Comments by "May L" (@MeiinUK) on "The B1M"
channel.
-
@joshi1863 : With HK, it's different because, the British government didn't own the rest of the land, and even then, there were boundary issues. So they were forced to build in a tiny spot, and that is why they seems to be so much closer together than it ought to be? The saving grace is that, is it in a hot climate, so... you would always have AC and nice weather outside. But the thing to be aware of, is the draft, extremely strong ones, as you walk past some of the buildings near the HK Island side as well. I think the buildings built in the 1990s, were done well.. and genuinely were great engineering. (I take it, those days were kind of pre-computer era as well. Or maybe they did have some, but not without recalculations and human calibration adjustments.) Cos the subsequent ones that were built, were badly made, and they dotted across the entire city. Those ones were the ones whereby the windows were blown out during a typical typhoon, but the HK Island side ones have strong windows. You can tell those earlier materials were so strong, and that quality was a thing too. Nothing was scrimped. The subsequent typhoons have blown and shattered so many windows in HK after that. Toilets had water sprouting upwards as well, and things like that. Really terrible.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@greaterbayareahero1401 : But Japan rail is a private national project. Not an international project, with different companies as suppliers to the project.. and those companies, bear the weight and currency fluctuations as well of their own home country. So yeh... this is no mean feat !!!! (NB: Judging the comments here.. it seems like... the "design" (which is the original calculation was wrong, or misjudged... cos most companies would indeed just actually do what is required etc)... and in this instance... James Poon did not "whistle blow"... Whistle blow is a situation whereby you knew that it would break a situation, and then it is a bad situation, and it was intentionally done. So.. in this situation.. did they deviated from the original design? Presume not. So if they did not, then basically, his assumption is that... in an "undefined situation" and "untested".... He desired more to be spent, and more to be added to be above a tolerance level, rather than actually to follow the original design. i.e. He is trying to force more money to be spent.. than not... Everything has a cost. So, would it come from his company ? Cos taxpayors are paying for this. Not his own personal account.
There are starving and poor adults in HK. And this project is what... just another few millions.. for what purpose ? To save the trip for an extra 15 minutes ????.... THIS.. as we say in Cantonese.. is "spoiling the child".
1
-
1