Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "CBS Mornings" channel.

  1. Get away with what? Having teen sex? Give me a break. Th whole thing is so ridiculous.
    10
  2. @Emma Cabot I think we've had this discussion on another thread. As I stated, legally he was found innocent of rape. So were do we want to go with this?
    5
  3.  @charliewinstonberg9884  Also, I don't think he got off easy. Statutory rape between teens is considered a misdemeanor offense in most states. So I wouldn't have expected an excessive sentence whether you're white or not.
    3
  4. You are using the wrong yardstick. For mail-in , you have to have effectively cast your vote by Nov. 3 or it wont be counted.
    2
  5. You're providing rhetoric, not evidence. That's what Trump voters are all about I guess.
    2
  6.  @Sovereign-of-silly  Well as I said, I am not completely ruling out a missile. -Navy conducting exercises: I'm aware there were Navy ships in the general area, and claims of a naval exercise. But I don't recall ever seeing a proof there was an ongoing exercise. Can you direct me to that proof? -no 747s grounded: first off, this was not considered a 747-specific fault. 2nd, and directly because of this and other CWT events, fuel-inerting systems have since been required on new commercial aircraft. So the claim is not quite accurate or relevant. -tons of 747s have been standing in the same hot conditions with their AC on and none of them exploded?: This is the "only time" argument. But there have been others too: 9/11 was unique, no matter how you slice it. Same for Air France 447. UA 585 was so unique at the time that it was unsolved until another crash happened. The odds were millions to one. The dive of TWA 841 has never been replicated no matter which scenario you go with. Many other examples of one-offs exist, such as the BA 777 crash landing in London. Birginair was a first, and so was Aeroperu 757 crash. You can also make the same argument with the shoot down theory: first time in history US Navy friendly fire in the US off a major city. - but it's not explosive: Yes, but the argument is that the vapors were volatile. Different scenario. I've researched this and there's plenty of evidence that fuel vapors are indeed flammable. So that's another misconception.
    2
  7. If it makes you happy, OK.
    2
  8.  @Sovereign-of-silly  Well you got me there!
    2
  9. In every election dead people vote. Computer errors occur. Ballots get thrown out by mistake, or are overlooked. What all these Trump supports don't seem to understand is the nature of evidence. Dredging up every last tidbit of error, they demonstrate their inability to show us the proof that Trump won the election. His claim is, quite literally, pulled from thin air.
    2
  10. Like everyone with a brain has been saying, SHOW US THE EVIDENCE, not of minor fraud and errors, which happens in EVERY election, but WIDESPREAD fraud. Are we asking too much? Is it unreasonable to ask for proof?
    1
  11. There's not a shred of evidence that there has been a conspiracy involving at least 3 states that massive and widespread voter fraud occurred, capable of overturning the election. It's pure fantasy driven by a shameless conman. Move ahead with your life.
    1
  12. Please provide the proof Dominion software was used to rig the election. Go ahead, give us the proof. The fact republican officials, such as the Pennsylvania judge who ruled against Giuliani, are themselves refusing to go along with Trump's psychotic dreams tells one a lot more than Sidney Powell's bizarre fantasies of a Martian invasion spearheaded by Elvis and the tooth fairy. Go ahead, embrace lunacy if it makes you feel empowered.
    1
  13. Well, I see no reason to think this. Even Cathy Young, perhaps Woody's staunchest supporter in the media, doesn't think she's lying either. Some times we see what we want to see. There's no real smoking gun in her performance.
    1
  14. You expect anyone to watch a 12 hour video?
    1
  15.  @markcrane2436  Give me the best 5 minutes and I'll watch it.
    1
  16. Good catch. But it's the kind of error that happens in every election. Rather than dredging up every last inconsequential mistake, why not provide the long awaited proof of widespread voter fraud. The fact you can only come up with this tends to confirm the obvious. The proof is nonexistent. Keep on dreamin.
    1
  17. Especially the least trustworthy elements. Like truth sites.
    1
  18. All that's missing is the evidence.
    1
  19. Just curious what would allow you to vote for a psychopath. Certainly the president's most recent behavior makes this rather undeniable. Even the Pentagon is alarmed, according to the latest headlines. And, if there really were such massive evidence of voter fraud, the media would all be flooded with it. There would be no reason to keep it secret. Giuliani would have long ago presented it.
    1
  20.  @black1582  I'll take a read and give you my thoughts.
