Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Congress Holds Bizarre Prayer Event" video.
-
@Rain-Dirt One is also free to have NO "religion". If that right didn't exist one wouldn't be able to choose whatever "religion" one wanted from among those one didn't want.
The extremist religionuts have been at war against the separation of "religion" and gov't from BEFORE there was a First Amendment.
This is from the North Carolina constitition adopted on December 18, 1776:
"XXXI. That no clergyman, or preacher of the gospel, of any denomination, shall be capable of being a member of either the Senate, House of Commons, or Council of State, while he continues in the exercise of the pastoral function.
. . . .
"XXXIV. That there shall be no establishment of any one religious church or denomination in this State, in preference to any other; neither shall any person, on any pretence whatsoever, be compelled to attend any place of worship contrary to his own faith or judgment, nor be obliged to pay, for the purchase of any glebe, or the building of any house of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry, contrary to what he believes right, or has voluntarily and personally engaged to perform; but all persons shall be at liberty to exercise their own mode of worship:--_Provided_, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to exempt preachers of treasonous or seditious discourses, from legal trial and punishment."
You should use that information -- it is free to copy it: law is always owned by the public -- to back your assertion. But don't grant "religions" the false idea that their BELIEFS are "rights". Rights are defined and secured, as in the above, in non-"religious" LAW.
6
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@emm8357 Either quote the relevant portion of the First Amendment back to them, or put this in their face:
___
This is from the North Carolina constitution adopted on December 18, 1776:
"XXXI. That no clergyman, or preacher of the gospel, of any denomination, shall be capable of being a member of either the Senate, House of Commons, or Council of State, while he continues in the exercise of the pastoral function.
. . . .
"XXXIV. That there shall be no establishment of any one religious church or denomination in this State, in preference to any other; neither shall any person, on any pretence whatsoever, be compelled to attend any place of worship contrary to his own faith or judgment, nor be obliged to pay, for the purchase of any glebe, or the building of any house of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry, contrary to what he believes right, or has voluntarily and personally engaged to perform; but all persons shall be at liberty to exercise their own mode of worship:--_Provided_, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to exempt preachers of treasonous or seditious discourses, from legal trial and punishment."
1
-
1