Comments by "May L" (@MeiinUK) on "China property giant Evergrande files for US bankruptcy protection - BBC News" video.

  1. You know when people say that there is "only one china"... They aren't very inclusive and nice nice.. cos inside is an old Imperial system... that they want to work with... as well as keeping an actual financial system like the USA's... and this is why it fell flat on its face. Cos you cannot have both this way. What they should've done is kept those regions which had always been about import/export just as that.. and not to let any other internal deals... to be using this kind of model at all. It is weird... for "other countries to give china money, chinese developers money"... Cos then.. it makes the USA acting like a "tributary state of the PRC".... lol.... Why ? In the past... the relationship was built on... "remittances from chinese dispora going back home".... That is why people inside the PRC could get money. So when they either died, or went back home. Who would remit ? Nobody ! lol.... (And in actual fact, some people tried... and then, they are very rudely marginalised. Oversea's chinese that bought chinese sh!ts.... often get criticised a LOT. I wonder if they ever ever knew that at all ?) Talk about being ungrateful. A stupid phone.. costing 300 pounds, could end up as around 500k RMB.... RMB and yuan are not even the same currencies !!!! This is their own internal issues, cos frankly.. if foreigners see the "single country" as a place with "two currencies"... Then they would begin to get why things are not working. And the disputes are also precisely that too.... It's a sad life.. to buy their goods... remit... raise their families.. and their next generation... only to be called "racists" online... or to be called..."don't be petty".... (That is even worst, cos I have never met them in my life !).... Who are these people ?....
    2
  2. 2
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6.  @RainFS1  : First of all.. it is untrue that, people cannot own land inside China. They can. They can, especially if they were the descendents of the imperial civil servants of the past. They can own those lands, and they can live on those lands. When "developers" buy a piece of land and then to develop on, then this is different. The thing with the PRC is that, there were areas whereby it isn't as such.. so "communism" means to reconcile all regions to be communal.. or the same focus. But how is this possible? Some areas have people living on there that they have paid off in the past generations, and worked to pay them off already. Whereas some people have extra children.. or grandchildren.. and want an actual house for them.. So what do they do? They sell their extra lands, in order to swap a percentage for the developers to develop on. In the past... people work... and then their salaries basically buy the building materials ! Nothing was free. It's a straight swap. Swapping money or swapping food for resources. How did you think people's wooden houses actually get created? And why some people lived in shanty towns ? Craftsman are the people who learnt a trade to build houses or monuments... But what about the areas that didn't have such craftsman ??.... Do you see how the revolution, "out with the olden style".. and "in with the new styles" kind of caused a future.. chaos ???... Look at some of the older videos.. and you will see old housing... and begin to see why, or what. It's just.. always a case of.. "too much too soon, too fast."
    1