Comments by "Elizabeth Loveland" (@Shineon83) on "CNBC Television" channel.

  1. “Gratuitous nastiness?!”….How abut, “Honesty?”
    16
  2. I work as a software designer in a very large, diverse company. An AA coworker (male) recently expressed his support for Trump—so we took an informal poll….All of the White females we asked said they were voting for either Biden or RFK; of 4 AA females, 3 were for Biden, 1 for West…. Here was the surprise: Of 11 AA males, NINE were either “def” or “likely” to vote for Trump—the other 2 were voting for “The Couch” (the 23 White males were mainly divided between RFK & Biden—only 1 said he’d vote for Trump)…. I should add that this is a young cohort—mainly under 35….I’m now really curious about how young AA males will vote (I’ve since asked 4 other AA males I know from the gym—and got the same general breakdown: 3 Trump, 1 The Couch)….I’m now wondering if this is a thing—and if the Dems have any idea….?
    14
  3. ….”Most likely” they won’t, Little Pink
    7
  4. So….what are you saying? “CNBC should not be reporting this”….So you think that NOT reporting news is a good idea? You might want to rethink what you’re calling for. Sounds a lot like Authoritarianism.
    5
  5. **CHINA BOT**
    4
  6. No, you don’t “see” them—but you better believe they’re slipping huge donations Trump’s way—💯%
    3
  7. “What gives me confidence?….¥2.1 mil/year (off-the-books, of course)….Believe these CHARLATANS & traitors at your peril
    3
  8. Now, NAME & SHAME ALL THOSE DEMS WHO TOOK FTX CAMPAIGN DONATIONS
    3
  9. Every Western country—and their allies—should recognize Taiwan as an independent country on the SAME day…. Seriously. WHAT would China do? “Cut off” trade with all of their partners? PAST time to call China’s bully-boy bluffs
    3
  10. LUNTZ needs to take a vacation ….nonsensical double talk
    2
  11. “That wouldn’t be good for TESLA?!?”……What about TAIWAN & the TAIWANESE??? Damn, Elon—clear OUT!!
    2
  12. 💯 % one-of-a-kind, gifted writer ❤
    2
  13. Tony B. is a “nice, soft guy” — in a job that requires a very tough (often, very “un”-nice) person
    2
  14. This dude is a very long-time China shill….His wife is the daughter of a top-ranking Chinese Politburo member ( which opened a lot of Chinese doors to him)….He’s lived in China for over 15 yrs, and until September, hadn’t been back to the U.S in over ten years ….The fact that he’s left his Beijing firm to hit the U.S. financial talk show circuit pretty hard, tells me that he’s not here on a whim — he was sent
    2
  15. This brunette chick is über-annoying
    2
  16. You don’t just, “frequently visit” China. You LIVE there. The fact that Pooh has you dudes now playing “comment tag” to juice your economy really shows the desperation ….(Btw, the fact that the host doesn’t mention that his “guest’s” wife is the daughter of a member of the CCP Politburo’s Standing Committee is unbelievably unethical….
    1
  17. She has insights, alright—unbendable insights
    1
  18. No, bot—move on to another site
    1
  19. *CHINA BOT*
    1
  20. CCP is known to have many “influential” brokers on the payroll—to keep Western investment coming….
    1
  21. Yes, bot.
    1
  22. WHY the microscopic treatment of Israel—Where’s the focus on what’s happening in Myanmar right now?
    1
  23. Shame, CNBC — not revealing that your guest’s wife is the daughter of a member of the CCP Politburo’s Standing Committee ??? ( No conflict of interest there)
    1
  24. Agree with everything he says EXCEPT on China : Jamie has WAY too many interests there to be anywhere NEAR honest or impartial.
    1
  25. ….This dude is a long-time CCP shill….His WIFE is the daughter of a CCP Politburo member ( doesn’t get much higher than that )…. He just returned to the U.S. from China — first trip home in over TEN years (which tells me he didn’t just have a sudden “hankering “ for “home”—-he was SENT.
    1
  26.  @howardlee357  ….You mean a “tsunami” of EVs with exploding engines (will BYD begin making “Driver Side Fire Extinguishers “ part of standard equipment)? As for “Why” there are so many “naysayers” in the West whenever China reports good economic news/introduces new tech, that’s because : 1. China Lies. A lot. ……2. The “tech” China introduces has usually been stolen (from us) …..3) China has a very long business history of wanting “fast results” & profits—without putting in the R & D ( so whatever is made that hasn’t been stolen tends to be garbage quality………4) Did I mention how much the Chinese lie??
    1