Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "Explosive 9/11 Claims | National Geographic" video.

@jasonhickerson2235 "911 can be understood using physics that any 9th grader can learn if the child chooses to sign up for the classes." There we have it once again. The idea that the worldwide engineering community doesn't understand 9th grade physics is part of the same 4th grade fantasy script. You and fellow skeptics like to think you are endowed with the special gift of "9th grade physics." Translated into reality terms, the worldwide scientific community are for the most part blithering idiots who haven't studied physics beyond 9th grade. Do you not see how remarks like these are astoundingly stupid? Surely you cannot be that dense. Keep on changing your name and posting this absurd fantasy of idiot scientists. You do a better job than any shill at destroying the remaining remnants of the truth movement. This is not worth continuing, but if you want to keep proposing manifest absurdities, more power to you. I welcome the self-induced destruction of idiot ideas. I couldn't do a better job myself.
2
@jasonhickerson2235 The rage you are expressing is , I surmise, because it must be embarrassing to have never thought just how monumentally stupid is the theory that the government would hang its plot on the violation of 9th grade level physics. Seriously, you never thought of this fatal flaw until I came along and mentioned it? Another sign you don't employ critical thinking. I am sorry if you feel insulted. Maybe you are a totally sensible person. But we all have our pet blind spots. This is THE mother blind spot of the entire truth movement. They cannot see the obvious here.
2
@jasonhickerson2235 Oh it's way too late for that.. Richard Gage Steven Jones and David Ray Griffin have already cornered the market.
2
Exactly how do you envision nanothermite demolishing the towers, as no truther ever explains how. It's not an explosive, so do you envision nanothermite used to trigger explosives? Tell us your proposed mechanism.
2
Has it ever occurred to you that if the government's claim of a gravity driven collapse is in fact the junk science truthers say, any idiot could unravel the plot in 2 seconds, and the engineering community would have unanimously declared it controlled demolition from day one. Since that did not happen, the theory is garbage on that basis alone. Unless you think the US government is nuts.
1
@jasonhickerson2235 Only a 4th grader would seriously entertain the concept that a government would commit 100% impossible physics to fool the world. That's a crackpot theory. Plain and simple.
1
@jasonhickerson2235 "100% impossible physics? " So you agree that gravity driven collapses of all three towers did not violate physics? Beautiful.
1
@jasonhickerson2235 You say very little in proportion to the amount you post. I am not calling it a character "defect," just a comment on the failure of some to grasp reality at all levels. I am not saying necessarily you personally. You can insult me all day long. It doesn't change the fact that governments wishing to fool the world don't stay up all night saying, "Gee let's invent impossible collapses." or "Gee, let's invent impossible cell phone calls." Do you seriously theorize along such lines? Really?? You should ask yourself why you embrace it - if you do, that is. Now you get all defensive and spew out a bunch of worthless claims, and play grammar police -- a tried and true indication of the level of seriousness of said poster-- because I dare to call a crackpot theory by its real name. If this does not register as nuts on your end, I can't help you. Notice you say all these things about me without an iota of proof. This is in keeping with the truth movement, who in general are in love with ideas in proportion to how little evidence are in their support.
1
@jasonhickerson2235 If you want to see a true professional who knows his physics cold debate a somewhat clueless engineer, I recommend you watch Ryan Mackey and Tony Szamboti in their 3-part debate here on Youtube. There is no doubt who is master of the physics.
1
@tpryce6342 Thanks for filling me in.
1
@jasonhickerson2235 "Now, once again. Do you or do you not wish to debate me concerning the physics of 911? Yes or no?" No thanks. This is where any person good at rhetorical skills can pick any tiny technical detail and turn it into a litmus test for 911 physics. I'm not falling for that. If you have a proof, send it to a science journal. Something the truth mvt absolutely refuses to do. Maybe you will be the first.
1
The truth movement has never ONCE had any of their articles published in a peer review journal, or respected science journal. Not ONCE. The reason is mainly because they absolutely refuse to.
1
@UC2MekSS3AS4LFzl-sGrNvJQ I am through, so don't expect any more replies from me. But I think you will enjoy the debate even if you disagree with Mackey.
1
@richardalvarado9807 Direct me to one of their peer reviewed papers.
1
@tpryce6342 Do you think we've scared Big Jason away? All his posts have vanished. What a fraud. edit: his posts are back - must be another Youtube flaw. My apologies to you if still here.
1
@richardalvarado9807 That's exactly why it IS a good example. Adults thinking like 4th graders. Bingo.
1
@richardalvarado9807 You are taking my analogy too literally. I am saying, IMPO only, that a lot of truthers exhibit 4th-grade level JUDGEMENT. And further, it may well be some 10-year-olds do read about and research 9/11.When I was 10, I knew everything about commercial planes. I knew the flight numbers of the planes that flew over my house, I could identify any plane and airline type thanks to a fascination with OAG flight guides. I also studied geography, knew every state capital and country capital. So even if taken literally, you're still wrong. Not all 10-year-olds areincapable of basic research skills, the way many truthers seem to be.
1
@c.augustedupin2559 Yes that's right. I am God. I thought I already explained that to you.
1
@jason8952 No thanks. I don't have a degree in structural engineering. Do you?
1
@jason8952 Did you read what I wrote directly below that in the same post?
1
@supersnapp On the subject of insulting one's intelligence I would vote for the bizarre idea that the government would hang its alleged plot on junk physics "that any 9th grade physics student could refute." Or decide to embrace impossible cell phone technology for an utterly useless crash in the middle of nowhere. Or that somehow the War on T and A and I depended on a bunch of heroes The government may be evil, but it's not completely insane or suicidal.
1
@c.augustedupin2559 It's some sort of blend of metals that when sufficiently heated can become an incendiary, but not explosive per say. That's been my understanding.
1
@c.augustedupin2559 Why are you asking me?
1
@c.augustedupin2559 "oh I thought you were an expert" Did I say I was?
1
@c.augustedupin2559 Go for it. Show me my know it all comments. You are exhibiting poor internet manners to exaggerate my knowledge of some aspects of thermite claims into an expert. It shows you are a bad sport, plain and simple. If you wanted to be serious and courteous, you would have left out the snide comments, and answered my question directly. I have no idea if thermite is used to cut steel. Do you have an example of it cutting steel?
1
@c.augustedupin2559 Me truther? That's news to me. Like I said you have bad manners and poor sportsmanship. Me ranting? You're one of those people who love to invent enemies out of whole cloth. You still haven't answered my question. Maybe you don't know the answer yourself? Go for it Big Guy. Keep on your insult streak. That's your forte. Keep pretending I was ranting.
1
@c.augustedupin2559 You are exactly what MoonEyes states. Trolling for trouble. Loving to provoke people. Your goal is to humiliate rather than to converse. How sad that is.
1
@jasonhickerson2235 I already gave you the link in two forms. The link itself, and the key words to put into Google. Go back and look!!
1
@jasonhickerson2235 Just wondering what kind of person wastes their time insulting anonymous people on Youtube. Get a life.
1
@jasonhickerson2235 Well, the whole insultfest began when you said I needed to get my money back. I have stopped engaging in the insults. You and Duped are drawn to it like kids fighting in a sandbox. Maybe you should both start an insult club where you can call people liars day in and out. I hope you enjoy the debate, and please don't pretend I didn't give you the key words to bring it up.
1