Comments by "Phil Aypee (Philip Potter)" (@philaypeephilippotter6532) on "National Geographic" channel.

  1. It is likely that little was stolen from Tutankhamun's tomb as most of it belongs to the Egyptian nation and is still there. I believe that all the relics found by the current Earl of Carnarvon at Highclere Castle have been or are being returned. Many such relics are not catalogued and their whereabouts is actually unknown. Caenarvon actually found one, I think a scarab, at the back of a kitchen drawer!
    238
  2. They are at peace. You can't get any more peaceful than dead.
    92
  3.  Ryon Worthy  Museums are about history.
    33
  4.  @MARKOUTTV  The greater amount of the BM's collection is either being researched or in storage. Museums are not solely about display and many are not even mostly about display.
    29
  5.  @curtcoller3632  Absolutely. There would be nothing at all in the London Museum of History. In fact there is nothing at all in it as there is no such place.
    23
  6.  @rivaiva3130  No.
    22
  7.  Ryon Worthy  You posted to me Lol well obviously the british museum is only interested in other peoples history which is why not a single artifact can be found in the museum that displays british history. This is demonstrably untrue and I posted links to demonstrate that. I could have posted more links. Am I lying? Are those links a lie? I know you haven't the grace to apologise and I don't expect that but you might at least acknowledge that I did tell the truth.
    19
  8.  Ryon Worthy  No.
    18
  9.  @bunzeebear2973  Actually the British, French, German, American, etc., archæologists are there at the request of the Egyptian government as there is vastly too much archæology in Egypt for the Egyptian archæologists to cope with. If they could cope the foreign archæologists wouldn't be there.
    13
  10.  @jmr1920  Virtually all the tombs had been plundered millennia before 🇬🇧 existed.
    7
  11.  @duaamishra4908  That it is what archæologists do, at least in 🇬🇧. In places like Egypt it's more complex but the same principles are applied - dig, learn, conserve.
    5
  12.  @madeyogiartha6363  William Shakespeare, democracy, William Wilberforce, railways, J. M. W. Turner and cricket are just a few other things in British history. Britain hasn't been invaded in nearly 1,000 years. When was Indonesia last invaded?
    4
  13.  @adamclayton9960  In London not so long ago a redevelopment scheme well under way found that there was an old Saxon graveyard under where the pilings were to go. To complete the redevelopment the owners paid for a proper archæological evaluation and then most of the corpses were lifted (with due ceremony and in the presence of an Anglican priest) and relocated in a consecrated graveyard. A few could be left in situ and were. Was that reasonable by your lights?
    3
  14. @SOANE SOAKAI (Student) So there is a London Museum of History. Wow. What's its address? Is it near the British Museum? Or do you mean the London Museum, the museum that was purely about London. The museum that was merged with the Guildhall Museum to form the Museum of London that is also purely about London. There is no London Museum of History.
    3
  15.  @shreyapandey2005  So no other country has any Pharaonic Egyptian artefacts? Not Italy, France, Spain, the USA, *Germany, Holland and Belgium? Yet all these countries are proud of their entirely fictitious collections of Pharaonic Egyptian artefacts. You know nothing of history and nothing of archæology and nothing of museums.
    3
  16. But surely it likes us? After all it looks our way all the time!
    2
  17.  @yanijen9733  and in many cases they've already been disturbed, often centuries or millennia ago.
    2
  18.  @user-ol3ss3wi8f  Apart from a very few items that the the Lord Carnarvon took with him back to 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 everything was left in Egypt. It is all still owned by Egypt and is usually in the Cairo Museum or in the tomb. The few trinkets found in 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 have been repatriated by the current Lord Carnarvon. If anything else is found it will be repatriated.
    2
  19. You really need to check on how archæologists treat burials and grave-goods because you quite obviously have no idea at all!
    2
  20. Can you see daddy?
    2
  21. It's close to Coptic.
    2
  22. As opposed to an artificial satellite.
    2
  23.  @redireseFM  An artificial satellite is an object that has been intentionally placed into orbit. These objects are called artificial satellites to distinguish them from natural satellites such as Earth's Moon or Phobos, Titan and Ganymede.
