General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Lavender Eucalyptus
Glenn Diesen
comments
Comments by "Lavender Eucalyptus" (@lavendereucalyptus3225) on "" video.
The biggest difference between Mearsheimer and Sachs on China. Sachs has deep understanding and knowledge in China. Mearsheimer doesn’t and never seemed interested in.
53
He’s a pseudo intellectual. Inconsistent and hypocritical. I agree with him on Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Palestine, but when it comes to China, he gave up his logics and facts. Such inconsistency is losing his credibility and intellectual integrity. Too bad, he has so much to offer on other topics, but on China, I hear a harsh deafening squeaking friction from his break peddle by him taking a sudden U turn on his logical sense.
8
@cogito9350 Most of China’s neighboring countries proper as China prosper, as the ASEAN countries, yes they have positive view of China unless they are U.S. vassal states like S Korea, Japan, Philippine, another one is a Chinese province Taiwan is also under U.S. proxy project in the region.
7
Police is supposed to catch the criminals and put them in jail, what if the police themselves are criminals?
6
I love watching Glenn’s interviews. 👍 I know Glenn from watching CGTN, he was often invited on CGTN. Glad he now has his own channel.
6
He is an advocate for US global imperialism, no doubt. And the reason he sympathizes Russia in hopes that Russia can ally with US to gang up on China. He is a Cold War old school playbook from the Grand Chess Board.
5
Don’t be fooled by his self proclaimed ‘realist theory”. He is a pseudo intellect. He is NOT a realist, if he is a realist, he would have acknowledged the FACT that China has risen PEACEFULLY for over 45 years of no war. YET, he is still making stupid question like “I’ve always questioned IF China would rise peacefully.”, as if he is still living and speaking in 1979, ignoring the historic records from 1979 to today. Ignoring facts really hurts his credibility and to take his analysis of China seriously.
5
Mearsheimer is an insidious snake, he goes around bad mouthing China, such a disgraceful pseudo intellectual.
3
Don’t be fooled by his self proclaimed ‘realist theory”. He is a pseudo intellect. He is NOT a realist, if he is a realist, he would have acknowledged the FACT that China has risen PEACEFULLY for over 45 years of no war. YET, he is still making stupid question like “I’ve always questioned IF China would rise peacefully.”, as if he is still living and speaking in 1979, ignoring the historic records from 1979 to today. Ignoring facts really hurts his credibility and to take his analysis of China seriously.
3
I love watching his interviews. 👍 I know Glenn from watching CGTN, he was often invited on CGTN. Glad he now has his own channel.
3
@MKSSMK-r5y China has ONE military base in Africa, it purposed to protect its investment from sea pirate. US has over 800 military bases around the world, including 400 encircling China. Don’t be a laughing stock and embarrass yourself with your nonsensical ignorance.
2
Everything Mearsheimer projects China may or may not do, or making accusation of what China did, IS WESTERN IMPERIAL SELF PROJECTION. Because the west is using their own psychological mentality to assume what China ‘would do’ if someday China becomes the most powerful. And he conveniently totally ignore Chinese historic records, cultures and philosophies. There is reason why an old civilization like China appreciate the wisdom of coexistence, stability and peace.
2
John is 100% WRONG here. John is too lazy to study Chinese history, culture and philosophy. Keep in mind, China has repeatedly made clear: As long as what has historically and legally belonged to China’s sovereignty and territory, China will NOT make concessions. As long as what has historically and legally NOT belonged to China’s sovereignty and territory, China will NOT plunder it. Not like some western barbarian countries, go around the world to invade and loot and kill. There is NO comparison to the amount of sins that the west has sowed and committed in last 500 years of colonialism through cultural and population genocide of indigenous people. The reason the west launched another lying propaganda about Xinjiang G side, so that they can say “look! We are not the only ones being evil, look what China did to Xinjiang. China is just as evil as we are, see see!” The west has always been the war mongers, it’s in their DNA.
2
Mearsheimer is an imperial war hawk, a war hawk can not be the ‘greatest’ international scholar of our time, far fetched.
2
@MKSSMK-r5y China has ONE military base in Africa, it purposed to protect its investment from sea pirate. US has over 800 military bases around the world, including 400 encircling China. You are making up a big pile of💩, no one takes you serious! 😆😂😂
1
Jeffrey Sachs can comprehend. 👍
1
@MKSSMK-r5y John is 100% WRONG here. John is too lazy to study Chinese history, culture and philosophy. Keep in mind, China has repeatedly made clear: As long as what has historically and legally belonged to China’s sovereignty and territory, China will NOT make concessions. As long as what has historically and legally NOT belonged to China’s sovereignty and territory, China will NOT plunder it. Not like some western barbarian countries, go around the world to invade and loot and kill. There is NO comparison to the amount of sins that the west has sowed and committed in last 500 years of colonialism through cultural and population genocide of indigenous people. The reason the west launched another lying propaganda about Xinjiang G side, so that they can say “look! We are not the only ones being evil, look what China did to Xinjiang. China is just as evil as we are, see see!” The west has always been the war mongers, it’s in their DNA.
1
@MKSSMK-r5y John is 100% wrong, he’s a dishonest misinformed pseudo intellectual. He should be ashamed!
1
@shantanushekharsjunerft9783 All the places you mentioned are US geopolitical proxies in that region, they are allies of US, therefore they serve US for US geopolitical interest. Especially Philippines are being used as a provocation in SCS to stir troubles to provoke China, so Philippine will bring international press to the scene to take photos and video footages to tell lies that they are being bullied by the Chinese ships, it’s all staged purposely to set China up, and the black hand puppeteer pulling the strings behind the scene is United States.
1
China has ONE military base in Africa, it purposed to protect its investment from sea pirate. US has over 800 military bases around the world, including 400 encircling China. Don’t be a laughing stock and embarrass yourself with your nonsensical ignorance.
1
He’s a pseudo intellectual. Inconsistent and hypocritical. I agree with him on Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Palestine, but when it comes to China, he gave up his logics and facts. Such inconsistency is losing his credibility and intellectual integrity. Too bad, he has so much to offer on other topics, but on China, I hear a harsh deafening squeaking friction from his break peddle by him taking a sudden U turn on his logical sense.
1
@blackcatdungeonmastersfami5311 Sachs is extremely knowledgable on China. You and Mearsheimer are extremely ignorant on China, and it’s deliberate willful ignorance.
1