Comments by "cchris874" (@cchris874) on "9/11 Impact Anatomy | National Geographic" video.

@mooneyes2k478 "Oh, I "imagined" that, not hard since it happened. Now what?" Where did the psychotic side of the truth mvt get these utterly hysterical views from. Did 431 ever call up a physics professor after dreaming this stuff up? Did he forget about the weak points, the weld joints, holding the steel beams together? That's all that has to fail. You'd think these people must have studied something of the subject before making themselves. the laughing stock of the web. As I said above, the notion of paid shills is economic nonsense. The government has essentially free shills in the form of Dwingles & Co. Each time these people post, sensible people are driven away by the droves. Perhaps they are the paid shills?
2
@c.augustedupin1926 To the contrary, the burden of proof rests with the skeptic: what evidence is there the aluminum planes did not crash into the towers?
1
Dwingles420 Let's see here. Anyone who disagrees is a shill. No wonder the truth mvt collapsed. The lack of evidence stands as the hallmark of Youtube skeptics. Just as they thrive on a lack of anything remotely resembling serious evidence, so too does the Youtube truther thrive on the complete and total lack of evidence that any given stranger on Youtube is a shill. In each case, the lack of evidence is the name of the game.
1
Dwingles420 Hey there nice truther. For the same reason people have a passion for debunking weird ideas. What planet do you live on? Have you heard of Skeptic magazine? It's a natural human urge to debunk off base, bizarre or junk ideas. Is that really a mystery to you? It's as common as rain. It says to me you are so obsessed with the idea of paid shills you can't even register the obvious.
1
Dwingles420 Yeah, that's easy. It's called hubris. It proves to the viewer you have no interest in a serious discussion. You guys don't need any paid shills. You do a fine job on your own wrecking the truth mvt. People come on and see this stuff, and as you say, they see it for what it really is. Nuts. That's why the dying remnants of the truth mvt are relegated to playpen forums like Youtube. Only a few serious people bother to take you on.
1
So if you are really serious, I like to use this as a test question. Truthers typically say the cell phone calls were impossible. But that's an unscientific and erroneous conclusion. So we can test who really has the evidence on their side by who is employing the scientific approach to evidence. Are you up for the challenge? Here's a golden opportunity to show what truth finding is really all about.
1
Dwingles420 I don't doubt you. But it shows a lack of scientific rigor. Sources: IEEE spectrum study showing cell calls connected at every stage of flight; telecom experts, one of whom I spoke with, who pointed out that back in 2001 most cell phones were analog, and these had a greater range and were more likely to connect back then. Your own limited personal experience is an example of anecdotal evidence, the least reliable form of evidence. You can't just cite one source and ignore all the others. There are also plenty of anecdotes well before 2001 of passengers receiving phone calls from the ground. So as I predicted, said truther/skeptic fails to employ the full scope of available sources, which is one of the main problems of 911 skeptics. They pick and choose only the sources - in this case yourself - that pleases them, and seem unaware or uninterested in all the others.
1
@user-ic6kv7dj4x "PRETTY sure" You're ahead of the curve. At least you acknowledge doubt, which cannot be said of so many others.
1
@shillhunter2.047 No, science works by considering all the evidence, not just your personal experience. Like I said, paid shills are unnecessary. Each new post confirms that 9/11 truth cannot be taken seriously. You're doing this ALL BY YOURSELF.
1
@MrYourfriendbutters "You do realize that "science" is a method. " Why wouldn't I? Before going further, what's your take on the exchange I had about cell phones on 9/11?
1
@mooneyes2k478 Don't think he can block me on this video. Notice how I lay out my evidence in a reasonable way, with reference to telecom experts and the largest study ever done on cell phone use in flight. And he disappears. That's 9/11 truth for you.
1