    1
  21. You have no proof. That's what this is all about. Some people go by proof. Some go by dreaming. Keep on dreamin.
    1
  22. Keep on dreamin. The Georgia hand recount proves the machines were accurate. Let's even agree investigations into Dominion is warranted. That does not constitute proof of massive voter fraud. No one has provided the smoking gun. Not even close.
    1
  23.  @ebt-evolutionbasketballtra9119  I watched, and I am concerned like I am about all of our other vulnerable infrastructure. We are vulnerable to countless hacking weakness in cybersecurity, power plants air traffic control, you name it. None of these unpleasant facts contradicts the fact that there's no proof of massive voter fraud as of November 28. cheers
    1
  24.  @ebt-evolutionbasketballtra9119  So you admit the proof is not yet in. Thank you. Now this Powell character is so whacked that even Trump disowned her. When a psychopath of biblical proportions wants to distance himself from Powell, what does that tell you? You are embracing crackpots.
    1
  25. Perhaps he is. But if he was legitimately found not guilty of 1st degree rape, why should he go to jail? A 3 -year age difference makes you a predator? That's the part of the law that is silly, and indeed is rapidly changing as more and more states adopt age-difference clauses in their laws. What, you have to be exactly the same age to not be a rapist? It borders on the absurd imo.
    1
  26. Maybe. But when you consider many of the details, the shoot down is also not without its problems, prime among them the unaccounted for 30-40 seconds by witnesses, suggesting a late stage event that looked a lot like fireworks.
    1
  27. All that's missing is the proof.
    1
  28. Zero evidence he's lying. No wonder you support Trump. He has successfully brainwashed you.
    1
  29. The truth is, you have no proof.
    1
  30. Well I would make an exception for Bryan getting 12 years. The reason for me is that he was not working totally in concert with Travis. It was Travis, not Bryan, who made the decision to aim a weapon at Arbery. I am fine with Bryan getting some jail time. But would you also give him 12 years had there been no shooting?
    1
  31. I'll go there, but in the meantime could you give even one example of widespread voter fraud they mentioned?
    1
  32.  @damaz5799  Just watched a woman continuing the technique of brainwashing Trump has perfected. She mentioned zero evidence in support of widespread voter fraud. Seriously, is this the best you can do?
    1
  33. And here is a great post showing the amount of proof of widespread voter fraud: 0
    1
  34.  @charliewinstonberg9884  I agree he acted badly, if not deplorably. IMO he probably did commit rape, as the victim is writing a book about it, and you don't do that sort of thing if you're lying. But the evidence in court was not strong enough. As to the issue of statutory rape, it depends on where one personally draws the line with age differences. But what I totally disagree with is using the stalking laws here. That is patently ridiculous, and an abuse of the law. They already knew each other ! And lifetime sex offender registry is just totally excessive, to me at least.
    1
  35. Like this one? https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2020-03-09/sanders-biden-michigan-sprint-to-the-finish
    1
  36.  @themorosepittbull257  What you keep overlooking, from what I see above, is that the Ms admitted through their lawyer that they could not positively ID Arbery. The lawyer stated that Greg M described his that decision to make a citizen's arrest was based on a "hunch." The Ms did not know Arbery had been in the house before he ran by. Do you admit that the McMichaels could not positively ID Arbery?
    1
  37.  @themorosepittbull257  Hmm, never heard that term before.
    1
  38.  @themorosepittbull257  OK, I get it, thanks. But here's the thing, there's nothing dumb about JJ and Lillia's posts. Tell me where the dumb factor is in her/his posts. The facts are spot on. I see this poster as having an extreme interest in the story, and being very lawyer like about precise definitions. Maybe that seems excessive to some. But how does that ad up to a 50 cent Army, or indeed any type of troll?
    1
  39.  @themorosepittbull257  "Is it legal in Georgia to detain a criminal?" If you mean citizen's arrest, they outlawed it after this event. It was allowed at the time, but it doesn't appear the Ms met the criteria for conducting one. That's been hotly debated, but having read the statute over and over, my opinion is they [edit] did not have this right. As Gregory said, it was based on a "hunch." Do you have the right to pursue a citizens arrest based on a hunch? I hope not.
    1
  40. Why would you want to support a psychopath, one who invents claims literally out of thin air, like massive voter fraud? How does that work? Why do you believe in verified garbage?
