Comments by "Nick Strife" (@NickStrife) on "HasanAbi" channel.

@sketchyvasectomy They attacked Israel first. And it's not the first time they do it either. You are so biased it's not even funny.
16
@michaelwu7678 Imagine being a Hamas supporter in 2024.
8
@michaelwu7678 Imagine being an Arab occupier in 2024.
6
@michaelwu7678 Nah, just an adult here tired of hearing the same arguments over and over. So I do hope I just put words in your mouth. Like I said, I would like to be challenged for a change. I don't know if it helps, but sometimes i get around it by breaking my comments to a lot smaller chunks and deleting little parts of them which YT might find "bad". That way at least some of them will survive the YouTube censorship.
2
@PC-ONE Better change your name to NPC, because so does Turkey but i never saw you complaining about them.
1
Yeah sure, like Iran isn't hitting Israel non-stop with its satellite organizations. You conveniently omit the FACT the Iranian embassy was never the target but the terrorists who are paid by Iran "just happened" to have their base right next to it.
1
Yeah sure, like Iran isn't hitting Israel non-stop with its satellite organizations. You conveniently omit the FACT the Iranian embassy was never the target but the terrorists who are paid by Iran "just happened" to have their base right next to it.
1
@ratt2199 Yeah sure, like Iran isn't hitting Israel non-stop with its satellite organizations. You conveniently omit the FACT the Iranian embassy was never the target but the terrorists who are paid by Iran "just happened" to have their base right next to it.
1
@michaelwu7678 Imagine being an Islamic terrorist in 2024.
1
@ashfifidontcare4064 I've read more books than you could ever read in your pathetic life. Go read some History books and you will understand Israelis are the natives of these lands.
1
@kennybachman35 Arabs are the foreign invaders in this story.... Jokes one you! 🤣
1
@michaelwu7678 Israeli lands. Israelis have been there since 1000 BC. Arabs stole the area during 700 AD. Sorry History and morality are not on your side.. You might think human History started no more than 80 years ago, but sadly for you that's not the case..
1
@PeidosFTW Yes they did
1
@michaelwu7678 Where are the Canaanites? Nowhere.... Therefore the Canaanite argument is invalid. Sure if Cannanites existed and wanted their lands back I would have taken their side as well.
1
@michaelwu7678 Also, if your so called "Palestineans" have the right to take back "their lands" from a few decades ago, so do the Jews. You don't get a pass for stealing a land just because a certain amount of time has passed. Mr "all people are equal" guy.
1
@michaelwu7678 Also, I don't care what ill informed masses think about the subject. Your arguments lack logic or objectivity and that's all there is to it. You want a true reality check? Here comes one: There is no "historical conquest" it's just conquest. And you either support it in which case, Israelis won the most recent war and therefore this land is theirs "by right of conquest" Or You are in favour of nativism which means you take the side of whoever was there first. In which case Israel wins again. Critically thinking, the subject from multiple points of view leads to the conclusion, Israel is in the right. No matter how I see it morality and history is on the side of Israel. Your arguments are logically bankrupt and biased AF, the only way to not take Israel's side on this conflict is marking up some strange rules like "I support the borders of X period of time and I want no changes" in which I can counter again with supporting the borders of a different period of time "just because" or pointing out the borders globally have changed since 1948 anyway.
1
@michaelwu7678 Yes!!!!! That's the map straight out of a wet dream of mine.
1
@michaelwu7678 Also, I don't care what ill informed masses think about the subject. Your arguments lack logic or objectivity and that's all there is to it. You want a true reality check? Here comes one: There is no "historical conquest" it's just conquest. And you either support it in which case, Israelis won the most recent war and therefore this land is theirs "by right of conquest" Or You are in favour of nativism which means you take the side of whoever was there first. In which case Israel wins again.
1
@michaelwu7678 Your comments are deleted by YouTube which makes it hard to have a conversation here. Many of mine where I explain my reasoning in detail are deleted as well. However, because your arguments are predictable, I can already answer yo your questions. "Does that apply to America, Australia or whatever?" And yes. Yes it does!
