Comments by "Tx240" (@Texas240) on "Jake Broe"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@crogeny - Speaking of timetables, in 2008, Dubya was still sparring with Putin over who was actually head of a world power. Putin warned, told, Dubya not to invade Iraq for Iraq 2. Putin never got over the fact that the American cowboy considered Russia so toothless that America wouldn't heed Putin's warning.
So, of course Dubya would urge NATO to do things, like talk up admitting Ukraine, that would follow the same grain of sidelining Putin's Russia.
In 2009 Obama came to the White House and began the "Russian Reset". At that point, anything offensive to Russia ceased, including the US honoring its commitments under the Budapest Memorandum to protect the territorial integrity of Ukraine.
So, again, you would be correct to argue that since the fall of the Soviet Union, Ukraine WAS being considered for NATO membership, "someday"....someday.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1:09 Jake, make no mistake, mass indiscriminate killing of civilians is also Israel's policy towards Palestinians.
Except, Isreal has tanks, jets, and helicopter gunships. So, Israel is much better at it than HAMAS. The Israeli policy is to eliminate women before 30 can have more children and eliminate the children before they can grow up to be HAMAS.
Israel is the Russia of the Middle East.
Israel bombs the only authorized exit from Gaza and THEN advises Palestinian civilians to exit Gaza due to imminent Israeli attack.
This is EXACTLY the same as Russia bombarding humanitarian civilian evacuation corridors with artillery, thereby preventing civilians from fleeing areas that were facing attack.
Israeli regional policy and leadership behavior mimic that of Russia: bullying neighbors with the SAME excuse Putin uses (we've been invaded in the past), occupying territory illegally, desiring genocide against people who live in territory that Israel desires.
It's sadly ironic that Netanyahu, and many Israelis would eliminate the Palestinians altogether with a snap of their fingers if it was possible.
Take care that when hunting monsters, you yourself don't become a monster.
Again, It's similar to Putin and his Nazis. The only reason Israel doesn't outright obliterate the Palestinians is that if they did what they desire, they'd lose the moral high ground and possibly Western support. Although, America so enjoys slobbering and choking on Israeli peen that it might be too far down our throats to remove.
As with Putin, Israeli leadership enjoys having the Palestinians and HAMAS as an "existential threat to security". That one of Putin's reasons for invading Ukraine. HAMAS is a creation of bad Israeli regional policies. Israeli leadership benefits more from HAMAS than the Palestinians do because having that threat allows Israeli politicians to be the strongman and continue the cycle. That's a cycle which keeps them in power.
Israel doesn't want peace with the Palestinians. Israeli politicians are perfectly OK with Israeli civilians being killed or wounded in terrorist attacks every so often as long as this maintains status quo and enables the Israeli politicians to stay in power and propagate cycle.
There won't be peace in that region until Israel eliminates all Palestinians or the civilized world starts treating Israel like the barbaric state sponsor of terrorism that it is. Israel is both directly responsible for the killing of Palestinian women and children as well as the Israeli governments de facto support for HAMAS as described above.
As an American, it sickens me that so many people go full on Russian Sheep mode and refuse to think critically and look at the causality of the current situation and how Israeli policy is the catalyst.
Edit, more similarity with Russia
1:24 Pictures and videos online show Israel pretending they're Russia and that Gaza is Mariupol.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
I said it before, but Kherson wasn't a misinformation campaign or feint. The technical term for the Kherson operations is "dilemma".
Basically, the Kherson operation would leave Russia with 2 bad choices. 1st, Russia could divert troops to Kherson region and leave the east and northeast weaker. Or, Russia could not divert troops to Kherson, continuing its eastern attacks and northeast probing attacks, but leaving Kherson weaker.
Due to the lack of logistics due to the HIMARS removing Russian supply depots, Russia was no longer able to maintain its troops and hold on both south and east regions.
If Russia hadn't reinforced Kherson area, Ukraine simply would have pushed the Russians back to the Dnipr River and re-taken Kherson.
So, it wasn't a successful misinformation campaign, it was a successful dilemma that was going to result a huge map change either in the east, northeast, or south
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1