Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Hillary Clinton Legally SHUTS DOWN Fox News Propaganda" video.

I'm all for Hillary suing FOX for defamation. I'd only ask why it's taken so long.
17
WITHOUT evidence you conclude that she isn't "squeaky clean"!? Because constantly-lying Republicans SAY so WITHOUT A SHRED OF EVIDENCE!? PAY ATTENTION: Hillary was "investigated" for 30 years, based on FAKE "scandals," by Republicans. Take as example the fake Benghazi "scandal": she didn't need to be subpoenaed, and she has never pled the 5th. And the day she announced her candidacy for president she released THIRTY YEARS of tax returns. While both Sanders and Trump persisted in their own serial lying about releasing theirs. Your boy Trump's son pled the 5th more than 500 times during ONE deposition. And his father will at least match that number. Even though Trump himself repeatedly said only "the mob" and "the guilty" plead the 5th. When do you choose to believe him, and when do you choose not to believe him?
2
@jon9103 It's false, that's "how so". The bar is high for public figures to sue for defamation. But if they can prove MALICE all bets are off. And FOX hate-propaganda is constant malice.
1
She's also a lawyer.
1
@marlenemurray8261 "Isn't as bad as"!? Faint praise. Note that Hillary testified for at least 11 hours about "Benghazi"-- without having to be subpoenaed, and never pled the 5th. The same goes for her testimonies in the various fake "scandals" flung at her by Republicans. Stop even entertaining smears that have NO EVIDENCE to back them up.
1
Because Biden doesn't have dementia; he has a STUTTER. And YOU aren't qualified to diagnose your own stupidity, gullibility, and bigotry, let alone distinguish between facts and bullshit. How many close to the Clintons have "come up dead"? None. How many close to Trump have been indicted and convicted of CRIMES? The count is continuing. Hold in mind the fact that Trump repeatedly said that only the "mob" and "the guilty" plead the 5th for when Trump pleads the 5th, like his sone Eric already has.
1
@trekmontana77 You haven't any money with which to bet: you got suckered out of it by Trump.
1
@trekmontana77 Trump was elected with the help of Putin and Sanders -- and Sanders' moronic "fans" who preferred the allegedly-"progressive" outlier Sanders. Sanders, who engaged in the same serial lying about releasing his tax returns as Trump, vowed to destroy the DEMOCRATIC Party -- that allowed him to run as a Democrat -- not the REPUBLICAN Party, and refused to concede and continued to trash the Party and Hillary after HE LOST THE PRIMARY -- to the PROGRESS of electing the first woman president.
1
@trekmontana77 Discovery works in BOTH directions. As for Hillary not being "squeaky [clean]"? On what "evidence" do you base that presumption -- FOX hate-propaganda?
1
@trekmontana77 Still lying against the facts: 1.Sanders and Trump had "fans". And they responded in exactly the same way to criticis of their "idols": by avoiding the criticism and attacking the critic. 2. Sanders smeared Hillary with RIGHT-WING lies -- but Hillary did not attack Sanders so as not to alienate his "fans". 3. Sanders continuously trashed the DEMOCRATIC Party -- even after the Party graciously acceded to his request to run as a Democrat. 4. Sanders ALLIENTATED BOTH actual Democratic voters, and "centrists" by smearing "centrists" as "corrupt". THAT is how he lost the primary. 5. But let's dig in: Paul Manafort and a partner successfully supported the pro-Russian candidate in Ukraine. That campaign included hacked emails. Paul Manafort's next campaign was Trump's. His partner's next campaign was Sanders'. Shortly into the Sanders campaign it was busted for hacking the DNC, and Manafort's partner resigned. 6. And as noted before: Sanders stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Trump with his own serial lying about releasing his tax returns. Hillary's taxes were never an issue: the same day she announced her candidacy she released THIRTY YEARS of tax returns. And still you assholes avoid the facts about Sanders' BLOWING his own campaign -- even after LOSING he refused to concede and CONTINUED to trash the Party and Hillary -- by blaming everyone but Sanders for his own fuckings up. Perhaps someday you'll grow up and quit making excuses for being so politically illiterate that you ignored those known facts in order to help TRUMP get elected. Yes, neophyte: many Sanders "fans" turned around and voted for the opposite EXTREM: TRUMP. There was nothing "progressive" about Sanders' campaign -- or in voting against electing the first woman president -- which WOULD have been progressive.
1
@trekmontana77 The caps are for EPMPHASIS -- nothing "random" about them. Hillary has nothing to hide; even though you continue to imply otherwise without a SHRED of EVIDENCE.
1
@trekmontana77 Grow up: deal with the FACTS about SANDERS instead of irresponsibly avoiding those facts by dishonestly changing the subject. IN FACT, Hillary is very popular with ACTUAL Democrats. Hopefully someday you'll learn that being on the fringe is to permanently be in a minority.
1
You know nothing factual about Hillary. Wake up: silence is assent. When someone lies about you, and you say nothing, then you are perceived as agreeing that the lie is true.
1
@bernardgagnon1626 I'm responding INTELLIGENTLY to your comment.
1
@bernardgagnon1626 I have an excellent sense of humor. And when I use it it is obvious that it is that. You weren't joking; you were putting Hillary on the same level as Trump -- without a shred of actual legitimate EVIDENCE for doing so.
1
@bernardgagnon1626 As I substantiated, you typify Sanders' "fans"": you "distrust" Hillary Clinton based on UNSUBSTANTIATED smears against her, AND IGNORE SUBSTANTIATED criticisms of Sanders. You are as intellectually dishonest as Trump "fans": you don't care about facts or evidence. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. Perhaps someday you'll gain sufficient political awareness to be able to rise to that principle, and thereafter not smear people regardless total lack of evidence. As I noted, discovery works in BOTH directions. And as I summarized, Hillary Clinton has nothing to hide or worry about in that regard.
1