Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Prosecutor investigating Trump lays out timeline" video.

@troycote9447 Educate yourself, dunce -- ___ "No Collusion"? Trump's July 27, 2016 Solicitation of Crime with Russia. This is Webster's definition of "collusion": "Secret agreement or cooperation for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose". How many Trumpeters lied about their contacts with Russians during the Trump-Putin COLLUSION? THIS IS THE LAW: The Model Penal Code defines solicitation as commanding, encouraging, or requesting another person to engage in conduct that constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime (with the intent that the crime be committed). Model Penal Code S. 5.02(1) (1962). Generally the code provides that solicitation be as punishable as the crime solicited. Id. at S. 5.05(1). Law Dictionary, Giffis, at 446. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE: We have Trump on video, in broad daylight, soliciting Russia: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." To "find" those emails required computer hacking. Computer hacking is a felony. In fact, he solicited a series of felonies, beginning with computer hacking and stealing private property, through to receiving and possessing that stolen property. And we know that on the same day as Trump's solicitation, within hours thereafter, Russia hacked computers and stole the emails. That made Trump a co-conspirator with Russia. That conspiracy is an additional felony. ____________ PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT.
4
@megadittos100 It can't be proven that there's a "God". And you hate "Jesus" by defaming "Him".
3
@vivianspinarski4846 Note that the REPUBLICANS investigated Hillary Clinton REPEATEDLY, based upon SMEARS by REPUBLCIANS, and in EVERY INSTANCE EXONERATED her of the FALSE allegations. Still Trump smeared her based on REJECTION of DUE PROCESS, which is premised upon PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE, by asserting the lawless dictate, "LOCK HER UP!" Hitler, Putin -- dictators lock people up without EVIDENCE OR TRIAL.
3
@vivianspinarski4846 Is it actually funny? Or do always laugh in the face of facts you don't like so as to avoid them? When you deny the rights of others you deny your own. Think that through.
3
@megadittos100 Moron: 1. It can't be proven there's a "God" 2. The First Amendment separates "religion" and gov't. 3. Trump is a career criminal and seditious conspirator. And there is a thin line between sedition and treason. 4. Those who support Trump AGAINST the rule of law hate America. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams.
3
@rekcusdoo We are only now learning of the many tentacles of Trump's seditious conspiracy. One DOES NOT indict before completing the investigationS, PLURAL. The Fulton County, GA DA investigation includes the fake elector certificates, the resignation of the US Atty., Giuliani's efforts before the GA legislature, Trump's phone calls to GA officials, Lindey Graham's phone call to those officials, and likely more. EACH of those involves many individuals and much fine detail.
3
Joyce Vance said what I've been saying all along: investigations take time.
2
@Susie Physical Your comment is ignorant, sheeple. What you omit is that mainstream media is LEGITIMATE in that it complies with ETHICS.
2
@silverlakegirl9078 Sure you do. And don't let anyone sell you the Brooklyn Bridge because I already own it ten times over.
2
@Mikesorrento3344 "No Collusion"? Trump's July 27, 2016 Solicitation of Crime with Russia. This is Webster's definition of "collusion": "Secret agreement or cooperation for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose". How many Trumpeters lied about their contacts with Russians during the Trump-Putin COLLUSION? THIS IS THE LAW: The Model Penal Code defines solicitation as commanding, encouraging, or requesting another person to engage in conduct that constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime (with the intent that the crime be committed). Model Penal Code S. 5.02(1) (1962). Generally the code provides that solicitation be as punishable as the crime solicited. Id. at S. 5.05(1). Law Dictionary, Giffis, at 446. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE: We have Trump on video, in broad daylight, soliciting Russia: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." To "find" those emails required computer hacking. Computer hacking is a felony. In fact, he solicited a series of felonies, beginning with computer hacking and stealing private property, through to receiving and possessing that stolen property. And we know that on the same day as Trump's solicitation, within hours thereafter, Russia hacked computers and stole the emails. That made Trump a co-conspirator with Russia. That conspiracy is an additional felony. ____________ PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT.
2
@xKhfan213x Let us know when Trump STOPS being a criminal.
2
@rekcusdoo The Trump phone call is certainly hard evidence of him violating the law. I rely on the experts in law, not random cynics on youtube.
2
@DIEmicrosoft Biden is qualified and is doing an excellent job. Your baseless hate is immoral and it's first victim yourself.
2
It took more than two years to get Nixon, and the crimes committed were much fewer and simpler than those committed by Trump, et al.
2
@georgec8451 Trump is a career criminal -- and that's never been a secret. His actions -- as the EVIDENCE shows -- in LYING that the election was stolen is defined IN LAW as seditious conspiracy. This is in the Constitution you illiterates have never READ: "Art. I., S. 8., C. 15. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute [ENFORCE] the Laws of the Union, SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS, and repel Invasions." To "take up arms" against the gov't is INSURRECTION. The Founders charged insurrectionists with, tried them for, and convicted them of TREASON, and sentenced them to death. You're a law-illiterate anti-American; and if you could reach that far around, you'd stab yourself in the back.
