Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Brian Stelter calls out 'vicious' cycle of Trump's anti-media attacks" video.
-
15
-
12
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
2
-
@kurtisengle6256 When civilians "took up arms" against the government during the Founding era, the Founders charged them with, tried them for, and convicted them of, TREASON, and sentenced them to DEATH. See "Shayss" and "Whiskey" insurrections -- the latter of which occurred AFTER the Second Amendment was ratified.
Add in this fact: in EVERY state, the commander-in-chief of the Militia is the state's governor. If those protesters are the Militia, then they are engaged in mutiny against their commander-in-chief, which is a courts martial/death penalty offense. If they are not -- and they are not -- the Founders established the precedent of finding them guilty of TREASON, and sentencing them to DEATH.
The ONLY way for them to be legitimate as Militia they must either ENLIST in the National Guard, or be DRAFTED into it.
Last but not least, the ENTIRE Constitution is in effect at the same time, and includes this provision:
"Art. I., S. 8., C. 15. The CONGRESS shall have Power to provide for calling forth the Militia to . . . SUPPRESS INSURRECTIONS." Those ENGAGING in "taking up arms" agsinst the gov't/rule of law are INSURRECTIONISTS.
This is also in the Constitution:
"Art. I., S. 8., C. 16. The CONGRESS shall have Power To provide for organizing, ARMING, and disciplining, the Militia." So where did these fake "militia" get their non-self-defense ASSAULT weapons?
The Congress "provides" by enacting LAWS, in this context "Militia Acts," which REGULATE the "well-regulated Militia". These FAKE "militia" are operating OUTSIDE the law -- which was addressed in the "Declaration of Independence" as a COMPLAINT AGAINST King George III:
"He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power."
1