Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "David Pakman Show"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It isn't that simple. Israel isn't the problem -- most Israelis want Netanyahu gone. The problem is Netanyahu and his extreme right-wing gang.
But in view of the content of Schumer's speech -- the words "pariah nation" -- Netanyahu can't win this one. He hasn't the power in relation to the US and his DEPENDENCY on the US. Schumer's words can't be written off because he's a Jew who has always supported Israel, but has had enough of Netanyahu's fascism. Schumer's speech is intended, and will, cause an earthquake in Israel
The US has the opportunity to finally, after 80 years, to shift the dynamic away from backing everything the Israeli gov't does to imposing conditions on the foreign policy that doesn't jeopardize the US's reputation.
Netanyahu supports TRUMP, and is also trying to undermine Biden. You should be SUPPORTING Biden. IN FACT: were that you knew anything about politics beyond the superficial, you'd have HEARD Biden saying, ALL ALONG, that Israel's policies in Gaza are totally indefensible. But foreign policy TAKES TIME; it is not a realm for the impatient unless they want to FAIL or make matters worse. In view of the history of the foreign policy, it takes time to BUILD to the point of making the issue PUBLIC.
And it is coordinated. The first PUBLIC comment was made by Vice President Harris. Then it was Biden's "accidental" "hot mic" comment. Next it was other Biden administration lower-level people. Then it was Senator Schumer -- that is the CENTRAL statement -- and then Biden reiterated BACKING Israel, but only as a single isolated statement.
Israel, and Netanyahu's gov't, are NOT THE SAME THING.
Even when I was 20, and the issue was Vietnam, I was never so politically naive and lacking in understanding that bought the far-Left demand for instant results -- because that isn't how REALITY works. So stop the simpleton's stupidity without regard for unintended consequences.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Founders disagree. I like how they established the law that eventuated in the First Amendment separation of "religion" and gov't:
___
From the North Carolina constitution adopted on December 18, 1776:
"XXXI. That no clergyman, or preacher of the gospel, of any denomination, shall be capable of being a member of either the Senate, House of Commons, or Council of State, while he continues in the exercise of the pastoral function.
. . . .
"XXXIV. That there shall be no establishment of any one religious church or denomination in this State, in preference to any other; neither shall any person, on any pretence whatsoever, be compelled to attend any place of worship contrary to his own faith or judgment, nor be obliged to pay, for the purchase of any glebe, or the building of any house of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry, contrary to what he believes right, or has voluntarily and personally engaged to perform; but all persons shall be at liberty to exercise their own mode of worship:--_Provided_, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to exempt preachers of treasonous or seditious discourses, from legal trial and punishment."
___
From the constitution of Georgia adopted on February 5, 1777:
"Art. LVI. All persons whatever shall have the free exercise of their religion; provided it be not repugnant to the peace and safety of the State; and shall not, unless by consent, support any teacher or teachers except those of their own profession."
"Art. LXII. No clergyman of any denomination shall be allowed a seat in the legislature."
___
From New York constitution adopted on April 20. 1777:
XXXIX. And whereas the ministers of the gospel are, by their profession, dedicated to the service of God and the care of souls, and ought not to be diverted from the great duties of their function; therefore, no minister of the gospel, or priest of any denomination whatsoever, shall, at any time hereafter, under any pretence or description whatever, be eligible to, or capable of holding, any civil or military office or place within this State.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2