Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "What the Trump rally shooter told coworkers before the assassination attempt" video.

  1. That is how the EMPLOYER referred to him. Learn to FOCUS; stop attacking normal irrelevancies
    33
  2. So he was also scheduled to work Saturdays at a facility for the elderly? How is it unusual for there to be employees working also during weekends at facilities that are open and operating seven days per week?
    5
  3. What relevance has that to the assassination attempt? And what relevance to "Project 2025"?
    2
  4.  @noble_norse7786  They have a range of responsibilities. But YOU are an EXPERT on what the job description entails because YOU once had a job where you were allowed to use a can opener to open cans in the belief you wouldn't injure yourself or others while doing so.
    2
  5.  @mattr.1887  Are you the "media" that can be trusted because making up shit?
    1
  6.  @sandrab2589  There is nothing ridiculous about accurate reporting of facts, even when the facts are entirely non-controversial. The report uses the term that the EMPLOYER gave to the employee who turned out to be the gunman, and then provided the media as to his job description.
    1
  7.  @tommycarroll259  He had a JOB TITLE given BY THE EMPLOYER.
    1
  8.  @sandrab2589  And the reporter, Miller, reports ACCURATELY. It is the assholes who treat actual facts as excuses for baseless RIDICULE and making up bullshit who are being ASSHOLES.
    1
  9.  @carlmassengale1027  For no legitimate reason.
    1
  10.  @ronaldperry  The "PC" is STICKING TO THE FACTS, instead of feeding you distorted trash for your entertainment about issues that are not entertainment.
    1
  11.  @sandrab2589  Miller is one of those accurate elitists you hate. There was no fact-checking necessary: the investigators were told by the employer the TITLE the gunman had as an employee. IT DOESN'T MATTER -- even though the FACT it is IRRELEVANT. It is NOT a fact MATERIAL to the issue: they know his name. They know where he worked, and his job title. They know the gun he used, and that he shot at Trump and others. You do a typo and at the same time demand "fact-checking" of the irrelevant. Gad, the un-self-aware DUMBNITUDE.
    1
  12.  @matmclelland4701  I adhere to facts and law. And I pay attention to QUALIFICATIONS. Miller has QUALIFICATIONS that the Trumpian anti-fact loons don't begin to understand let alone respect. So they make shit up, and ask questions that have no relevance to anything except to their "expert" anti-gov't FANTASIES. It isn't rocket science: investigators went to his workplace and asked questions. The employer provided the gunman's job title -- that being a simple fact. There is no reason that that fact would need to be "fact-checked" because there is no evidence or reason that the employer would lie. The whole effort by the second-guessing illiterates is to distract from the fact that the gunman was a registered Republican. And they'll attack anyone who provides facts that they DON'T LIKE -- which is the essence of STUPIDITY. And that is how they diminish their intelligence and relevance -- the more facts, the more reality they REJECT, based simply on the fact that they DON'T LIKE THEM, the less and less they are connected to reality. The result: stupidity and irrelevance.
    1