Comments by "J Nagarya" (@jnagarya519) on "Law&Crime Network" channel.

  1. Lori is apparently a malignant narcissist -- five marriages, at least two husbands dead at relatively young ages.
    388
  2. "Prayer" doesn't undo reality.
    37
  3. Suppose you and I are having a conversation with each other. Aren't you and I both then hearing voices?
    11
  4. The mayor is a former cop talking like cops who hate that defendants have rights.
    10
  5. Prosectuing crimes is also about deterrence -- justice isn't only for the victims and or families; it is to send a message to the wider society.
    9
  6. He belongs on "Rumble," and "Rumble" would be shut down by a responsible corporation.
    7
  7. Lori's brother did the killings for her, then she had him killed. And she had Chad kill his wife. So her hands are "clean".
    7
  8. You don't even have the victims name right. And the corruption you cite is already being investigated -- and is IRRELEVANT to this case.
    6
  9.  @katiecraig6909  So they escape reality, and then preach their escape as "salvation" for everyone else.
    6
  10. His MOTHER said the photos looked like him. She should know.
    5
  11. The Mormon "religion" was established by men to justify polygamy. It doesn't surprise that that poppycock irrationality would lead to other crackpot offshoots used to rationalize wrong.
    5
  12. "Driving While intoxicated" = MURDERER! Gad, these unprofessional sensationalists pretending to be serious.
    5
  13. We don't have royalty -- such as "Lords" -- in the United States. And "heaven" is an unproven speculation. Amazing how "religious" delusions are used to counter "religious" delusions.
    5
  14. So uttering obscenities, as example, without regard for contexts, audiences, and RULES, is acceptable? One limitation on free speech is LEBEL LAW -- no one has any "Right" to damage others by LYING. There is another limitation on free speech: DECENCY.
    5
  15. His mother identified him from the photos. She should know, eh?
    4
  16. Was she a TRAINED "personal trainer"?
    4
  17. "Censorship" applies where the First Amendment applies. The First Amendment does not apply to youtube.
    4
  18. Even without a gag order there are limits. One of them is DECENCY.
    4
  19. Typical relative not having relevant expertise knows better than the experts.
    4
  20.  @daisymae4958  Only with fantasy.
    4
  21.  @katiecraig6909  And I chose to point to the irrationality of it. Note how the domestic terrorists in the US hide behind "religion"? Should we encourage the excuse and deceit, or be silent in the face of it?
    4
  22.  @motosmas860  News/fact is not the same as "opinion"/speculation and conspirabunk.
    4
  23. The so-called "manifesto" is a confession.
    3
  24. This is excellent in dealing with the irrational fools who are defending the murderer. But those fools do justify and substantiate the terrorism charge.
    3
  25. Elon Musk is law-illiterate. And his costly screwup with the Twitter deal would silence, at least for awhile, a less ego-driven individual.
    3
  26. You had him murdered? Then celebrate that you've not been arrested and charged.
    3
  27.  @daisymae4958  To whom -- the one doing the praying?
    3
  28. The Feds didn't charge the January 6th insurrectionists with terrorism. And they don't in this case. The terrorism charge is from the STATE. The terrorism charge is justified and substantiated by the murderer's own writings.
    3
  29. Have you been asleep until now? What do you think restraining orders are about? There are laws on the books prohibiting stalking because it has long been a problem. If you look at ALL the facts in the Lewinski-Clinton case, you'd realize that Lewinski was the stalker.
    2
  30. The January 6 Committee is on top of this: texts between Jones and ROGER STONE!
    2
  31. We have the crime on video. It's not an "alleged" crime.
    2
  32. "God" talks to me, and "He" told me that "He" doesn't talk to any other people.
    2
  33. The Read case is Canton police. The Birchmore case is Stoughton police. Canton and Stoughton are separate towns that share a border.
    2
  34. They OBVIOUSLY should have got out of the "bible" altogether.
    2
  35.  @jimeaton805  John Lennon.
