Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Extra Time: Serial killer researcher on Gilgo Beach murder suspect" video.

  1. The police reported that the bodies were intact -- which means not dismembered.
    7
  2.  @Eshanas  I'm no expert; the problem is that this guy is presented as an expert on serial killers, and yet he gets that basic fact wrong. So how "expert" is he?
    2
  3. Except that he isn't. According to those actually involved in the case, the victims tied to the suspect were INTACT. But according to this "expert" -- who is not involved in the case -- the victims were "dismembered". INTACT means NOT "dismembered". USE YOUR HEAD: FACTS MATTER.
    2
  4. You've already got him convicted; and you aren't LISTENING. According to the police dealing with this specific issue the bodies of those they've tied to him were INTACT. According to this "expert" -- who is not involved in the case -- the victims were "dismembered". INTACT means NOT "dismembered".
    2
  5. That's quite a fantasy. Where are your FACTS?
    2
  6.  @ronnynoneofyourbusinessgoo7892  He's 6 feet 9 inches tall. So, yes, he "sticks out like a sore thumb".
    2
  7.  @Ms.Norths.Musings  It's a possibility -- but not yet established as a fact. That means the "expertise" of the "expert" in the video is subject to skepticism.
    1
  8. Misleading: those investigating the case said that the bodies of the victims tied to this suspect were INTACT -- which means NOT "dismembered".
    1
  9. Even if innocent?
    1
  10.  @MakeupMobster  There may be very loose categories in which serial killers are placed. Or there may not be. But it is certain that there is no single profile, so no "cookie cutter" anything.
    1