Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "CBS Boston" channel.

  1. "Rise off the Moorons".
    32
  2. "Rise of the Moorons" DELIBERATELY create confusion by asserting all sorts of nonsensical gibberish based on the "sovereign citizen" rejection of the rule of law.
    19
  3. Yes, I'm certain you're an expert on higher education and freedom of thought, belief, and speech.
    12
  4.  @trinade3732  It's quite possible her husband and or family sought a lawyer with relevant experience. The only facts you know are those presented in open court. All else is not known to you.
    8
  5. Gaza is an open prison maintained by Israel.
    6
  6.  @sirbey9608  JACKASS: there was no "Moorish" EMPIRE outside Africa.
    6
  7. The gov't, moron, is "A system of laws, and not of men". -- John Adams. They EXPRESSLY reject the rule of law; the gov't is BY DEFINITION the RULE OF LAW. Criminals always bullshit themselves that they can successfully bullshit their way around the rule of law. They always FAIL because the law has seen and dealt with all their kinds of bullshit many times before.
    5
  8. Yep: that's why all the heavy weapons.
    5
  9. Beginning with his own intelligence.
    5
  10. REJECTing the rule of law, which these moorons do, is BY DEFINITON anti-gov't, becuase the gov't IS the rule of law.
    5
  11. The moorons reject Federal law -- except the Second Amendment, which is Federal Law. And, of course, reject any other state laws of whicch they "disapprove," such as Massachusetts gun control law.
    4
  12.  @TheSacredGrove  So you oppose anyone expressing views you don't like? Isn't that the same as Fascist?
    4
  13. They should have filled their gas tanks in Rhode Island, then they wouldn't have run out of gas on the way.
    4
  14.  @evergreen_g7  And violated a slew of Massachusetts gun laws, and Federal law, in doing so. They also don't have permits to posses guns, which is another violation. Which suggests the guns are illegal.
    4
  15. Protecting whose country? Our democracy is based on the rule of law. He REJECTS the rule of law.
    4
  16.  @Tocinos  You are not smearing a "Boomer". You are responding to a relatively young individual who is ignorant of the nature of education in a democracy and knows nothing about higher education.
    4
  17. Another law-illiterate heard from. Constitutional provisions are implements by STATUTES. And the subject of the Second Amendment is WELL-REGULATED MILITIA. Neither "Rise of the Moorons" nor you are a militia, or in a militia, which is UNDER BOTH Federal and state constitutions and laws. . LICENSING is for the protection of public health and safety -- which is larger and more important than your individual willingness to endanger them.
    4
  18. He allegedly had plans to establish a business. When that failed he took up "studying law" -- i.e., pseudo-law JUNK on the Internet. The basis of his "view" is many decades old: "sovereign citizen," which is a rejection of the rule of law -- which is what criminals do. And now he is headed to being a convicted criminal prohibited having guns.
    3
  19. "Rise of the Moorons" REJECT United States law -- which is the Constitution, AND the Second Amendment, AND treaties, AND the laws IMPLEMENTING the Constitution. Basic LOGIC: one cannot claim BOTH to be EXEMPT from the rule of law, AND that the rule of law is the basis for that exemption. Law -- not law-illiterate criminal gibberish.
    3
  20. He and his anti-gov't gang violated a slew of state and Federal laws. They are headed for convictions as felons, which will result in their being prohibited possessing guns. It has nothing to do with race -- except, perhaps, for "Rising of the Moorons".
    3
  21. It will be. Andthey need to be hit hard to send the message to other CRIMINALS who have similar ideas.
    3
  22. But not the Palestinian victims of Israel's collective punishment?
    2
  23. They don't have to ADMIT being "sovereign citizen" dupes; they assert the basics of it: that they are outside and above the law; that they don't need licensing for anything; that the courts have no jurisdiction over them. And added a few more layers of nonsensical gibberish on top of that. Anyone who has researched their gibberish recognize it for the "sovereign citizen" criminal rationale it is. They violated a slew of FEDERAL and state gun control laws -- SERIOUS FELONIES. "Rise of the Moorons".
    2
  24. As a citizen in the United States, one is a sitizen of the United States, and a citizen of the state in which one resides. Ever hear of "states rights"? -- separate set of laws. The subject of the Second Amendment is well-regulated militia. A militia is not an individual. And to make the point conclusively: the first three wrods of the Constitution are, "We the people," not, "We the individual". In short: you are a law-illiterate asserting a false slogan.
    2
  25. All hogwash. The "Rise of the Moorons" occupied an abandoned building -- but LEAVE OUT that the bank that OWNS the building is suing them. LISTEN to what he said: the "laws of the United States" (except for the LIES against the Second amendment) do not apply to him. He REJECTS the rule of law. That's why no FIDs -- which is a violation of Federal and state laws. You know nothing about "the laws of the constitution". Your crackpottery won't survive the slew of violations of CRIMINAL law you bullshitted yourself into.
    2
  26. The basis of their claim to be exempt from the rule of law is straight out of the "sovereign citizen" criminal rationale.
