Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Arizona prosecutors can't find Rudy Giuliani. Here's where he may be" video.

RESPECT! GET HIS NAME RIGHT -- GYM Jordan.
55
@uonecar Your effort to change the subject is intellectually dishonest. Dishonesty is immoral, hypocrite.
25
@Parzival555 In the US we don't lock people up without first criminally charging, trying, and convicting them of the charges. But we understand your ignorance of that due process, Comrade.
22
In shackles.
10
@justininvestor You first. Alcohol is a drug. Giuliani is constantly drunk. And if Trump doesn't drink, then why is he always drunk on cheap whine?
4
@DrinkTheKoolAid62 I know that (I have an education in law). But if Giuliani is innocent, then why is he not rushing to court to clear his name, instead of dodging service?
3
I agree: in view of the fact that he hasn't done anything wrong, he's probably waiting at the court door for it to open for business so he can clear his name. It isn't that he's avoiding service, but that those trying to serve him are at the wrong location.
3
@barbarafaulder9087 Giuliani . . . hmm . . . wasn't he the coffee boy serving covfefe?
2
@franklinbishop7941 My request to respect him is totally superficial -- limited to calling him by his correct name: Gym Jordan.
2
@ThePhenom777 Ages ago.
2
@The_Red_Squirrel Certainly. But that isn't ultimately determined by the police. It is determined in the separate Judicial branch -- courts of LAW, where politics have no place. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. And it is certainly not determined by private citizens who deny the equal PROTECTION of the laws to others based on their law-illiteracy, rejections of rule of law, and racism.
1
@chucktaylor4958 When arrested one is typically put in a jail cell.
1
@The_Red_Squirrel In some states judges are elected. One is still able to "bracket" one's biases and be objective.
1
@chucktaylor4958 ALLEGED to have violated a law. Constitutional due process is premised upon PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE. There are people in jail, awaiting trial, because they can't afford bail -- and yet they are PRESUMED INNOCENT. The jury in a criminal trial does not determine whether the defendant -- who is presumed innocent -- is guilty or innocent. They determine whether the prosecution PROVED guilt -- but if not, the defendant is still innocent.
1
@The_Red_Squirrel Obviously the election of judges is a political process. That is why prosecutors who want to become elected judges make a big deal out of their rate of criminal prosecution successes. That can be based on convicting people who didn't deserve to be prosecuted in order to show a greater "successes" rate. I prefer nomination for judgeships, because then there is some scrutiny of the nominee.
1
@Cp3786 You aren't paying attention to reality.
1
@The_Red_Squirrel The extremists make it political.
1
@The_Red_Squirrel The bias is Trump's, not the judges'. The extremists base their nominations on bias -- see Trump's appointments.
1
@EspOcKeTzsJ That's one of the stupidest responses I've received this week. Instead of personal attack against someone I am not, how about addressing the issue instead of proving yourself an asshole?
1
@Cp3786 Your whistling past the graveyard desperation is causing you to repeat your talking to yourself.
1
@Khemith_Demon_Hours Hunter is suing FOX news for defamation and other violations, the EVIDENCE is MOUNTANOUS, and he will win MASSIVELY.
1
@StephanieBraet-g5h THE powerful INCLUDES TRUMP. Anyone else would have been in jail decades ago.
1
@justininvestor You go first.
1
@robainscough Has Giuliani taken up selling hair dye yet?
1
Certainly, as need be. But I guess Rudy "TRUTH ISN'T TRUTH!" Giuliani, LAW 'N ORDER mobster, realizes that adding a few more criminal charges isn't going to amount to much in the face of the long list of charges he's already facing.
1
Guiliani is a decades-long friend and co-corrupt with Trump. More police and firemen died on 9/11 because they had been provided walkie-talkies that couldn't communicate with each other as result of a corrupt deal made by Giuliani and Bernie Kerick. In addition, despite the warnings of anti-terrorism experts, he insisted that the New York City Police Command Center be put in one of the two towers. So he was running around the streets that day -- in search of cameras -- because he had no Command Center in which to command. The media invented fake news to portray him as a hero" and "Ameria's Mayor". None of that was true. And who was Bernie Kerick? He was Giuliani's chauffer for years; then Rudy appointed him New York City Police Commissioner -- apparently based on his driving skills. Kerick subsequently served prison time for corruption. Kerick is also a Trumper.
1
So "Law and Order" Giuliani is blowing off the rule of law. FORCE him to comply with due process, which is premised upon presumption of innocence.
1
He an Trump were decades-long friends and co-corrupts. Trump's Roy Cohn was a MOB lawyer who was eventually indicted and disbarred. Giuliani prosecuted the Italian Mafia -- but not the Russian Mafia living in Trump Tower.
1
@Repented008 Trump won't be re-elected.