1
@michaelwu7678 You say I am predictable but I don't see you answering anything. Whereas I did! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 So yes, it applies to USA as well. Your next line of defense please. Come on, give me something new.
1
@michaelwu7678 Also, I don't care what ill informed masses think about the subject.
1
@michaelwu7678 You want a true reality check? Here comes one: There is no "historical conquest" it's just conquest. And you either support it in which case, Israelis won the most recent war and therefore this land is theirs "by right of conquest" Or You are in favour of nativism which means you take the side of whoever was there first. In which case Israel wins again.
1
@michaelwu7678 Critically thinking, the subject from multiple points of view leads to the conclusion, Israel is in the right. No matter how I see it morality and history is on the side of Israel.
1
@michaelwu7678 The only way to not take Israel's side on this conflict is making up some strange rules like "I support the borders of X period of time and I want no changes" in which I can counter again with supporting the borders of a different period of time "just because" or pointing out many borders globally have changed since 1948 anyway.
1
@Emperorhirohito19272 Lol, I am tired of replying to the same bs that's all there is to it. Happy to see this is the only thing you have an answer for.
1
@michaelwu7678 Again, yes, if Canaanites existed they would be entitled to do just that. I don't get what's the big shocker here. These hypothetical Canaanites of yours were subjected to the exact same treatment when they got invaded. So why it's bad only when the natives employ the same tactics to get back what was stolen from them??
1
@Emperorhirohito19272 Hahahaha you still fail to explain how that's the case. Just saying my arguments are "fallacious" won't cut it. As anyone can see, this is not the only reply I have written and I have actually replied to all his arguments. But of course, reality would ruin your fragile narrative so you choose to just close your eyes and see only the comment where I tried to predict his next argument. Something I did only because I am tired of people assuming I am American. To my surprise, he had another argument, and I still gave a fair answer on it. So.... Do you have anything else to add? If not, shoo. P.S.: I am so confident on my arguments I even gave him pointers on how to avoid YouTube censorship.
1
@ThePurplePeppy Zero arguments in your ramblings as well. Glad to see you have no comeback. Follow your own advice and go touch grass.
1
@michaelwu7678 That reasoning goes both ways though. When you do that to my people expect the favor returned eventually, it doesn't matter how long it will take. It WILL be returned.
1
@ChrisGuerra31 How? Care to elaborate? You cannot? Thought so.... 🤫 Neeext. !!!
1
@michaelwu7678 Bronze Age??? I am not sure if that's simply naive or you are making really bad excuses. This is how the world still operates. Using the standards of your imaginary world, I am not responsible for the actions of the previous generations of my country but guess what, I am paying the price of their actions. Also, wanna see what happens to a society with no police? They regress back to the supposedly "Bronze Age operations" you are thinking of real quick. Now is there a world police in place? No. Which is why ethnic groups are still operating under what you call "Bronze Age morality". I could detail it more but you could just read some Thomas Hobbes and get educated in the process. You have to live by what you say, not just say it. Otherwise you are a hypocrite. If you care so much about peace and you don't like war, you don't steal other lands. And if your ancestors did it, well you still have the choice to undo their wrongdoings by returning to your original lands and leaving the land your ancestors stole to its natives. Otherwise, you directly continue their crimes in the most hypocritical way possible..
1
@michaelwu7678 Bronze Age??? I am not sure if that's simply naive or you are making really bad excuses. This is how the world still operates. Using the standards of your imaginary world, I am not responsible for the actions of the previous generations of my country but guess what, I am paying the price of their actions. Also, wanna see what happens to a society with no police? They regress back to the supposedly "Bronze Age operations" you are thinking of real quick. Now is there a world police in place? No. Which is why ethnic groups are still operating under what you call "Bronze Age morality". I could detail it more but you could just read some Thomas Hobbes and get educated in the process. You have to live by what you say, not just say it. Otherwise you are a hypocrite. If you care so much about peace and you don't like war, you don't steal other lands. And if your ancestors did it, well you still have the choice to undo their wrongdoings by returning to your original lands and leaving the land your ancestors stole to its natives. Otherwise, you directly continue their crimes in the most hypocritical way possible.
