Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "VICE TV" channel.

  1. The truth is you're wrong.
    3
  2. Never before has there been controlled demolition of a skyscraper. Therefore it couldn't have happened.
    3
  3. This is what happens when you are brainwashed by 9/11 truth, Inc. You can see parts of the plane on the lawn in close up photos. Inside, there were pics of engine compressors, and landing gear. The book "Firefight" is a detailed account by recovery workers, all giving their names, attesting to aircraft parts. They are all liars, right? You won't know any of this if you only read truther sites.
    3
  4. For which there is little real evidence.
    2
  5. Many other airline pilots said it could indeed be done. I know. I asked them myself when I was a limo driver at logan for many years. So don't pretend there's anything like consensus it was impossible. Most witnesses say they saw an AA jetliner. How did the government manage to convince them they saw a was a missile? Answer: they didn't. Read the book Firefight, which documents dozens of first responders giving their own names. cheers bro
    2
  6. No one cares what silly people think.
    2
  7. Even if they saw it with their own eyes, those with twoofer vision will still insist they saw a hologram.
    2
  8.  @emperorzurg7258  Yes, he must have forgot to put that part in.
    2
  9. Yes. About as funny as the Youtube video of a ping pong ball slicing neatly through a ping pong paddle. Or the Youtube video of water cutting through aluminum. More to the point, the steel didn't have to be cut. Would you like to ask this question to a physics professor? And do you think the government chooses false physics because they know the worldwide scientific community would unravel the alleged plot in two seconds flat? Does anyone at 9/11 truth, Inc. ever ask such questions? Do they ever do anything but copy and paste from each other?
    2
  10. Governments always try to profit from convenient circumstances. That includes events they did not cause.
    2
  11. Anyone can make a claim on Youtube. Proves nothing.
    2
  12. That is so true. The truth movement, almost by definition, is not the truth.
    2
  13. Yeah, mfitz is 100% right, and most truthers also know this. So what possesses you to make a fool of both yourself and the truth mvt? Fine by me of course. As I've always maintained, government shills are as pointless as collapsing skycrapers. You guys do a great job all by yourselves destroying your own credibility.
    2
  14. We know pretty well what happened. Most people figured it out on day one.
    2
  15. Mike is right, it was found before the collapse. Even so, paper items surviving even fiery plane crashes is nothing new.
    2
  16. Yes, that about sums up the truth movement.
    2
  17. No proof, sorry you lose.
    2
  18. The evidence of a 757 hitting the Pentagon is massive and beyond doubt. You're the one that's been brainwashed. By carefully protecting yourself from critical feedback by reading only truther sites. When you isolate yourself from all the other sources, you lose touch with reality. I recommend the book Firefight, which is massive documentation of the 1st responders accounts of the plane crash at the Pentagon. Don't come back with the government hired hundreds of fake responders and firefighters. No one will believe you. cheers
    2
  19. It wasn't. Kindly do better research.
    1
  20. Inside your imagination.
    1
  21. Only if you confine yourself to truther sites and block out all other sources.
    1
  22.  @mehere8-32  Sorry I'm not fluent in internet code.
    1
  23.  @Robert_D_Mercer  Yes, the truth matters to me.
    1
  24. Multiple choice quiz: Why was it necessary to blow up some grass in the middle of nowhere? 1) Because without some heroes, the War on Terror would have been impossible. 2) Because without dead grass the War on Terror would have been impossible. 3) Because without 40 additional dead people the War on Terror would have been impossible. 4) Because the idea is monumentally stupid.
    1
  25. I can refute that in 2 seconds. Do you think that after 4 planes evaded air security, crashing into 3 buildings and killing hundreds, and seeing the sight of the twin towers, and the people jumping.....that the government would have sat idly by and done nothing? Seriously.
    1
  26. Let the men handle air crash investigations. The truther boys are still struggling with the alphabet.
    1
  27. @@politelyvulgarvernacular You're also desperately seeking attention. That's OK. We all do it sometimes.
    1
  28. @@politelyvulgarvernacular I just love people with 2nd rate senses of humor. They remind me of 2nd rate intellects.....i.e. truthers. An opportunity for me to shine. "Hate messages" Sometimes the truth hurts.
    1
  29. Not sure why you think you qualify as a comedian. You have no talent in that department.
    1
  30.  @Robert_D_Mercer  Well at least I did something right. :)
    1
  31.  @Robert_D_Mercer  Well, ask commercial pilots yourself. They should be more qualified to speak than you or me.
    1
  32. @@adamkennedy6284 Yes I know. I'm a paid shill too because, as we all know, the government desperately needs to pay us to do what truthers already do so well on their own: look as stupid as possible.😵‍💫
    1
  33.  @LuckyPoop  The only problem is, you have no proof.
    1
  34.  @LuckyPoop  I believe remote control tech exists, and may well be on today's gen jets. but no real proof it can't be overridden by pilots. What makes you so certain? What would be the point? Name a scenario where it has a high chance of ever being used on a commercial flight. Sure didn't work on 9/11.
    1
  35. Amen to you, but this forum is about 911, not the place for religious sermons. Thank you for your understanding.
    1
  36. @@politelyvulgarvernacular Trying desperately to assert your superiority. No one is falling for it except you.
    1
  37. That just about sums up the truth movement. Not even the government can mach it, not only for its dishonesty, but for its passion for distortion, reckless scholarship and shockingly poor judgement.
    1
  38. @@politelyvulgarvernacular Not that it bothers me, but your attempts to be funny aren't even funny. Let pro comics like me do the heavy lifting.
    1
  39. @@politelyvulgarvernacular And now ma friend, ah have things to do. So have a delahtful evening.
    1
  40. Do you honestly think the government had anything to gain by crashing a plane into an empty field? Do you ever ask yourself these basic questions? Did the "War on Terror" depend on targeting grass? Seriously.
    1
  41. The Truth movement peddles theirs, so why not?
    1
  42.  @nadimnaouach5839  Sorry to say, paper items surviving violent plane crashes is nothing new or unusual.
    1
  43.  @lilymiller3522  I hate to break it to you, but paper and cloth items surviving even violent plane crashes is neither new nor surprising. It is a common place.
    1
  44. That's the lie propagated by people who lack rigorous minds, who don't understand the nature of evidence, have shockingly poor research skills, and have little common sense. The truth mvt has all of the classic traits of Grand CTs: they don't publish in science journals. They are not experts, they can't do basic research (the lie that "cell phones can't work above 8k ft". They are more interested in collecting signatures (witness A&E for Truth) and cannot acknowledge their huge errors (witness pilotsfortruth refuted F77 fdr analysis.) In short, telemarketing and tabloid journalism. If you can't tell the difference, then you aren't a real truth teller.
    1
  45. I did climate change.
    1
  46.  @624Eduardo  Based on what?
    1
  47. The people who do twoofism have tiny brains.
    1
  48. Not as dumb as you think they are.
    1
  49.  @h1F595  Welcome to 911 truth, one of the most shocking collection of lies, fraud, crackpot scholarship and mentally disordered judgement in the business.
    1
  50. Absolutely, especially 911 truth sites. They are down the with the dregs, like the National Enquirer.
    1