    2
  24. @Apple TV and some call it Luna.
    2
  25. Archæologists, at least most of them, prefer to treat burials with respect. In 🇬🇧, where I live, there are many burials at risk from plough.and builders. Where necessary burials are relocated while others are protected properly. Pharaonic Egypt was far more densely populated than 🇬🇧 and even ordinary folk were buried with great ceremony, often with valuable grave goods. These grave goods were usually plundered in antiquity by grave-robbers for profit. To call archæologists grave-robbers is an undeserved calumny. In the 🇬🇧 we protect burials that haven't been plundered by studying them and all are reburied safely, usually in consecrated ground. I'm aware that this is impractical in many countries but the same principles usually apply. Certainly they apply in Egypt today.
    2
  26.  @fiire_bug  For millennia there have been tomb robbers taking wealth from the tombs of Pharaonic Egypt, sometimes within weeks of the tomb being sealed.
    2
  27. Yes and money.
    2
  28. The fairly bad dig is mentioned but John Aubrey's records long before are extant - the Aubrey Holes are named for him. The Vatican had nothing to do with it as Britain was no longer RC at the time.
    1
  29. Stargate's pyramid ships?
    1
  30.  @justjax6000  They didn't use slaves, they simply used a A frame, an engineering tool they knew all about. A frames are still used today.
    1
  31.  @arah8998  They used an A frame.
    1
  32. Actually it was a funerary site.
    1
  33. Using an engineering structure called an A frame they can - and they knew about A frames even then.
    1
  34. There is only one apparent astronomical alignment though it seems likely that it was deliberate.
    1
  35. The people who desecrate the bodies are those who steal the grave-goods to sell them for profit. Archæologists don't do that, they conserve, preserve and respect the bodies.
    1
  36. It is not that common now as more damage can be and often is done by gloved hands than otherwise.
    1
  37. Why?
    1
  38. Do you enjoy being an idiot? I wouldn't.
    1
  39.  @jayregal6478  A devilish theft? I wonder what that means? Is it wrong for people to want to learn about other cultures? Is it all meant to be a secret? You seem to believe so. Pharaonic Egypt was a huge culture that dominated the civilised world for millennia but only Africans have any right to know about the artefacts. Not the Egyptians whose ancestors made many of them, not the Mediterranean cultures that learnt from the Egyptians but just the Africans. You really are an idiot if you really believe that tommyrot. You probably don't understand archæology or the heritage it offers the world.
    1
  40. There are indeed. But I can't explain Gibberish as, like you, I don't speak that language. Sorry.
    1
  41.  @tangybuttfrogfpv8772  The words may be English but not the rest of the language.
    1
  42. They had machinery.
    1
  43.  @4funrc11  That's just about all that gold was used for there and then.
    1
  44. You need an add-on to your browser. If you use FireFox there are many such.
    1
  45.  @XariksBeatbox  Which museum?
    1
  46.  @pookieluv1  All what?
    1
  47.  @pookieluv1  Everything?
    1
  48.  @pookieluv1  And if those things were paid for?
    1
  49.  @pookieluv1  I don't know what you meant to write but I'm sure that it wasn't elongated.
    1
  50. Cost.
    1
  51. Drowning in the Valley of the Kings?
    1
  52.  @norcoextreme666  Have you looked?
    1
  53.  @norcoextreme666  That's not a reply to my question. Have you actually seen evidence of archæologists profiting from their finds? Have you even seen evidence that Zahi Hawass, who is almost certainly corrupt, has profited from Egyptian archæology? If you actually have seen such evidence you should post any relevant links here and report your findings the the relevant police force. But if you can't do this then all you have is anecdote and rumour, probably untrue.
    1
  54. I can't understand it either.
    1
  55. Get an ad-blocker.
    1
  56. The people who desecrate the bodies are those who steal the grave-goods to sell them for profit. Archæologists don't do that, they conserve, preserve and respect the bodies.
