Comments by "May L" (@MeiinUK) on "China Has A Debt Problem Three Times Larger Than Evergrande | Economics Explained" video.

SO... I don't get this. So they "borrowed" money... Then, why not give those items, TO their shareholders then ? And then do a reverse back up.. as in, remove the railways that they don't need, and therefore creating more jobs ? If jobs are supposed to be circular.. then why not continually switch over, here and there ? And besides, everything has a timeline... and maintenance could be done slowly.. It is like saying... "i want to build everything"... but they don't "maintain it"... Well.. now they realised that they need maintenance, right ? Planning before building... and China just did not want to go into a recession. Well.. this is the ultimate situation.
1