Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "The Atlantic: John Kelly defends Vindman after firing" video.

  1. It's not news that North Korea isn't going to "denuclearize".
    51
  2.  @AlexH-nt1gg  He could have voluntarily testified to the House. And if Republican-controlled, he could have spoken to the media.
    13
  3.  @valvetap1  Or when he resigned.
    7
  4. Stop the generalized smear. 17 gov't officials obey their Congressional subpoenas -- they are not cowards. Humans are imperfect, There is always corruption. What you are alleging is that ALL are corrupt -- which is the stupidity of the simpleton who doesn't make a habit of actually THINKING.
    7
  5.  @maryd1376  We know the evidence and the law, America-hater. Even REPUBLICAN Senators ADMITTED that the House Managers PROVED Trump GUILTY. And no: Trump DID NOT have every "right" -- presidential powers belong to the office, not to the occupant of the office; they are not "rights" -- to extort of foreign power into investigating a political opponent. That is not only an impeachable abuse of power, it is a violation of the campaign finance STATUTE. It is a CRIMINAL OFFENSE. As was THIS, law-illiterate fool: "Russia, if you're listening, see if you can find" -- etc. That is Solicitation of a CRIME. You'd be more persuasive if you were to remain totally silent.
    6
  6.  @knightspask9218  There's no greater snowflake than Trump. The slightest criticism and he triggers and melts down.
    6
  7. READ the 25th Amendment so you know what it requires to be invoked. AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN. And STOP giving him the excuse of mental incompetence. What he is and does is what you see -- without any filters.
    2
  8. He can't Amend the constitution. That can only be done by Constitutional Amendment, via Congress, and only on the approval of many states. It takes YEARS to do. The "Bill of Rights" as submitted to the States -- in the 1790s -- for consideration and ratification consisted of TWELVE proposed Amendments. The first two were rejected. Then the first was ratified in early 2000s. The ERA has been floating around the states since the 1970s. It is still not ratified. It helps to know the ACTUAL law before popping off with false "legal" opinions -- doing so tends to force one to keep one's mouth shut.
    1
  9.  @Wordalways  “William Roper: “So, now you give the Devil the benefit of law!” Sir Thomas More: “Yes! What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil?” William Roper: “Yes, I'd cut down every law in England to do that!” Sir Thomas More: “Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned 'round on you, where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country is planted thick with laws, from coast to coast, Man's laws, not God's! And if you cut them down -- and you're just the man to do it -- do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I'd give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake!” ― Robert Bolt, A Man for All Seasons
    1
  10. We're glad you walked away too: we don't want stupid to contaminate elections.
    1