Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "Family of Flight 93 flight attendant makes pilgrimage to crash site every year" video.

If this were true you would be able to walk into any university physics department and and get instant verification of your theory. I challenge you to prove your nonsense. Like most truthers, lifting a finger other than to click on CT sites is anathema. You don't do real research. If what you say were really true, the alleged US government conspirators would not have chosen to "violate basic physics." Because the whole world would have known within about 15 minutes. If you want to be a 9/11 skeptic, fine. But for goodness sakes can't you do it with more intelligence than the stupidity with which you accuse the government?
2
@derekgreene2304 "Aluminium aeroplanes don't disappear into 4 and 6 foot steel H beams surrounded with concrete" Only if you're up for the challenge, I challenge you to support that statement with good old fashioned physics.
2
@derekgreene2304 Anyone who thinks no planes hit the towers has a serious problem with reality. I challenge you to provide a proof the planes could not have sliced through the towers. Go to a physics professor and get back to me. If you don't, your words carry no weight.
2
@derekgreene2304 Yes. I was referring to your theory that an aluminum plane can't go through a building. Did you check that out with a physics expert yourself? We don't need Judy Wood because we already have a good understanding of what happened without bringing in high energy weapons, or whatever she thinks might have been used. The inability to trust the evidence of one's senses is one of the more remarkable phenomena of our time. I can give you page after page of witnesses who saw IN PERSON the 2nd plane impact. Were they seeing a hologram?
1
Ah I see Derek has deleted his replies. I think he began to finally use his brain.
1
@derekgreene2304 So why did you delete all your replies?
1
@derekgreene2304 Do you see any of your replies? If so, I apologize. It must be Google's customer vendetta algorithm once again.
1
@derekgreene2304 That woman, as I recall, has no data. It's just speculation.
1
If you really thought for yourself you would know that 9/11 truth has all the traditional markings of a scholarly joke: a complete absence of peer review, a poor sense of judgement, and refutations of all the major theories has been provided. But I assume you only read CT sites and not the debunker material.
1