Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Analyst: This is a four-alarm fire" video.

  1. To say that Sanders is more of a Democrat than Republican Bloomberg doesn't make sense -- which I attribute to you being a newbie to politics. In other words, it is lame if you believe it's a defense of Sanders to change the subject to to attacking someone else. In still other words: Sanders and Trumpp "fans" are exactly the same: criticize the candidate, and they attack the critic -- which isn't a defense of the candidate. WITHOUT your corrupt "reasoning: the FACT is that Sanders IS NOT a Democrat, isn't REGISTERED with the Democratic Party as a Democrat, and is far-Left even of Progressivism. Another FACT Sanders "fans" ignore: during his TWENTY-FIVE YEARS in Congress, Sanders was TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE. So tell us: how, suddenly, will he BECOME effective, while his "fans" are boasting that he's NEVER CHANGED since his earliest years in politics. What that means in REALITY is that he HASN'T LEARNED OR GROWN, for if he had, his views would have CHANGED. Ultimately, Sanders "fans" is defending that which is actually inflexibility and a REFUSAL to COMPROMISE. COMPROMISE is the ESSENCE of DEMOCRACY. And THAT is why he both HASN'T CHANGED, and has for exactly as long been ENTIRELY INEFFECTIVE. Compare that to Warren, who is an Eleanor Roosevelt Progressive, ACCOMPLISHED the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau -- while at the very same time Sanders accomplished NOTHING -- except to vote AGAINST the "Brady Bill" FIVE TIMES, and voting to PROTECT the gun industry, BOTH of which were top priorities of the far-RIGHT ANTI-Socialist terrorist organization NRA.
    2