    1
  41. Keep on dreamin
    1
  42. You have aptly described the situation. I agree wholeheartedly - no evidence of widespread fraud.
    1
  43. Show us evidence of widespread fraud. Otherwise why not just say there's widespread fraud in every election.
    1
  44. ​ @glennprice5569  You can't prove widespread fraud by what happened to a few friends. BTW, what was the exact nature of the fraud she witnesses?
    1
  45.  @Alexander-the-Mediocre  And his supporters too apparently cannot tell the difference between a mere suspicion and actual evidence. It's a sad time for America.
    1
  46.  @Alexander-the-Mediocre  This IMO is an unprecedented moment in US history. Perhaps for the first time we are witnessing the direct undeniable proof that half of America (US at least) is literally crazy. They cannot distinguish claims from proofs, civility from poor sportsmanship, dignity and poise from vulgarity. The basic mental capacity to discern reality from fantasy is missing. Never before have I seen anything like this on this scale. Have you? As USA Today said today, he does not behave the way rational, normal people behave. To declare victory on the basis of a mere suspicion is mental illness. His followers have been taken in by a con man who resembles a telemarketer more than a President. And in the above I am not using hyperbole. This is literally a rational balanced conclusion.
    1
  47.  @Alexander-the-Mediocre  And the irony is that he and Melania were hoping to lose in 2016, at least according to Michael Wolff's book, Fire and Fury.
    1
  48. So why did they remotely fly a plane into the dirt in Shanksville rather than into a building? Does that make an iota of sense, even for a twoofer?
    1
  49. Possibly.
    1
  50.  @Sovereign-of-silly  Not in my book. Discussion welcome.
    1
  51.  @Sovereign-of-silly  Like I said, you can make for a case for amissile. You can also make a case there was no missile "They're flammable yes but why did it violently explode instead of starting a fire on board?" They already did a test proving it can happen. It's on a Youtube video series called Best Evidence. "Also even if it wasn't the 747s fault, they still would be needed to be grounded" There would be nothing new there. Witness the 737Max. Even after the SECOND crash, the FAA still said there wasn't enough evidence to ground the plane. As to witnesses, the main problem I have is they don't match the known event timeline. This is especially true for Fred Meyer, for example. He and his fellow pilots all agreed it took just 10 seconds for the massive fireball to hit the ocean. That suggests a late stage event. My own theory, shared by the NTSB, is that few if any saw the initial explosion at 13,000 ft. It was not until the plane dropped to about 6,000 ft that a huge fireball occurred, which is what drew people to look at the sky. As William Tobin put it, the explosion could have been the culmination of an omni-directional explosion. Imagine a falling firework as streaks of light continue to shoot upwards. The entire event was about 50 seconds, but the witness statements don't seem to corroborate a 30 second gap between the end of the streak and an explosion.
    1
  52.  @Sovereign-of-silly  Here's the Best Evidence link https://youtu.be/zwWzRFsrqAE see 31:30
    1
  53. Bad idea. Then the votes are much more prone to fraud and manipulation by hackers!!!!!! Also, they tried computer voting in Switzerland. You know what happened? Voting went way down, probably because what motivates many to vote is to be seen in person by their peers as having a civic conscience. See the book Freaconomics for more.
    1
  54. Fake claims of voter fraud. Is there any real difference? They are all liars. It's just that Trump is the biggest of all the liars at present.
    1
  55. I expect nothing less from the people who brought us DT. Dead from the neck up.
    1
  56. How do you know the voting authorities have not - in general -been doing their jobs properly by weeding out illegal votes? What is driving this?
    1
  57. The only thing that's been blatant and in your face is minor glitches of the system; and Trump's baldface lies about voting fraud. Help me understand how a lack of proof is the yardstick you and others use to determine the truth. By your standards, the total truth only emerges when the sum total of evidence reaches absolute zero. Go for it.
    1
  58.  @CheerfulFerryBoat-ug8gr  That makes you a pretty dark person.
    1
  59.  @jimmymcjimmy9743  How do I sleep? If I'm having trouble, I start counting truthers and then laugh myself into a quiet slumber.
    1
  60. But not nearly enough to seriously question the election results. That's the key point omitted in your post.
    1
  61. Maybe they take their cue from the master psychopath himself? Trump - the man who made lying, incivility, vulgarianism, the trashing of servicemen, the respectability of dispensing with proof, and indeed the darkest sides of human nature, into an art form. Not to mention sexual predator.
