Comments by "May L" (@MeiinUK) on "China says UK has 'poisoned' Sino-British relationship over Hong Kong and Huawei" video.

@kimtan1278 : You are too young to understand the situation, and its associated boundaries. UK is not interfering in China's "domestic affairs". "UK IS ACTUALLY COMMENTING NOW, ON AN INTERNATIONAL ISSUE, WHICH CHINA HAS WITH THE UK." The Sino-Joint declaration is a LIVE CONTRACT. It is activated post 1997+50 years. Who, and how, and what, and why, would China, say this is "domestic affairs" ??? Some aspect, DOES impact the declaration. You do not know which part does, and which part does not, do you ???? You are a funny and weird person. Sovereignty has signed over, but it does not mean, the entire system is transferred over. You have ZERO clue. Many contracts and business contracts, that existed, before 1997... can now be undone actually, between China and the UK. So why does China wants this Huawei contract any more ? UK does NOT have to give into this contract, cos it is not even trading as a fair system. It has NO obligation to trade... You DO know this, right ? No trade negotiation, and no contract, MEANS no TRADE. You DO know that, right ???? How can China trade, when Shenzen is built up as a secondary financial city ? The financial city in HK, was built up by the British. Is China saying that HK's financial city status is going to collapse ? If it is... Then it means that, it no longer CAN be a financial centre, AT ALL !! It would move over the border INTO the Shenzen area. And then, there might NOT be actual financial centre in HK at all... And trade outside of the mainland is going to be controlled. So, I do not understand why all of these small time businesses... or chinese business owners, still see other countries as "open". They cannot be a part of their market.
3
If HK did implement Article 23, when UNDER British rule... BEFORE 1997 came... Then it means that HK would have protected its "two systems" bubble.. But because it did not activated it THEN. It can no longer activated it NOW. Cos now, the Sino-Joint Declaration has kicked in.. and it activated AFTER 1997. You can thank the arrogant and ironic Legco members.. who went along the ride, but did not put in the stopping risks. When you see the movements of the companies being edgy, you KNOW that was a turning point. Many companies were allowed slowly to develop between 1997, to 2020. Under the remit of "non-disturbances", and everything will be okay. Well... the social media generation now brings ALL parties IN the SAME platform. It is NOW that everything is shown... and all arguments put forward. Even the ones who did not realise, or did not want to accept as real. It is real alright.
2
@thinkingaloud5379 : Yes, but UK also brexited as well. So under EU... maybe EU laws, but now on our own terms, UK needs to stand up to its OWN obligations as well, as part of NATO. It is not doing it just for ourselves, but also with the various memberships which the UK is a part of. Funny how people do not think that UK would do that either..... FYI. China is ALSO a part of the UN Security Councils too... So why does it not self discipline ???
1
"China kept on bonking for the past 70 years... and throwing sweeties out for everybody..." And now regulation and stricter "returns" is now starting to be seen everywhere.
1
I have been reading the old wiki articles.. about HK. It used to be part of the Imperial Canton's Province. It was only a fishing village. It has now, been, it was indeed by imperial law.. for the people to go and defend the invasion of anti-Qing ? Only then, for the Qing government, to then enabled, MORE Hakka, or non-Canton provincial people to move into that area... When they were not of the same race. THIS, was the start of the wars.... and continued for years and years AND years.... When I read the English articles... It really was NOT... translated properly. And when the war broke out between these two groups of people. The locals, were attacked and harassed by the newly migrated people... This was never officially stated, was it not ?
1
@anchored555 : Chinese government did not lift 800 million out of poverty. Chinese government, never used to charge any lands.. maybe only imperial lands. And that was internal, and not external. It is when the "country" decided to join the WTO, without knowing its full obligations.. and yet, would NOT reform, to meet its expectations. So much so that, chaos happened. Again. Only in the mainland, can a "party member" has enough gold, stored in his home, more than the value of a small European country. THIS is not governance.. THIS is stealing !!! It is called "People's Republic of China"...."PEOPLE'S".... But that money belongs to the people. Not to this individual CCP party member. Some people forget the reasons why they exist.. and their "job" obligation.. 800 million was lifted out of so called poverty, is a bit of a fake number. Cos those lands were used to be charged and added into the mix. So many times, the stock exchanges within China collapsed. Again and again, and again. People own many "state-owned enterprises"... As in, location provincial governments, borrow money, in order to report their GDP figures. A lot of things are very wrong in the mainland...
1
I thought that there was a semi-central bank in HK as well.. or acting as.. but it isn't even so... There is no official central bank either of the country... All of this, is VERY odd !!!!
1
@anchored555 : But the World Bank, and the WTO and ALL the other international diplomats, EXPECTED political REFORM TO GO WITH THE STRUCTURE !!!! BUT IT DID NOT REFORM ! It is even MORE sh!ttier than before !!!!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_Ree4Dtg2g&list=PLK7qCnafFFJZ4LZMM4Q0SBFVT8CqkWhtL&index=23&t=3250s An ex-world bank employee, talking about what China NEEDS to do !!! Funny that ! As if, the mainland can keep on doing things the way they have always done things... Oh right, let's all do bitcoins. Isn't this now clamped down inside the mainland ? Cos it managed to squeezed out of the country ???? You mean, we do not know what goes on behind closed doors ???
1
If you think about it, it makes no sense to activate a "security law", when the actual country's sovereignty has been transferred. So what IS happening inside of the mainland ? Did that law never existed before ? Are there operational issues across ALL regions and areas ? Did some of them, are actually NOT internationally legal, and compliant ? Possibly, yes, right ??? Cos when you read the chinese comments. A lot of them makes NO sense !! People still use languages, similar to that of Imperial China.... "Sifu".... "Imperial Area".... etc etc. People "say" things, but they "do" in another way !!! Do not tell me that some people inside of China, do not realise that, signing an international agreement, means that you WILL meet the international GOALS as well ??!!?! Did you think that only chinese companies would benefit ? And not to make it 50/50 ?? Did you think that "china can open up", but other countries can SINK ?? What ?? Did they think that, money should just be turned inwards, and not spend outwards ????
1
Singapore also has bought a lot of properties as well in the UK... and same with some listed Shenzen companies too. But that would go. It will end. It has to end.
1