Comments by "Ola Palooza" (@1001Balance) on "Tech Chasm" channel.

  1. @ it mentions security assurances given by Russia and the US. So what are these? Dec. 5, 1994: Russia, Ukraine, United States, and the United Kingdom sign the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances Includes security assurances against the threat or use of force against Ukraine’s territory or political independence
    5
  2. Yep, that is when Ukraine agreed to handover their nukes in exchange for US protection. Another nice American promise. Never sign a contract with Americans. They betray you the next day. Even China is more reliable.
    1
  3. @ as usual it were political commitments not legally enforceable. the United States publicly maintains that "the Memorandum is not legally binding", calling it a "political commitment".
    1
  4. @ I agree. The American handshake is vile and poisonous. Do we have to admit China is right? Crazy
    1
  5. @ correct. In court it will not hold. But such political commitments used to mean something. The US is an unreliable ally. Earlier just to get European boots in Korea, supporting the invasion of Iraq. And now the main reason for NATO are US arm sales. Guess what Lockheed And consorts can stick it.
    1
  6. What he showed is that he is a puppet. He couldn’t answer the real questions, just referring to the mango Mussolini. That is what you get with DEI hires.
    1
  7. Get a job, stop begging
    1