Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Schiff discusses what could be in affidavit used to search Trump's home" video.

  1. This is the LAW: ALL information generated by gov't employees, regardless whether classified, is GOV'T PROPERTY.
    18
  2. Pence is a material witness. Either he straps on his prosthetic spine, or his ass is subpoenaed.
    2
  3. And you hate the United States and repudiate the Constitution, including your rights as secured thereby.
    1
  4.  Brandon  "What ever" should be "whatever". I adhere to facts and law against which you spew anti-American lawlessness. It remains the LAW -- which New York con-man and career criminal Trump, and his dupes, such as you -- REJECT, because that's what criminals do: ALL information generated by gov't employees, even the non-classified, is owned BY THE GOV'T, NOT by the employee. None of that is new or rocket science. And there is classified gov't secrets that can't be declassified by anyone, including a president, under any circumstances. And this is in the Constitution you fools repudiate: "Art. I., S. 8., C. 15. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute [ENFORCE] the Laws of the Union, SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS, and repel Invasions." To "take up arms" against the gov't is defined in LAW as INSURRECTION, which the Founders classified as TREASON. There is no "right" to commit treason. This is the Supreme Court's response to your law-illiterate NON-law anti-gov't gibberish: ----- From Supreme Court decision _Presser v. Illinois_, 116 U.S. 252 (1886): "(115) . . . . It cannot be successfully questioned that the state governments, unless restrained by their own constitutions . . . have . . . the power to control and regulate the organization, drilling, and parading of military bodies and associations . . . . (116) The exercise of this power by the states is necessary to the public peace, safety, and good order. To deny the power would be to deny the right of the state to disperse assemblages organized for sedition and treason, and the right to suppress armed mobs bent on riot and rapine." From _District of Columbia v. Heller_, 554 U.S. 570, 621 (2008) citing _Presser_: The Second Amendment "does not prevent the prohibition of private paramilitary organizations". In fact, all 50 states classify such fake "militia" -- "private paramilitary organizations" -- as "paramilitaries" and PROHIBIT them. One cannot legitimately claim to be defending the Constitution and laws by violating the Constitution and laws. Pick your state: https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/our-work/addressing-the-rise-of-unlawful-private-paramilitaries/state-fact-sheets/
    1