    2
  36.  @Dima-rr8cj  Are you qualified to "diagnose"? Or do you always attack others with name-calling instead of addressing their actual statement?
    2
  37. @Marilyn Willett Faith is action without evidence. It is not necessarily unintelligent. To change the subject away from intellect to "feelings" is to argue for blindness. Nor is it the same as "religion" or doctrine.
    2
  38. We no long use "handicap[ped]". It is "disability".
    2
  39. There is also the evidence he discarded as trash in Pennsylvania.
    2
  40.  @lindsayceara  The MOTVE of the MURDERER who committed the CRIME was MURDER. The so-called "manifesto" is a CONFESSION -- and more details adding to the confession were found in his notebook. Stick to the facts, the evidence, and the law -- only by doing so will you be able to reason, and to say anything RELEVANT to the case. So far you law-rejecting law-illiterates are spewing gibberish that is dangerous -- promoting domestic terrorism -- which is inciting threats against innocent people. All in defense of the indefensible: MURDER. ___ From "A Man for All Seasons": In the following, Roper was Thomas More's hot-headed and impulsive son-in-law-- Roper: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! More: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? Roper: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you -- where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick with laws, from coast to coast -- man's laws, not God's -- and if you cut them down -- and you're just the man to do it -- do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake.
    1
  41.  @lindsayceara  The MURDERS motive is centrally relevant. All the other side issues you want to focus on are irrelevant -- except as it promotes MORE domestic terrorism.
    1
  42.  @lindsayceara  The corruption in United Health being investigated by the DOJ is IRRELEVANT to the MURDERER'S motive. Stop IGNORING the FACTUAL reporting on the EVIDENCE: the so-called "manifesto" is a CONFESSION, and there is more detail supplementing that in the murderer's notebook.
    1
  43.  @Rangyroth4089  Exactly. But uneducated people who guzzle's Trump's lies and participate in his promotion of domestic terrorism don't care about facts, truth, EVIDENCE, or reason. It's all about being aholes.
    1
  44.  @stephanie-s9y5f  Law-illiterates who defend criminality always attack the law from a position of not knowing what they're talking about. Their promotion in this case of domestic terrorism is both foolish and dangerous -- and the OPPOSITE of "MORAL".
    1
  45. $10,000 in cash, $2,000 of it in a foreign currency.
    1
  46.  @innocentnemesis3519  Nor are all murderers "psychopaths". We kill killers because killing is wrong.
    1
  47. The intent of domestic terrorism is to cause fear. And those who are defending the murderer are promoting domestic terrorism. Some have even attacked McDonald's and the entry-level minimum-wage employee because she called the authorities when he was recognized. McDonald's and the employee didn't commit any crimes. And the backpack manufacturer, who also didn't commit any crime, received death threats -- intended to cause fear -- from aholes who are defending the murderer. What you fools don't understand is that the spread of domestic terrorism, beyond being an assault on the rule of law, results in a breakdown in -- and THEN EVERYONE is a target. It is stunning the blatant immorality claiming to be moral by those who obviously couldn't care less about right and wrong. ___ From "A Man for All Seasons": In the following, Roper was Thomas More's hot-headed and impulsive son-in-law-- Roper: So now you'd give the Devil benefit of law! More: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after the Devil? Roper: I'd cut down every law in England to do that! More: Oh? And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you -- where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat? This country's planted thick with laws, from coast to coast -- man's laws, not God's -- and if you cut them down -- and you're just the man to do it -- do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? Yes, I give the Devil benefit of law, for my own safety's sake.
    1
  48. His own writings SUBSTANTIATE that he was engaging in domestic terrorism. And that is FURTHER substantiated by those who, like you, pick up his ball and run with it by promoting more of the same. The charge is exactly suited to his intent and crime.
    1
  49. If you LISTEN to the murderer you hear him DENY he has problems. So who is the hospital to believe -- him, or you?
    1
  50.  @MiracleFound  Correct. Law-illiterates don't realize they are law-illiterate so are unconstrainedfrom spewing "opinions" without regard for actual law.
    1