Comments by "ZetsubenSama" (@ZetsubenSama) on "Valuetainment" channel.

  1. ​ @igors1234  okay, at what point would you consider something normal? We can observe cancer in other animal species, just like homosexuality. We observe cancer to be a naturally accuring thing, just like homosexuality. You can't take a pill against cancer, just like homosexuality. Cancer is not a uncommon thing either, there are hundrets of different kinds with different treatments. You can't cure cancer, just like homosexuality the difference is one kills you while the other makes other people kill you. At one point you might want to consider your world view as very narrow and silly.
    4
  2. ​ @LogicCaster you also experienced childhood Traumas. That did not turn you gay. You are confusing correlation and causation again.
    4
  3. ​Most child abusers also have a relationship with the child: Like a family member. Near all people who have used hard drugs have smoked pot before.​ Not a lot of pot smokers use hard drugs. Your logic is lacking: mentioning and implying hat child abuse is the "cause" for lgbt is just false. You have just shown that yourself. Abused children don't become child abusers themselfs by default, children with ACE's don't become magically gay and smoking pot doesn't mean you'll become a heroin addics. You have no argument. Get therapy. 🤡= @LogicCaster 
    4
  4. ​ @LogicCaster so you can't argue properly, just spewing nonsence 😂 This you ->🤡 Go to therapy.
    4
  5. ​ @LogicCaster yeah: no. Thats just another lie you tell. But hey, awesome that you compare Being gay, having a fetish and your own preference in a partner. So you like asian, is that a fetish to you? 😂 I'd love to know, it would fit perfectly with your pathetic incel ideology 😂😂
    4
  6. ​ @LogicCaster it happens even then silly.
    4
  7. ​ @LogicCaster that's just false
    4
  8.  @LogicCaster  you are still false.
    4
  9.  @RiggyRonnie  and the hundrets of relatives are just non existend? 🤣
    4
  10.  @RiggyRonnie  He has enough similarity and He will continue the bloodline.
    4
  11. The guy above definetly is on the moron side.
    4
  12. ​ @LogicCaster consent is key to differenciate between sex and grape silly. Consent is important and is the base line for All to determine if something is justifiable or not.
    4
  13. "Satans rainbow" is the funniest stuff i have heard for weeks.
    4
  14. ​ @Icouldcareless9000 this narative of LGBT people sexualising children and that they are gr00mers is straight up rethoric from 1934's germany
    3
  15. ​ @LogicCaster Religion is not the study of Morality.
    3
  16.  @LogicCaster  Heres the literal definition by Oxford languages: "the belief in and worship of a superhuman power or powers, especially a God or gods." If you want to give such a definition then please to so, with a source.
    3
  17.  @LogicCaster  its a definition silly, you also boiled it down to just 6 words and you even refuse the supernatural aspect of religion in its totality. Hypocrit.
    3
  18. ​ @LogicCaster also: You can't even count properly, the definition is 16 words long not 15. Autist.
    3
  19. ​ @LogicCaster you just show again how pathetic you are silly. Get therapy.
    3
  20. Bisexuality is not a problem at all. It harms no one and is not an issue to anyone exept for religious extremists and biggots like you. No one learns to be bi or gay. That's silly and absolutly not how sexuality works. ​ @LogicCaster 
    3
  21. ​ @LogicCaster literally no one has noticed a sexualised horse Profile picture because that's still not what it is. It's just a picture of a cartoon character, if you see it as sexualised then that tells more about you then anyone else 💀
    3
  22.  @LogicCaster  =🤡
    3
  23. ​​ @LogicCaster there you are. Funny how you make fun of the jews again while calling me a nazi. Pathetic
    3
  24. I don't need to explain that to them, they already know that. Gender and sexuality are on a spectrum. There are different degrees of bisexuality ffs. You are continuing to be wilfully ignorant about the topics you are ranting about. Amazing how much you cope. I did not call anyone "simply gay", you should read more carefull.  @LogicCaster 
    3
  25. You do realise what bi means, right?
    3
  26.  @frannynet553  ok, so: bi means the sexual attraction to both the same and the opposite sex. A woman can still be bisexual, even if they are with a man. Not to mention that there are different degrees to that, bi people don't like both 50/50, there are layers to this.
    3
  27.  @LogicCaster  get therapy 🤡
    3
  28. ​​ @LogicCaster it was not available for children tho and the "discussions" are not helpfull at all, especially since the people involved are more often than not religious fanatics who have no critical thinking skills. People like you. Get therapy 🤡
    3
  29. ​ @LogicCaster then why advocate for it? You defended walsh when He said that teenagers, as young as 16, should get married and pregnant. I pointed out data that Shows that it is very easy for minors to be married to older man, it happens all the time in the US, you just shrugged it off. You advocate for minors to marry. You say "only peds marry children" but then you don't call out the real issue of older men who marry minors LEGALLY, instead you advocate for it. What was it again with the bible Story of Rachel? I pointed out that she was a minor when she was promissed to Jacob. She was 22 when married, but Jacob (a older male adult) Fell in love with her when she was 8 years old . You just dismisses that. "It was a different time" "There were not a lot of people around" Instead of clearly stating "DON'T FALL IN LOVE WITH 8 YEAR OLDS" How TF is this a Hill you are willing to Die on?