1
@michaelwu7678 Bronze Age??? I am not sure if that's simply naive or you are making really bad excuses.
1
@michaelwu7678 This is how the world still operates. Using the standards of your imaginary world, I am not responsible for the actions of the previous generations of my country but guess what, I am paying the price of their actions. Also, wanna see what happens to a society with no police? They regress back to the supposedly "Bronze Age operations" you are thinking of real quick. Now is there a world police in place? No. Which is why ethnic groups are still operating under what you call "Bronze Age morality". I could detail it more but you could just read some Thomas Hobbes and get educated in the process. You have to live by what you say, not just say it. Otherwise you are a hypocrite. If you care so much about peace and you don't like war, you don't steal other lands. And if your ancestors did it, well you still have the choice to undo their wrongdoings by returning to your original lands and leaving the land your ancestors stole to its natives. Otherwise, you directly continue their crimes in the most hypocritical way possible.
1
@michaelwu7678 This is how the world still operates. Using the standards of your imaginary world, I am not responsible for the actions of the previous generations of my country but guess what, I am paying the price of their actions.
1
@michaelwu7678 Also, wanna see what happens to a society with no police? They regress back to the supposedly "Bronze Age operations" you are thinking of real quick. Now is there a world police in place? No. Which is why ethnic groups are still operating under what you call "Bronze Age morality". I could detail it more but you could just read some Thomas Hobbes and get educated in the process.
1
@michaelwu7678 You have to live by what you say, not just say it. Otherwise you are a hypocrite. If you care so much about peace and you don't like war, you don't steal other lands. And if your ancestors did it, well you still have the choice to undo their wrongdoings by returning to your original lands and leaving the land your ancestors stole to its natives. Otherwise, you directly continue their crimes in the most hypocritical way possible.
1
@michaelwu7678 And now we established the reason it's justified let's address your little "side note". The retaliation needs to be greater in magnitude in order to send a message. That's the whole point of righting the wrong. To send the message your people are not to be trifled with..
1
@michaelwu7678 And once again, you have to look around you to realise the world hasn't changed in that regard since then. Why you think Iran said to Israel that if they attack back now their next retaliation will be even bigger? It's all about sending a message.
1
@michaelwu7678 So yeah, you don't like what your ancestors did? Rectify their actions. You don't? Prepare to pay the price.
1
@michaelwu7678 If your ancestors have committed these abhorrent actions upon my ancestors, and it's because of them I am forced to live away from my home. You better be prepared to face the same abhorrent actions one day. Your side started the cycle of violence FIRST. Which is why I am right and you are wrong. End of story. 🙂
1
@michaelwu7678 If you find these actions to be "abhorrent" you should have been in the Israeli side since today they just push back against the abhorrent actions their ancestors faced. But you don't. Because hypocrisy is real.
1
@michaelwu7678 So no, you cannot convince me that a crime stops being a crime with the passage of time. And if you really believe that. Well then, just give it some time and no one will complain about what is happening today either. Right? Right????
1
@chet_irl Why do I need the affirmation of ignorant masses? Lmao! What I need is what Israel is doing right now. You can keep crying all you want about it, but Israel is winning. And that's all that matters at the end of the day despite of your hypocritical feelings.
1
@chet_irl And where is your empathy for the people who have been living in exile for 2000 years while some others were on their land and now these others claim it's theirs somehow?
1
@rodolfodoce Am I? You are the one supporting terrorists groups, occupiers and invaders. Not me.
1
@chet_irl Oh! And one last thing, I comment all day because It's amusing how NONE OF YOU has any legit counterarguments whatsoever. Not because I need your affirmation! 🤣
1
@putra4101 Yeah sure, like Iran isn't hitting Israel non-stop with its satellite organizations. You conveniently omit the FACT the Iranian embassy was never the target but the terrorists who are paid by Iran "just happened" to have their base right next to it.
1