Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "" video.

If it makes you happy, OK.
2
Especially the least trustworthy elements. Like truth sites.
1
The truth is, you have no proof.
1
So why did they remotely fly a plane into the dirt in Shanksville rather than into a building? Does that make an iota of sense, even for a twoofer?
1
@CheerfulFerryBoat-ug8gr That makes you a pretty dark person.
1
@jimmymcjimmy9743 How do I sleep? If I'm having trouble, I start counting truthers and then laugh myself into a quiet slumber.
1
"I know someone" is worthless words. Why even bother posting.
1
Flight 93 refutes that.
1
@jimmymcjimmy9743 And flown by Elvis. Because you say so.
1
Flight 93 is the ultimate refutation of 911 truth.
1
@jimmymcjimmy9743 I will tell you why flight 93 refutes the more absurd characters in the truth movement. How would the world be different today without flight 93? The answer is, it would be exactly the same. Thus proving it was not a false flag. The alleged goal of the government was to attack buildings with people in them. But then the truth movement does an about face and declares its better to STOP F93 from killing more people. Another quaint example of the truth mvt's evident schizophrenia.
1
It's only obvious to people who don't understand the nature of evidence, and cannot connect the bigger dots. By saying these things, you fancy yourself smarter and more clever than the worldwide engineering community. You would have us believe the government would embrace false physics that any high schooler could refute in 2 seconds That is just about the dumbest theory I've ever herd. Along with the idea that after 3 unprecedented attacks, we needed to completely destroy 3 buildings to justify retaliation. What, the government would have just sat idly by, and done nothing? That's pure absurdism. The fact is, there is indeed a sound explanation of how the twin towers collapsed. See Ryan Mackey slaughter Tony Szamboti in a three part debate on Youtube. If you can refute Mackey, then let's hear it.
1