2
@Susie Physical For you making sense certainly doesn't matter.
1
@rekcusdoo Some do take years.
1
@we.americaningenuity8682 Don't believe anything posted by "We.American Ingenuity.
1
@vivianspinarski4846 And you repeat it.
1
@danielee500 Make a decision: you can bash the gov't, like a good little Republican, because not providing instant gratification; or you can watch and learn how investigations and legal process work. Which do you want? -- fast and sloppy; or convictions?
1
@rekcusdoo Yes, sure, you have a Juris Doctorate, which is why you don't know that the mainstream media interviews veteran prosecutors when the issue is LAW. In addition: ___ "No Collusion"? Trump's July 27, 2016 Solicitation of Crime with Russia. This is Webster's definition of "collusion": "Secret agreement or cooperation for a fraudulent or deceitful purpose". How many Trumpeters lied about their contacts with Russians during the Trump-Putin COLLUSION? THIS IS THE LAW: The Model Penal Code defines solicitation as commanding, encouraging, or requesting another person to engage in conduct that constitutes a crime or an attempt to commit a crime (with the intent that the crime be committed). Model Penal Code S. 5.02(1) (1962). Generally the code provides that solicitation be as punishable as the crime solicited. Id. at S. 5.05(1). Law Dictionary, Giffis, at 446. THIS IS THE EVIDENCE: We have Trump on video, in broad daylight, soliciting Russia: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." To "find" those emails required computer hacking. Computer hacking is a felony. In fact, he solicited a series of felonies, beginning with computer hacking and stealing private property, through to receiving and possessing that stolen property. And we know that on the same day as Trump's solicitation, within hours thereafter, Russia hacked computers and stole the emails. That made Trump a co-conspirator with Russia. That conspiracy is an additional felony. ____________ PLEASE CIRCULATE INTACT.
1
@rekcusdoo Joyce Vance and Glenn Kirshner, as examples. are former prosecutors. Suggest you watch something other than FOX.
1
@morvel40 How about the 900,000 Americans killed by Trump's disinformation campaign about COVID?
1
@rekcusdoo So you're a Trumpeter, claiming to have a "Juris Doctorate," admitting you're not a medical doctor and yet judging medical doctors' informed views. You assert that the veteran prosecutors I've named quoted the law "wrong" -- but don't provide a single example. Because you're an alleged "Juris Doctor" who doesn't know that you are responsible for not only your assertions buts also to back them up. In an early comment you asserted that Watergate was a "nothing burger". Watergate began with a burglary -- which is a CRIME, not a "nothing burger". Judge Sirica, a REPUBLICAN, broke the case opening by hammering them with stiff sentences that persuaded them to talk. Those burglars were also paid "hush money" -- bribery is a crime -- which were tracked to C.R.E.E.P. -- the Committee to Reelect the President -- whose chair was Nixon's Attorney General John Mitchell. Investigation found that he, John Mitchell, approved the hush payments. In other words: he committed a CRIME. And Mitchell was one of at least 42 Nixon administration officials and/convicted for their crimes in behalf of Nixon. You, with your alleged "Juris Doctorate," aren't playing with the typical Trumpeter, who is dumber than dead rocks. I was in my late 20s during Watergate and followed all the fine detail in both print and broadcast media. I wasn't born yesterday and have an education in law. "A system of Laws, and not of men." -- John Adams. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams. Take your rejection of the rule of law to the "FOX" comments section -- if they aren't blocking comments in order to suppress critical alternative views.
1
Watergate was much simpler, but it took more than two years for Nixon to resign. You have the opportunity to learn how investigation and legal process work. Or you can continue to bash, demanding instant gratification, and see the perpetrators escape justice.
1
@geoffrey_b The effort to "get" Nixon began with his announcement of his candidacy in 1968. He resigned in August 1974. Most of those who minimize Watergate don't know what they're talking about. And they certainly ignore and refuse to learn that investigations take time, and precede legal process, which also takes time.
1
@alizakessler You aren't paying attention. Suggest you listen to, as example, the taped phone conversation of Trump attempting to get the GA Sec. of State to commit election fraud. And there plenty more EVIDENCE of his SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY leading in several directions. The only election fraud was committed by Trump and his associates -- while at the same time you were chasing the smell of his bullshit allegations that the Democrats were committing the fraud.
1
@alizakessler Yes: he was looking for votes that didn't exist. Wake up: After the election there were THREE AUDITS. NO illegal votes were found. AFTER those audits Trump attempted to bully two state elections officials, including the Sec. of State, to "find" votes that didn't exist. That violated several Georga laws.
1
The Fulton County DA is not investigating only Trump. She's also looking at Mark Meadows, Giuliani, and several other related areas.
1