    2
  27. He violated a slew of both Federal and state CRIMINAL laws. And he is headed for felony convictions for doing so. And in addition to jail-time he will be prohibited possessing guns.
    2
  28. If they were "white conservatives," they would still be in felony violation of Federal and state laws. They have their equivalents in "sovereign citizen" white supremacists.
    2
  29.  @The-LongRoad-Home  What in hell are you talking about, white majority "victim"?
    2
  30.  @nunzionapoli6325  The Second Amendment is the FOURTH of FOUR Militia Clauses in the Constitution. The ENTIRE Constitution is in effect at the same time. Recommend your read it for the first time in your life. Focus on Art. I., S. 8., C. 15 & 16. In short, law-illiterate, LEGITIMATE militia are UNDER the law, not criminal felons opposed to the rule of law.
    2
  31.  @JoseContreras-mv5yz  It's more complicated than that. As example, the Second Amendment applies to the ste's WELL-REGULATED, under BOTH US and state constitutions and laws, the commander-in-chief of which is the state's GOVERNOR. AND, the ARMING of the state's Militia is by CONGRESS. Did CONGRESS "arm" these moorons via the state's gov't/Militia/National Guard of which they are NOT members?
    2
  32.  @nunzionapoli6325  Gun control laws exist to portect the health and safety of the public. There is no individual "right" to endanger those, any more than there is an individual 'right" to be a criminal.
    2
  33. UNDER LAW, the January 6 attack on the Capitol -- and many were ARMED -- was an INSURRECTION, which the Founders classifed as TREASON, and sentenced the insurrectionists to DEATH. See "Shays's" and "Whiskey" insurrections -- the latter of which was SUPPRESSED by LEGITMATE well-regulated Militia, lead by George Washington, AFTER the Second Amendment was ratified.
    2
  34. They ARE NOT a "militia". READ the Constitution, ALL of which is in effect at the same time -- "Art. I., S. 8., C. 15. The Congress shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute [ENFORCE] the Laws of the Union, [and] SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS". "Art. I., S. 8., C. 16. The Congress shall have Power To provide for orrganizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia". Did they get their guns from Congress, via state gov't/militia/National Guard, as enlistees or draftees into the National Guard? All the so-called self-anointed "militia" are in fact extralegal anti-govt insurrectionists who ALSO reject the rule of law, beginning with the Constitution, EXCEPT for the LIES about the Second Amendment.
    2
  35. The gov't is BY DEFINITION the RULE OF LAW. They REJECT the rule of law. LISTEN to them: they SAY EXACTLY THAT.
    2
  36.  @GH-oi2jf  Just listen to THEM: they CLEARLY STATE that they REJECT the rule of law.
    2
  37.  @MrMuunkuunda  They are ANTI-CIIZENSHIP of the United Stats -- which means they REJECT the RULE OF LAW. And they IGNORNED the fact that both Federal and Massachusetts state laws govrn possession of guns, thus have NO Federal or state license or permit to possess deadly weapons -- which is one or more CRIMINAL FELONIES.
    2
  38.  @alexisS98  In both directions. Sometimes they get it wrong in benefit of the patient; sometimes they get wrong adverse for the patient. There is a problem with routinely throwing "meds" on people and doing nothing more than that but calling it "therapy".
    2
  39. Exactly. Their claims are psuedo-law gibberish.
    2
  40.  @annabellelee4535  University degrees prepare one for jobs if one gets a degree specific to a career. Those who say otherwise are repeating the Republican propaganda by which they've been attacking education -- which is an advantage -- since Regan. But university education that prepares one for a profession means constantly keeping up to date in the profession. I do get tired of people who've never been to university actually believing they are experts on the topic -- but they are always obvious: they present EXCUSES for NOT attending university.
    2
  41.  @tomhenry897  Another who has never attended university, so is totally ignorant about higher education, and all of that based on a rejection of education since he was taught by his parents to reject education.
    2
  42. Netanyahu has declared a policy of COLLECTIVE PUNISHMENT against Gaza, which began by cutting off all food, water, and electricity to Gaza, all of which must pass through Israel. Because Hitler used collective punishment against the Jews during WW II it was declared a WAR CRIME.
    2
  43.  @evergreen_g7  He DOES NOT know law, else he'd know that no matter what bullshit gibberrish he asserts about being "beyond the reach of the law," he is NOT. No one is above the law, including self-bullshitted moorons.
    2
  44. A health care professional at MGH was recently arrested for several rapes of male patients at MGH. Health "care," behind the mask of "care," is not what it is clamed to be.
    1
  45.  @dawidewi  Because it IS.
    1
  46.  @nunzionapoli6325  A Susan Collins state.
    1
  47. Which is a self-negating claim.
    1
  48.  @techwatch1228  Another racist moon heard from.
    1
  49. The "emails from around the world" are inadmissible.
    1
  50.  @synewparadigm  You've never seen bogus anti-Palestinian propaganda that you didn't like.
    1