    1
  62. @Emma Cabot What are your thoughts on the computer emails if you'd care to share them?
    1
  63. Another big lie is the failure of missile theorists to consider the evidence that clashes with their views. Prime among it being the witness descriptions don't account for the roughly 40 seconds between the initiating event and the huge fireball.
    1
  64. "SO DONT SAY HE MISTAKENLY TAUGHT HE HAD A TAKE OFF CLEARANCE" That's EXACTLY what it was. A mistake. No pilot in his right mind would risk his reputation, risk being turned in by his crew, losing his license and going to jail. Absurd.
    1
  65. There's no basis for the claims, any more than in any other election. What's driving this is pure belief, and the Trump claim literally pulled from thin air. Let's make a deal. Trump releases his taxes in exchange for a recount. Fair?
    1
  66. You are a victim of mass brainwashing.
    1
  67. How do we know there was WIDESPREAD voter fraud? Only a brainwashed person is capable of maintaining this fraudulent claim, literally pulled out of thin air. But that's Trump for you. The more he lies, the more his supporters believe.
    1
  68. Happens in every election.
    1
  69.  @shortydp8523  And we should not accept as the norm an irresponsible president refusing to concede on the basis of a mere suspicion.
    1
  70.  @shortydp8523  I'm happy to be patient. I have nothing against recounts and investigations if that's what it takes. But it doesn't change the fact that the President spoke irresponsibly. Neither he nor you nor I know what the outcome of a thorough investigation will be. If he were responsible he would have said, "I don't believe the results, but I conditionally concede pending the outcome of legal challenges." By refusing to go along with the transition process as we await, he's being a total poor sport. he is acting unpresidential and has directed all his energy at throwing a tantrum rather than running the country. It's more of the same lack of classiness and dignity that are his hallmark signatures.
    1
  71.  @shortydp8523  Finally, keep in mind the President has literally pulled this fraud claim out of thin air. It' based on a "theoretical" suspicion that mail in is ripe with voter fraud; and his lack of numeracy. Anyone remotely familiar with statistics should know that the swing in PA after the evening of Nov 3 is oftne the way numbers behave, and especially so as it's clear that the mail-ins were largely Biden folk. So to take a theoretical suspicion, partly based on a poor grasp of mathematics, and shove that down America's throat and having this big big fit, is pure absurdism. It's to take speculation and elevate it to the status of certainty. This is pure hubris.
    1
  72.  @shortydp8523  There are rational fits and delusional fits. What's going on is mass psychosis. An absurd fantasy embraced by millions. Brainwashing in its purest form. The real question is, how do so many allegedly sane folk like yourself get taken in by a conman? He has as much credibility as a telemarketer. And you fall for it.
    1
  73. It's the children who fall for Trump's lies. The massive voter fraud is a huge lie. If it's true, he would long ago have presented the proof.
    1
  74.  @torayantondoku3662  Yes I agree. The lie part is his stating the massive voter fraud is verified fact, when he has no access to investigative results. Further, it's a claim essentially pulled from thin air. Oh yes, conspiracy theories always start with kernels of truth -a thousand votes missed here, Dominion's left leaning ties there. But to get from this to Trump's big lie is where we separate the men from the boys. The DT crowd are kids throwing a tantrum. The Biden crowd, despite all their obvious flaws, are at least adults.
    1
  75.  @torayantondoku3662  I say fine, and if no proof is uncovered, the Trump supporters pay the costs of the investigations..
    1
  76. There is no evidence yet of widespread voter fraud capable of overturning the election. Maybe you have inside information the rest of us lack. More likely, you don't understand the nature of evidence. Just wishful dreams and Venezualan invasions. Go for it. The Martians are coming too BTW.
    1
  77.  @Kentucky_Blue  The main point I am making is that if you want to be serious, you have to have substantial evidence of a rigged election. What do we have? We have 1) a video showing only 4 people turned up for a Biden rally. 2) little tidbits of irregularities here, some fraud there 3) Trump goes from 100s of thousand of votes on election night, to tens of thousands of votes behind a few days later. All these may raise legitimate questions, and warranted more detailed investigation than was actually done. That may well be true. But to use 1-3 above as a basis for declaring a stolen election is the stuff of conspiracism: you start with a few kernels of truth. And then without anything remotely resembling a rigorous analysis, declare it a fact the election was stolen. Serious people reject this tabloid style methodology. The conspiratorial mind doesn't understand the nature of evidence. It falls for tabloid logic. Not saying you fall into that category. But that's my working hypoythesis for most of the rigged election folk.
