Comments by "May L" (@MeiinUK) on "Moody’s Reveals China’s Fake Economy: $11 Trillion in Local Debts, Fatal Crisis Due Next Year" video.

You are talking about a 1.4 billion people market... so.. you cannot compare a 1.4 billion, to that of an actual ...6 million people of Switzerland... So even if it is in the lower level, this is and should be seen as "normal"... to be frank.
1
They are only doing that, only because, they see their respective region as an actual bank or individual plot like that. But.. many of the financial institutions aren't connected like that together though. I thought that before they merged all of their banks, into national ones... they were like that... they had actual regional banks which were good and well runned. Without these kind of national level policies, that generalise and basically collapses... and merge regions etc... Cos I don't get it.
1
@hunggiang1475 : So each state is like a state bank then... ??... So how does it inflate then ???...
1
You shouldn't judge China with Moody's... and Moody's is an actual relatively NEW index.. as in.. it is not there when it was the 1900s.... and some of the banks inside China, has been there since even the creation of Moody's... So... I feel that, China has been somewhat misled.. and forced, or indirectly pushed a bit too fast, too soon... via the global leaders. And it IS an actual 1.4 billion country. So why should other 60 million people actually forces a 1.4 billion... to make decisions that might not actually.... is condusive towards them ?.... Unfair judgements.
1
I don't think that is the issue.. it is because china also wants to and needs to actually also use the net or their mobile for advertising too. Along with actual laws. It is similar to the UK as well.. whereby Libel is an actual thing. And if you want to market something, then you pay the marketing company, before it reaches the internet company and before it is broadcasted. Where china is concerned is that, they are of a much larger scale? So their solution seems to be very restrictive... that is why this kind of "blanket ban" is kind of very intrusive... For foreigners, it is confusing, cos you do not know how to read a situation. Cos we have been raised very differently. Whereas many citizens are raised with mobile-based lives as well.. asap... while we were raised with 2G, 3G.. 4G... and not everybody has 5Gs... whereas some are raised with 5Gs.... A lot of citizens, do not know how to interact with foreigners.. cos they have 1) never seen a foreigner in their lives before, or 2) never been out of their own hometown before, or 3) never been to a city before. So... maybe some give way is appropiate ??? Not too much, and too fast... cos they don't get who they are talking to ? Or why.
1
Rather than to follow their own created different grouping system. I think they tried to generalised and flatlined ALL regions.. and even those so called "red lines".. I think they did not take a good judgment call or something to that effect, and must have been applied to all or something to that effect. Which is weird... and when everybody runs, then all runs... something like that. I don't know.
1