Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Dr. Phil: I made ‘headway’ discouraging Trump from retribution against political foes" video.

  1. "Dr. Phil" will always claim to be a success. It's all about the MONEY.
    5
  2.  @mdougf  "Dr. Phil" is full of shit. But you believe his SELF-promotion isn't in fact ADVERTISING the PRODUCT that is "Dr. Phil".
    2
  3.  @mdougf  If that were true, everyone would knew it beyond the "litigation arena". I have an education in law and have never heard anything of the sort. But I will tell you that when law and psychology (he's not even a psychiatrist) meet it is a mess: BOTH sides in the case hire their own "psychologist", and they just happen to be so "scientific" that their respective "diagnoses" just happen to fit the side of the case by whom they are being PAID.
    2
  4. I lost that for him back in the 1970s when he was pushing right-wing economic ideology disguised as the "science" of psychology. He's always been a huckster.
    2
  5.  @mdougf  Stop the Stupid, Comrade.
    2
  6.  @mdougf  No one knows that because it is HOGWASH.
    2
  7.  @mdougf  Hogwash. If you pay him enough, he will agree with you.
    2
  8. He's all about the money.
    2
  9. "Dr. Phil" is full of shit.
    2
  10.  @karens.1430  "Dr. Phil" is full of shit. Want his opinion to support your position? -- then pay him his going rate.
    1
  11. "Dr. Phil" is a political huckster pretending to be a scientist.
    1
  12.  @SJ-li6ho  In other words, you can't handle the fact that "Dr. Phil" is a right-wing TeeVee celebrity who is full of shit when it comes to doing "psychology". He attempted to help Trump "get over" on the viewer. But Trump refused to cooperate. No: there is NO "RIGHT" to seek retribution -- especially when Trump's means are ILLEGAL. I'd ask if you are paid to be stupid, or if you are stupid for free, but you're too stupid to understand the question, let alone to know the answer.
    1
  13.  @RJ42997  Actually "everyone" knows no such thing. The FACT is that the 34 guilty verdicts are based foremost on the DOCUMENTS -- the EVIDENCE -- which were generated by and obtained from the Trump criminal enterprise. And on the testimony of NON-HOSTILE Trump allied witnesses David Pecker and Hope Hicks. And this is the fundamental principle you law-illiterates need to learn: "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. The REASON Trump has consistently LOST in court is because IN COURT one presents LAW -- his constant OLITIAL rants are IRRELEVANT. And as for the gag order: WITNESS intimidation is ILLEGAL. JURY tampering is ILLEGAL. THAT is why the gag order has been UPHELD by THREE appellate courts. And there was a LEGAL way AROUND the gag order: by Trump taking the witness stand and testifying under oath. And he SAID, PUBLICLY, ON VIDEO, that he "absolutely" would testify. But when it came to Trump ACTUALLY testifying he CHICKENED OUT because he KNEW that he had two choices: either confess to the fact that he committed the crimes as charged; or commit PERJURY. His boy Weaselberg is presently sitting in jail at Rikers for COMMITTING PERJURY.
    1
  14.  @tlc0963  Seek help -- but not from "Dr. Phil": he is only qualified to be a TV celebrity, not to actually provide any sort of "therapy". You can watch the video and see him FAIL with Trump -- which in a way is surprising, becuase they're bothh full of shit.
    1
  15.  @ivedoneitall  Yep -- presenting FACTS are a problem for MAGA.
    1
  16.  @1247.cccccc  Falsification of business records to cover-up another crime. The "other crime" are several: tax fraud, interference in the election. You'd know all that if you actually paid attention to the trial EVIDENCE, instead of guzzling the constant lying of anti-American career felon Trump.
    1
  17.  @wsbs520  What are Ophrah's qualifications? yes: "Dr. Phil" is a huckster. He's full of shit.
    1
  18.  @wsbs520  What are YOUR qualifications -- your racism being the opposite of qualifications.
    1
  19.  @Jmjdit  He's a TV personality, a celebrity, an entertainer. He does not actually have a "practice" with actual patients. He doesn't even qualify as a theoretician. And he is overtly a right-wing Republican pushing his politics -- none of which has anything to do with psychology or science. In sum: he is full of shit.
    1
  20.  @onefabknitternz  "Dr. Phil" is an entertainer, and it has made him a multi-millionaire. He doesn't actually practice what he preaches. He's not even qualified to be a qualified theoretician. In sum: He is full of shit, and anyone who believes his spew is stupid.
    1