    1
  78. "I know someone" is worthless words. Why even bother posting.
    1
  79. Because the evidence of major fraud either this time round or any other recent presidential election is pretty weak.
    1
  80. Trump was once democrat too. He also has 26 charges of sexual misconduct hanging over him, he trashed our veterans and lies to their families, and pulls the claim of mass voter fraud from thin air. And he gives a free pass to murderer's Putin and the Saudi Crown Prince. It doesn't get more disgusting and vile as that. DT takes all of the darkest features of humanity and rolls them into one.
    1
  81.  @ejzabojnik834  Biden I am sure is corrupt. But he's not a psychopath. And theirin lies the all important distinction.
    1
  82. Whatever mess it may be, there's no proof of widespread voter fraud on offer at the moment. That's a fact, regardless of whatever else you believe.
    1
  83. Flight 93 refutes that.
    1
  84.  @jimmymcjimmy9743  And flown by Elvis. Because you say so.
    1
  85. Hardly. His career is more or less ruined.
    1
  86. The only book I found under that name on Amazon is by Randall Brooke. What are your main pieces of evidence?
    1
  87. There is always some degree of fraud or error in every election. But in this election, no credible evidence of widespread fraud- defined as substantial enough to invalidate 3 state's outcomes - has turned up. Not even CLOSE You guys are grasping at straws, embracing unproven speculation, and morphing it into imaginary facts. Only conspiracy types with no understanding of the scientific method, or respect for serious evidence gathering, thinks like this. Trump created the idea almost out of whole cloth, and the rest of you have been brainwashed. A textbook case of brainwashing.
    1
  88. All been refuted. Living in a conspiracy dream world. Not a smidgeon of proof there's enough fraud to overturn 53,000 votes in PA, and the other 2 states needed to win. It's pure fantasy. You live in fantasy world, unable to exercise rational judgement. Do something productive with your life.
    1
  89. Just like Trump. If you say voter fraud enough times, no one will care to ask for the proof. The Trump brigade neither asks for nor provides proof of widespread voter fraud. It's a claim planted in their heads by Trump, who in turn pulled it literally from thin air. Note the key term WIDESPREAD.
    1
  90. You are grasping at straws.
    1
  91. It can be argued either way.
    1
  92.  @Sovereign-of-silly  Confused. Why did you just reply in another thread it was definitely a missile?
    1
  93. Based on what - the lack of proof? By your yardstick, the less evidence we have of something, the more true it is. Go for it.
    1
  94. Flight 93 is the ultimate refutation of 911 truth.
    1
  95.  @jimmymcjimmy9743  I will tell you why flight 93 refutes the more absurd characters in the truth movement. How would the world be different today without flight 93? The answer is, it would be exactly the same. Thus proving it was not a false flag. The alleged goal of the government was to attack buildings with people in them. But then the truth movement does an about face and declares its better to STOP F93 from killing more people. Another quaint example of the truth mvt's evident schizophrenia.
    1
  96. He has already proven his case. A clown, an idiot, a liar. Go for it.
    1
  97. They are saying no evidence of widespread fraud. Now I am going to challenge you on the above. Show me the proof - not the claim, but the proof, that the Dominion machines have caused 1) massive switches of votes and 2) that these alleged errors were not detected and corrected by the voting authorities. If you can do at least that much, then I will take you seriously enough to continue looking into this.
    1
  98.  @freeagent8604  I am not disputing the process should play out. I am disputing Trump's irresponsible claim the proof already exists of widespread fraud.
    1
  99.  @freeagent8604  Not if the claim is unverified. Anyone can claim anything. Is the claim that Elvis lives meaningful? Yes, let's allow the process to play out. But don't prematurely jump to the conclusion massive voter fraud is a proven fact, the way Trump irresponsibly claims.
    1
  100. Personally, I believe her. BUT, I think that when there appears to be two sides to the story, and the fact that not even children are immune from coaching (think McMartin pre-school daycare panic) we should not be so arrogant as to demand absolute obedience to anyone's claim. You are asking people to be omniscient. I am flattered by the thought. But a single accusation by one child, no matter how credible, and up against at least a plausible alternate narrative (see Cathy Young,) is not in principle knowable. Sensible and fair-minded folk, even those whose default position is to believe woman, have a right to leave some room for doubt. This is very different than Cosby/Weinstein/Epstein, etc, where we have multiple claims. I wish I were omniscient like you. But I can't claim that level of perfection.
