Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "" video.

There's one slight problem. You have no proof.
1
@blackscorpion-h8i OK, well let's do one thing at a time. Number one, you have bought the truth movement's Big Lie that phones don't work at that altitude. Tell me more about how you know this.
1
@blackscorpion-h8i There's quite bit of evidence cell phones worked from altitude on high speed jetliners in 2001. The largest study on the subject was conducted in 2003, and tracked 37 commercial flights up and down the East Cost, and found that cell calls were made at all phases of flight; more specifically about 40% of these flights confirmed cell phone connections from the cruise phase. Needless to, say you won't find a single reference to this study if you consume an exclusive diet of truth movement articles. Of course if the study had confirmed their bias, this would be front page news in The Truther Times. This shows who has been brainwashed and who hasn't. You also have Telecom experts who stated it's possible. Don't be shy. Try calling one yourself, as I did. You might learn some interesting things, such as that back then most cell phones were analog, which had a greater range. The claim it was common knowledge cell phones could not work in this context should have caused you to ask, why would the government embrace something everyone knows is impossible? Similarly, if airfones were useless, there would have been no market for them. It is plain your claims are not based on a thoroughgoing analysis. And that governments and airlines aren't as brazenly stu-id as you seem to imagine.
1
@blackscorpion-h8i Now it's your turn. Please cite evidence.
1
@blackscorpion-h8i of the alleged landing in West---over
1
@blackscorpion-h8i Your reply is poor sportsmanship. The reality is that you're frustrated and p-ssed that someone has rebutted some of your phone call claims. A person who is genuinely interested in learning would have shown curiosity about the study I mentioned. But you don't seem interested in the slightest. You're focus is insult and rigid belief rather than learning, and graciously accepting counter evidence. I would love to learn what evidence you have of a West-ford landing. And for that I'm a troll? I think you need to have a good look in the mirror and ask, am I being a good sport?
1
@blackscorpion-h8i "you're just another troll with nothing better to do" That's being a good sport? I keep forgetting this is Youtube. Where good sportsmanship = go away. You lack basic civility. This is the place to practice that. You are more concerned with your own feelings, and insulting people than the truth. The fact you can't even cite an iota of evidence for a West-over landing shows you have no credibility. That's another feature of Youtube. Go for it.
1
@blackscorpion-h8i You are giving me everything but the evidence. 🗝
1
@blackscorpion-h8i I am open to other explanations. But if you can't deliver evidence, I have nothing to go on. Or are you just saying, hey, here's a scenario that's more plausible than the official one?
1