    3
  30. ​ @AppleOfThineEye He lies. He has defended walsh when He said that teenagers should be married and pregnant since they are "most fertile at that age".
    3
  31. ​ @AppleOfThineEye He ignored data that Shows that there are a lot of older men who get married to teenage girls. He does not care about older men who get married to children, alledget "peds".
    3
  32. ​ @AppleOfThineEye He defended and dismissed the fact that in the bible Story of Rachel and Jacob Rachel was 8 years old when promissed to Jacob, a older man. The bible states was Rachel was 22 when married, Jacob worked 14 years to marry her, so she was 8 when (it says in the bible) He Fell in love with her. A 50+ male who Fell in love with a 8 year old. Note: Jacob was tricked into working 2×7 years. So she originally was planned to marry him when she was 15.
    3
  33. ​ @LogicCaster you defended walsh when He said that teenagers should be married and pregnant. I posted the question multiple times: Do you think it is okay or in any way justifiable to have minors married? Especially if the minors are sometimes 40+ years younger then the people they get married to?
    3
  34. ​​ @LogicCaster keep up buddy, i said that Rachel was married when she was 22. You should realy work on your reading skill.
    3
  35. ​ @AppleOfThineEye bro thinks about necrophilia again too 💀 The guy realy has some weird fantasy involving children, dead people and animals. A truly broken individual.
    3
  36. Doubt it.
    3
  37. ​ @LogicCaster it's not a sexualised pony my dude. It's just a pony. If you think that this character is sexual then that tells a lot more about you then the guy you are talking to.
    3
  38. ​ @LogicCaster it's a cartoon character. The lashes are actually in the Show. The "makeup" is just shading. That's what high definition Art often looks like. This is not limited to kids Shows, it goes into every Genre of show, Media, Art and so on. It's not a sexualised Version of a cartoon character. If you think it is then you are telling on yourself 💀 Cartoon corn also has nothing to do with lgbt. That's just silly. Get therapy 🤡
    3
  39. It does not fit the definition of a religion.
    3
  40.  @LogicCaster  and those parameters are suppose to be what? Is there a expert like, oh i don't know a theologan who'd agree with that? Also: a cult is not a religion buddy, theres a difference and you'd know that if you googled "cult" for once instead of just throwing the word around like you do now.
    3
  41.  @LogicCaster  i never sayed that theologans are useless, i just keep to a definition. If experts (so people that are not you) want to correct/challenge that definition then thats absolutly legit since they have a deep understanding of the topic and related fields. You on the other hand just denie such definitions since it does not fit your world view. So i ask again: what definition of religion are you using and what is the source for such definition and is there an expert in the field of religion who agrees with that statement? If not then your whole comment is absolutly meaningless and another pathetic attempt to change the topic since you have no argument.
    3
  42. ​ @LogicCaster yeah and i mentioned how it does not fit the definition that can be looked up with one google search. If you know any theologans who would agree with you i would love to hear theyr names so i can check. But you probably just lie here again, it shows how desperat you sre for that W since you got that Big L profile pic 😂
    3
  43. ​ @LogicCaster so you just use a definition that fits your pathetic world view without any source at all. Very telling. Get therapy you pathetic fool.😂
    3
  44.  @LogicCaster  funny that you twist it as you like. One definition is just an outline, another has such a huge impact that it will alledgetly destroy all of western society. Hypocrite. Get therapy.
    3
  45. ​​ @LogicCaster funny how you just do some gymnastics again so if fits how you like it. One definition is just an outline, so its not that important, but you'll raise all hell if a definition changes becouse it has an supposed impact on society. You are a hypocrite, nothing more then a child and you are coping again hard. Marriage has little to do with children silly. "You shouldn't be researching" is just pathetic. It shows again that you have no argument, a simple source exposes your lies while you can't even sight a wikipedia article. Get therapy.
    3
  46. What do you mean by that?
    3
  47. ​ @LogicCaster thats litterally what you do, remember? "Kids should be married becouse they are most fertile" You are pathetic. Get therapy.
    3
  48. ​ @LogicCaster you didn't say that but you defend Matt Walsh when He said it. No, lgbt people don't want to rape children. That's like me stating all conservatives want to marry children. It's just not true.
    3
  49. ​ @LogicCaster ah so now you want a source? Maybe he just roundet up the numbers 🤡
    3
  50. ​ @LogicCaster you are just pathetic 😂 "I have no romantic interest at all" He doesn't want to have sex, He is asexual, He has no sexual desire in the first place. You are telling people to go against theyr personal interests for no other reason then your vague Moral compas that got corrupted by silly ideology. Go get therapy 🤡 "sO sElFIsH🤡"
    3