Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "" video.

Prove yourself right.
1
Not quite. Every person involved in international security knew that the summer of 2001 was teeming with hundreds of level red alerts. It was like picking a needle in a haystack. Broadly speaking, the clues about nine-eleven were readily apparent. But what's not clear is if the the exact date and tickets purchased by the H---ers were known, and if so, brought to the attention of the heads of the C--. Could some have known and downplayed it or wanted it to happen? Possibly. But that's a huge leap to the B-ush admin Ling itHOP.
1
That's a load of BS. The view you are taking is only shared by a relative few., and not shared by all the demo people who have commented on it. Even the Truthers; favorite demo expert, Danny Jowenko, agreed the twin towers were not brought don by ex-plosives. What do you know that he didn't?
1
@2handsandwiches I am 100% correct about Danny Jowenko. Do you want me to provide the proof?
1
@2handsandwiches You can;t even name the laws that were violated. If the laws of physics were actually broken, the worldwide community of engineers would have known from day one.That alone makes total BS of your claim. Like so many truthers in these parts, you believe you have been endowed with special truth seeking abilities and even the experts are all blithering idiots, minus that small sliver who have signed Richard Gage's position.
1
"Where did the plane go that supposed flew into the Pentagon?" As any safety expert could tell you, at that speed there would be essentially no recognizable plane left. But there are plenty of photos of wreckage inside the building. The infamous engine rotor picture was identified by an engine expert on the old forum where I uses to hang out. His name is/was Al Weaver and he wrote “It's the front stage of the high pressure turbine for an RB211 manufactured in Derby UK, but who cares, unless of course you don't believe that the plane actually crashed into the pentagon.” The book "Firefight" is a massive documentation of the event. If this is a cover-up, there is no precedent for this level of massive book length fake reports. So that's no different than saying AQ did it. No matter how you do the math, nineleven was a first, so there's no point in making one side look more fantastic than the other.
1
@dwingles5936 dwingles = no evidence provided. What else is new in cloud coo-coo truth land. The less evidence they can produce, the more enthusiatic they become.
1
There's much to be desired and much to criticize. But you can take that criticism and multiply it by a factor of 10, and that gives you the truth movement. A bunch of 2nd rate thinkers who have managed to con the intellectually challenged into believing sheer nonsense.
1
And the mass lies of the truth movement, which might as well be a branch of the master operation: a toy to distract people from their real crimes.
1
So you fancy yourself a combustion/explosives expert? Paper items surviving even fiery high speed impacts is neither new nor interesting. Remember, the passport blew out the side of the building within seconds, long before the building collapsed. Thus it is painfully obvious you cannot compare an item that escaped the collapse, with the ones that didn't. Didn't they teach you critical thinking in school?
1
@Theboxingobserver Orwell would have agreed had he read your post.
1
@2handsandwiches Show me the physics that says burning fuel always travels faster than paper. You can't do it, because it doesn't exist.
1
@2handsandwiches Oh no no, don't escape my question by changing the subject. Show me the physics that proves burning fuel or fire always travels faster than paper. If you can't, the discussion is over because it shows you are neither honest nor serious.
1