    1
  57. But those tombs weren't peaceful for thousands of years. The grave-robbing started not long after the first tomb was finished. That's why Tutankhamun's tomb was so important - the grave-robbers hadn't been able to plunder it.
    1
  58. I'm afraid that that's a myth.
    1
  59.  @abed9267  No. They just died from what were normal reasons after living an ordinary length of time. There was nothing weird about it. Lord Carnarvon died shortly after the tomb from an infected mosquito bite. Nobody else involved in opening or investigating the tomb died in the next ten years. Some didn't die for another half-a-century.
    1
  60. Great. Others want to steal your your history because they think, wrongly, that they have none.
    1
  61. Wrong.
    1
  62. No.
    1
  63. I'm afraid you're wrong. Archæology today is about conservation, not destruction and certainly not grave-robbing. The actual grave-robbers are those who only care about profit. That's why conservation is important - to protect this stuff.
    1
  64. Abir NiGam posted and quickly deleted "Phil Potter 😂😆 let me guess... British???😆". There was no need for him to guess. If he'd asked I'd have told him. Asian, European, African and USA American.
    1
  65.  @abirnigam8816  If YT deleted your post how was I able to quote it? If YT deleted it when you posted it why would they let me post it again? So much for conspiracy theory. Incidentally you have chosen to ignore my post about my antecedents. I wonder why? Are you ashamed of yours? You know nothing about archæology as you have made abundantly clear. You seem to know a bit about grave-robbing though. Are you an expert in that kind of crime?
    1
  66.  @FelixHdez  In English it gives it's name to Monday and the French for that is Lundi. In most Germanic languages it's usually a variant on Monday while in most Romance languages it's a variant on Lundi.
    1
  67. Nice to see you're so open-minded!
    1
  68. That sounds about right to me.
    1
  69. Really? So all the archæologists should consult you about their speciality? Are you qualified to advise them? Can you provide any evidence for your claims? Why am I asking you anything?
    1
  70.  @vendettamedianl  So how many qualified and respected archæologists specializing in Egyptology agree with your hypothesis? I'd guess none. You are wrong. Archæologists have found many anomalies and are actively investigating. One of the many things they have disproven conclusively is that the Great Pyramid is some kind of electrical device. The Sphinx may predate Khufu's pyramid but only by a few centuries, not millennia.
    1
  71. More so.
    1
  72. The people who desecrate the bodies are those who steal the grave-goods to sell them for profit. Archæologists don't do that, they conserve, preserve and respect the bodies.
    1
  73. The people who desecrate the bodies are those who steal the grave-goods to sell them for profit. Archæologists don't do that, they conserve, preserve and respect the bodies.
    1
  74.  @GioFransesca  So you are quite sure that you know better than the archæologists and historians who've studied the pyramids and who, between them, have centuries of experience and knowledge?
    1
  75.  @GioFransesca  In one sense you are, of course, right. The archæologists and historians who study Pharaonic Egypt know far more than I. Obviously they know far less than you - in your own rather arrogant opinion. But perhaps you are right and I have simply missed your ground-breaking research. Or maybe your research hasn't been published yet. Nevertheless there should surely be references to it in the academic literature - perhaps you could provide references to such academic papers? But I doubt you can. Your speculation is not evidence of any kind. You think you know better than the real experts who have spent decades studying the pyramids simply because of your arrogance. Oh, and I have researched personally the technology required to build the pyramids, including the copper saws and drills. It is quite up to the task of building the pyramids - ask any engineer worth his salt. Experiment has proved it works.
    1
  76.  @GioFransesca  So, and as expected, you have no argument.
    1
  77.  @GioFransesca  So, and as expected, you have no argument.
    1
  78.  @GioFransesca  So, and as expected, you have no argument. In consequence your theories can be discarded and the Egyptologists theories stand.
    1
  79. Who are?
    1
  80. Desiccation.
    1
  81. Schliemann learnt better and became a good archæologist before he died.
    1
  82. Codswallop.
    1
  83. The documentary was made years before CoVid19 was known.
    1
  84.  @nautilus3074  Hey! A spotlight bulb just fell from the sky. Is there an electricity supply up there?
    1