    1
  101. Please cite the evidence. Not just the claims, but the accompanying proof.
    1
  102.  @lizardfirefighter110  In Georgia the hand recount confirmed the machine count. Today, Trump's requested recount of some Wisconsin counties ended up adding to Biden's total. You are grasping at straws.
    1
  103. If that's the only evidence of mass voter fraud, our election system is doing pretty good.
    1
  104.  @al44tec  Yes, but none of this constitutes mass voter fraud. Also, some of these claims have been refuted. Kindly Google "US election 2020: Five viral vote claims fact-checked" from BBC news, to get a more balanced view of these claims.
    1
  105.  @al44tec  I agree with you. Recounts are fine, but that doesn't justify Trump's irresponsible claim of widespread voting fraud. Big big difference.
    1
  106.  @al44tec  Also, see this recent CNN flashback article "Trump officials mocked Democrats in 2016 as 'sore losers' for not accepting election results;" Pure hypocrisy. People calling for a recount in 2016 were called "spoiled crybabies" by Giuliani. Brilliant article.
    1
  107.  @al44tec  "once again, CNN, a high biased and left based media" Irrelevant when they are recounting undisputed documented fact. Would you agree? Again, the desire for recounts is understandable. Claiming as an established fact there was widespread voter fraud is a lie, and yet another sign our commander in chief lacks basic mental stability and honesty. But you would never acknowledge this obvious lie, am I right? The man is dangerous in a way that far surpasses the danger of economic harm by a Biden administration, which BTW I also share. Biden family is no doubt corrupt. It's just that Trump is 10 times more corrupt, and now by suddenly putting loyalists in the Pentagon, and repeating fraudulent claims, he is behaving like a psychopath. Nothing Biden or Clinton or Obama have done can even come close to this teenage behavior. He is throwing a 14-year-old tantrum. A more balanced president might say, "I tentatively accept the results as long as we do an honest recount of PA and GA." That would give him a graciousness he has lacked since taking office.
    1
  108. Fine. Cite evidence that he's lying and maybe we can make some actual progress.
    1
  109. All caps, no proof. Go for it.
    1
  110. Well Trump certainly can't manage the task.
    1
  111. We are dealing with a case of mass brainwashing. It can't be undone by rational comments.
    1
  112. Because they are concerned about corona virus?
    1
  113. I don't see how. The reason is, these two defendants had no way of knowing what his criminal background was when they pulled the trigger. So how could that have affected their decision to shoot?
    1
  114. It's only obvious to people who don't understand the nature of evidence, and cannot connect the bigger dots. By saying these things, you fancy yourself smarter and more clever than the worldwide engineering community. You would have us believe the government would embrace false physics that any high schooler could refute in 2 seconds That is just about the dumbest theory I've ever herd. Along with the idea that after 3 unprecedented attacks, we needed to completely destroy 3 buildings to justify retaliation. What, the government would have just sat idly by, and done nothing? That's pure absurdism. The fact is, there is indeed a sound explanation of how the twin towers collapsed. See Ryan Mackey slaughter Tony Szamboti in a three part debate on Youtube. If you can refute Mackey, then let's hear it.
    1
  115. Please come to your senses. The age difference was 2 1/2 years. Are we just going to start criminalize teenage sex as a general rule? So if he was one day past his 16th birthday, and she one day before her, would you still cling to this principle?
    1
  116. If you don't have the proof, which you most certainly do not, then your words are meaningless.
    1
  117. Hard to know. In the HBO videotape, time stamped the very the next day, Mia sounds completely gentle and not putting words in Dylan's mouth. I don't think it's likely she got Dylan to cling to a story within just 24 hours. But who can know for sure.
    1
  118.  Oh Great One  This is how conspiratorial people think. I suspect. I have heard. But never "I have proof."
    1
  119. You are grasping at straws.
    1
  120. You're just spouting nonsensical speculation. If you can't find the proof, that means you are just another failed researcher.
    1
  121. No serious person is saying there's no fraud. They are saying that after more than a week since Trump made his fraudulent claim, no actual evidence has emerged of enough fraud to make a difference in the outcome. And if it ended up being a hoax, all the more reason to dismiss Trump's lie this time around. People are grasping at straws. What are the odds massive fraud will invalidate at least three statewide poll results?
    1