Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "VICE TV" channel.

If they let a terrorist attack happen, then by definition it was a terrorist attack. Did I miss something?
1
@Larry26-f1w Not literally.
1
@sinekonata LOL, you think I'm that naive? Of course he's a 9/11 skeptic. The vaporization is an unscientific reference to controlled demolition, as if a collapsing building would not emit a huge quantity of dust. The towers were 90% or more air by volume. The amount of the building turning to dust is impossible to estimate because we cannot SEE through it (this glaringly obvious failure is alone shocking for any alleged serious researcher.) The debris pile was several stories high above ground level. Thus any reference to "vaporization" of the whole building is absurd and totally lacking in the spirit of genuine scientific inquiry. What else is new with the truth movement, with its improbable or even bizarre theorizing. The need to demolish buildings to begin with is one example. Saying we needed some heroes to cheer us up is not far from mentally disordered. The failure to acknowledge that building 7 was fully engulfed, or that claiming cell phones from planes were impossible, or the creation of a blatantly fake peer review site, are other hallmarks of their grossly inadequate research skills, and shockingly poor judgement. This approach to reality is what one expects from the National Enquirer, not a serious truth seeking endeavor. No wonder they are largely confined to YoutTube.
1