepers for SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY. 2. The DOJ has indicted the LEADING REPUBLICAN candidate for governor in Michigan for participating in the insurrection. AG Garland is a veteran DOJ prosecutor -- see OK City bombing -- and has been a judge. Despite all those who OBJECTED that BARR politicized the DOJ NOW putting POLITICAL pressure on the DOJ -- and I include Glenn Kirshner, who nonetheless knows better -- I have been confident in Garland's pursuit of justice, based strictly on the law and facts, since the outset.
    1
  8.  @Have_A_Nice_Day242  PAY ATTENTION: FACTS MATTER: we are ALREADY SEEING indictments. Some of those indicted for seditious conspiracy are COOPERATING. THEY will point UPWARD to those who were links between them and the Trump campaign and Trump. Key is, at the least, lifelong seditionist Roger Stone, who during the planning for the insurrection had "Proud Boys" as his personal "security.
    1
  9.  @frankrocco7989  Except, of course -- as you'd know if you paid attention to ACTUAL NEWS -- that numerous "Proud Boys" and "Oath Keepers have been indicted for seditious conspiracy, and some of those have "FLIPPED".
    1
  10. You obviously don't know the difference between opinion and evidence. Which is typical of illiterate Trump supporters: they make a bald-based assertion, without a shred of EVIDENCE, but believe that the bald-face assertion is by itself "proof" of the bald-faced assertion. What you don't "get" is that EVERYTHING the Committee states is BACKED BY EVIDENCE -- SOME of which they showed you RIGHT IN YOUR FACE. Will you CONTINUE to defend your ignorance when the Committee reveals the names of all the REPUBLICANS in Congress who asked Trump for PARDONS? The Committee would NOT be making that allegation if they DIDN'T have EVIDENCE for it. All the allegations of "irregularities" in the election were FALSE; the ISSUE is that those who BELIEVE those LIES are ignorant of HOW ELECTIONS WORK. As example, a Trump and his fellow LYING CO-CONSPIRATORS presented it, mail-in ballots were a new thing. IN FACT, REPUBLICANS have been touring and using mail-in ballots for OVER 50 years.
    1
  11.  @MM-vj4gc  Michael Cohen was the first to predict that, if Trump lost the election, then Trump wouldn't go peacefully. And Trump didn't go peacefully. So Cohen's prediction on that point was proven TRUE. I accept truth, when it is truth, regardless source. As well, when he testified UNDER OATH, he provided HARD EVIDENCE to back up his statements. John Dean did his time, without complaint, and subsequently vindicated himself. But unlike Cohen he was not a hatchet man. So it will take a significantly longer, if ever, for Cohen to entirely vindicate himself.
    1
  12. @Mark Victor Proves they took the time to measure and cut the lumber, and do a trial-assembly, before bringing it to the Capitol where it was reassembled. In short, dunce, it was not "spontaneous"
    1
  13. Other democracies have prosecuted their presidents. Is the US as good as those countries while claiming to be the greatest of them?
    1