Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Defendant pleads guilty in major Trump legal case" video.

  1. And can probably make a feasible bail agreement with himself.
    16
  2. Trump 20-24 years.
    2
  3. Bizarre: they wanted to "prove" voting machine fraud with the data from a county that Trump WON by 70 per cent. Were they intending to prove their claim by showing that the machine flipped votes from Biden to Trump!?
    1
  4.  @Machistmo  The penalties are stipulated in EXISTING law. I heard something additional about 5 years per each violation.
    1
  5.  @seanmccartney5177  He is REQUIRED to testify truthfully, under oath, as often as the prosecution requires. If not the deal is withdrawn.
    1
  6.  @boatymsboatface3929  She may. Others may have dithered, not wanting to be the first because that might risk being the only one. Now that someone else jumped in and yelled, "The water's fine!" others will be motivated to take the plunge.
    1
  7.  @samuelvance5674  Bail bondsmen are in it for the money. If you can't pay the percentage, you stay in jail.
    1
  8.  @samuelvance5674  Based in realism -- they have no sympathy for those who can't pay the percentage.
    1
  9.  @seanmccartney5177  The plea deal details were reported IN FULL on MSNBC. But that is how plea DEALS work: "We'll give you a lesser sentence in exchange for you doing X, Y, and Z. But if you fail to do X, Y, and Z, we'll rescind the DEAL." Otherwise I was making a CYNICAL "joke": bail bondsmen are in it FOR THE MONEY -- this one is well-connected politically and is a multi-millionaire. They don't make bail deals out of the goodness of their heart. BUT, being a bail bondsman, and being subject to CRIMINAL indictment, he can probably get a real sweetheart bail deal FROM HIMSELF.
    1
  10.  @seanmccartney5177  And the "missing" is what? When the issue is law, it makes sense to LEARN from those who have expertise in law. It makes sense also to learn from those who have expertise in the RELEVANT area of law. When the issue is Federal law, MSNBC provides actual former seasoned Federal prosecutors who have prosecuted under the RELEVANT FEDERAL laws being discussed. CNN does a little of that. There is another purported "network" on youtube -- Meides -- which consists to two CIVIL practice lawyers, who have NEVER been CRIMINAL law prosecutors, along with several other non-lawyer political commentators. One of them -- Ben -- slings the same bigot's slurs and name-callings at Trump, and such as Judge Cannon, as the right-wing does, but is apparently either too stupid to look at how he is identical to the malefactors in doing that, or lives the same bigotries. Or he is deliberately using an exceedingly cheap -- and destructive -- means to produce panderer's click-bait. So he perpetuates the same crude discourse that is the problem. The more mature lawyer of the two -- Popok -- posts "Hot Takes" that are so poorly prepared that they are a garbled mix of "clarification" of law and politics, and undifferentiated tangents, that one can't make sense of either, except that his politics are ostensibly "liberal". MSNBC's seasoned prosecutors are exceedingly careful and clear by adhering strictly to the law, including caveats. They DO NOT mix in their or anyone else's political views and thus corrupt and bury their message. I make those distinctions based on the fact that I have an education in law, so wonder what sort of presentations these lawyers make to juries that are successful at anything other than confusing them. "Justice and the Rule of Law are to be ABOVE politics." -- John Adams.
    1
  11.  @seanmccartney5177  The FULL report I saw about the plea deal ALSO detailed the statutory basis for the potential and actual charges. That, if HEEDED by the viewer, cuts done on law-illiterate whining about the charges not being sufficient. The charges are from ALREADY EXISTING LAW, which law STIPULATES the charges. Prosecutors do not write the law; they don't make it up as they go along. The apply EXISTING law. If the law appears insufficient to the law-illiterate, it's because the law-illiterate aren't thinking in terms of aw; they are thinking in terms of emotion and VENGENCE. JUSTICE based on RULE OF LAW is NOT VENGEANCE. And that -- law-illiteracy -- is exactly how Trump and his dupes operate, and from whence comes his bogus allegations of "treason" and such, and the death threats he incites.
    1