Comments by "Tx240" (@Texas240) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. She said she was donating it because she didn't want anything from her abuser. She kept the money, ergo, no abuse.
    3
  2. It should have also had a mandatory minimum for being a hate crime. She killed him because he was black.
    1
  3. First, part of the corrupt UK judge, Justice Nicol, reasoning for believing Heard's verbal testimony over Depp's AND the actual evidence provided by Depp was that Heard must be a good, honest person since she DONATED the $7 million to charity. No donation, here, equals not a good, honest person. Incidentally, corrupt Justice Nicol retired shortly after the case, for he accepted a pleasant back channel "donation". Maybe HE was the actual charity he referred to in his statement. Second, Heard said she was donating it because she didn't want anything from her abuser. She kept the money, ergo, no abuse.
    1