1
@scottharrison8701 Let's be MATURE, shall we -- I'm sure you aren't so stupid and intellectually lazy that you CAN'T make the effort: If you are going to claim a statement is a "lie," then BACK UP YOUR CLAIM with EVIDENCE. Want to see Trump plead the 5th? -- se the excerpts from filmed depositions shown on MAINSTREAM media. FOX won't even tell you that it had to pay almost 1 billion dollars to Dominion Voting Systems for DEFAMING the corporation -- which is a reason Tucker Carlson was FIRED. And the DEFAMATION was PROVEN with DOCUMENTS -- emails, texts, even recordings -- from WITHIN FOX by Hannity himself and others. So TRY to be an ADULT with the ability to REASON and adhere to ACTUAL FACTS, EVIDENCE, and LAW -- In the New York criminal trial for BUSINESS RECORD FRAUD, committed in order to PROTECT THE CAMPAIGN, see the Michael Cohen invoice, requested and required by Trump book-fixer Allen Weaselberg -- who is currently serving a second sentence at Riker's Island for perjury. ON that invoice WEASELBERG ITEMIZED the amounts of money to be paid to Cohen, which when added together totaled $420,000. INCLUDED in that total was the amount of TAXES Cohen would have to pay for that which was FRAUDULENTLY represented as "income" for Cohen. Since when does YOUR employer pay YOUR taxes FOR you?
1
@uonecar Try reposting that in literate English. But THINK while you are doing that, because one of the main set of lies Trump utters is against immigrants. LOOK: Trump hates immigrants. Trump's wife is an immigrant.
1
@uonecar Actually I'm opposed to all war. But I'm also sufficiently realistic to recognize that sovereign Ukraine is being illegally invaded by Russia -- and you history-illiterates are defending Russia. LEARN: 1. For at least hundreds of years there were constant wars between western and Eastern European nations -- primarily, in Western Europe, between Britain, France, and Germany -- typically any two of them were allied against the third. 2. Twice such wars became world wars, and sucked the United States into their wars. (Do a search on youtube for "FrenchTastic" and "Normandy" for a video tour of the AMERICAN section of the D-Day cemetery in Normandy -- the cemetery Trump refused to visit because he didn't want his hair mussed by the very light rain). The AMERICAN section is acre after acre after acre after acre of white crosses -- each the grave of an AMERICAN service member -- Trump said that those who died for the country are "suckers" and "losers". The alternatives to those deaths was Hitlerian fascism. 3. NATO was established by the United States -- it is a treaty, which in keeping with the Constitution is part of the US Law of the Land; which means no president can withdraw from it -- for three basic reasons: A. To put a stop to the many hundreds of years of wars among Western and Eastern European nations -- and it has been a spectacular SUCCESS at that. B. To PREVENT the US being sucked into another world war a THIRD time. That too has been a success -- and it is US NATIONAL SECURITY. C. To established a mutual defense pact against historically-imperialist/expansive Russia. How in hell do you think Russia became the USSR!? It did so by FORCEFULLY SUBJUGATING the Baltic and Eastern European nations, including Ukraine. Now pay attention to the actual meaning of Putin's LIE that a NATO member being on the opposite side of the border from Russia is a "threat," which is his excuse for intending to invade, as example, Poland -- to eliminate the so-called "threat". And where would Russia be if it invaded, as example, Poland? It would have, on the opposite side of that border, a NATO member -- which he would claim is a "threat". So rinse and repeat the invasion excuse. As said, I'm opposed to all war. But I'm not stupid -- I know the history. Better to defend democracy by providing Ukraine military aid (the US provided RUSSIA military aid against Hitler) than see Ukraine again subjugated, and NATO attacked, and therefore AMERICAN BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN EUROPE A THIRD TIME.
1
@uonecar Let's be clear -- unlike your sucking down the Republican lies: the money allocated for the defense of Ukraine is not sent to Ukraine. It is used to replenish the WEAPONRY that the US is providing to Ukraine. And stop the stupid and bullshitting: there is no way the Republican Party -- see Iraq, Afghanistan -- and its constant upping the budget for the defense industry, and its working with the NRA/gun industry and its implementation of DOMESTIC mayhem -- is an anti-war party. Iraq, especially, was an ILLEGAL invasion based on FALSIFICATIONS against Saddam Hussein: HISTORY: Jimmy Carter put Iraq on the "Rogue State" list, and refused to provide it any war-making materials. Reagan, having a hyped-up grudge against Iran, took Iraq off that list so he could supply Saddam Hussein weapons to use against Iran. The "Iran gassing their own people" was a lie: the gas used was produced by Britain and the US, and provided by Reagan, and Hussein used it against Iran. I'm an idealist -- I oppose all war. But that is tempered by my knowledge of history. Trump is a DOMESTIC enemy who REJECTS the rule of law. And you want to defend him as because he LIES about getting out of wars!? Look what Trump did in Syria: the Kurds were the US's allies, and doing the actual fighting and dying, while the US backed them with military hardware and logistics. Trump pulled out the troops and left the Kurds to fend for themselves, and they were slaughtered. Tell us how making enemies, and making promises that can't be trusted, creates friends and allies instead of enemies.
1