Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "FRANCE 24 English" channel.

  1. It's an ongoing problem and has nothing to do with the opinions of skeptics. I'm not a truther, and no matter what subject I post, there's a 25% or greater chance my posts will not stick. It's Youtube's algrithms, There's a whole thread on this, they say that pasting text will flag you. And who knows whatever criteria. The most disgraceful part is not telling you your post won't stick until a refresh, sometimes not until hours later. Youtube is especially a disgrace when you consider it's owned by Google.
    2
  2. But most men are not rapists.
    2
  3.  @kowen5499  Spot on. There is something seriously wrong with mankind. This level of bad judgement is continuing proof of T. S. Eliot's (?) remark that "humankind cannot bear very much reality." The truth mvt and indeed most of the other easily refuted nut job CTs are as spectacular a confirmation one could have of his observations.
    2
  4. Part of this may be biology. Men are by far the more violent gender, and by far the more hypersexual gender. They just can't say no to it. Now add a little patriarchy to the mix and, voila!
    1
  5. The answer is, they wouldn't want to reek that level of destruction. If you were alive and remember that day, it seemed that by the 3rd plane impact, at the latest, we all had the sense of a common enemy, terrorism. Controlled demolition was therefore gratuitous in the extreme. No government, even a conspiratorial one, would do something so absurd.
    1
  6.    "As for the towers, well the destruction of the two towers was never explained by the NIST NCSTAR report" Hold on. They did give an explanation of why the twin towers collapsed. Whether one believes it is a different question.After I saw the Ryan Macky/Tony Szamboti debate on NH television(part 1), it became much more easy to grasp how the building might have collapsed w/o the aid of explosives. For me at least.
    1
  7.    I know the basics of their model, though the report is way too long for me to read in its entirety. What do you see as the main weaknesses?
    1
  8. Not a fact. The twin towers took longer than free fall. The resistance was responsible for the extra few seconds. If you or the truth mvt wish to prove your claim, the way to do it is publish a paper in a science journal. Like normal scientists do. To date not a SINGLE article in a science journal. NONE. This contrasts to not only the gigantic science paper known as the NISt report, but also several peer reviews articles confirming its main co0nclusions. Youtube is not the place to prove anything. Send your comments to a science journal. It's that simple. Otherwise you have zero credibility,
    1
  9. All these claims, so little evidence.
    1
  10. The real smoking gun is the very absence of cohesion in the official truther claims. Since when was it necessary to collapse 3 skyscrapers in order to invade Iraq? It's absurd on then face of it. Before any of them fell, every American already knew we were under attack and at war, and the retaliation would be huge. So controlled demolition would be self-evident absurdity. And then we have flight 93, an after thought even more self-evidently preposterous than the collapses,. . . . .and on down the list of preposterous theories, which often have an appeal to less rigorous minds.
    1
  11. I'd say it's a mixed bag. Progress doesn't always follow a straight line. A few years one way, then a shift backwards. But there's a case that the overall trend is positive. But I agree, what a bummer.
    1
  12. If there were an actual proof of pedophilia then maybe.
    1
  13. Give it up. There are now dozens of private videos showing he 2nd plane hit. There are videos showing the plane hit with audiences gasping. If you really think it's even possible the government choreographed all these videos and alleged actors, that puts you in a category way outside of normal psychology and basic matters of judgement.
    1
  14.  @abdirahmanidris290  If you want to be dismissed as a crackpot, I can't stop you. Please have the final word if you'd like.
    1
  15.  @abdirahmanidris290  Waste of time but if you insist. What is it that's driving you to re-write visual history? The first point should be obvious. Aside from ATC, no one had a clue where the first plane was. How could they?
    1
  16. It's in our hardwiring, though much more so in men.
    1
  17. True, but also always some woman somewhere that makes an excuses for him.
    1
  18. Some do and some don't.
    1