Comments by "JustAThought!" (@JustAThought155) on "ABC News"
channel.
-
80
-
16
-
13
-
8
-
7
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
Wow, a pastor who does not care that this woman he sees is into porn, yep, porn star who is now his private commodity, ah, at least he does not have to repent for being 'into' porn, literally. Glad Jesus saved her, but I think of Mary, in the Bible, who was captivated at the feet of her savior, so much so that marriage was not her road to redemption....Jesus was.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I watched the segment and her show being cancelled, because of her sharing her opinion, seems outlandish to me. I am a dark skin American who was not offended. I cannot speak for all people, but, in my opinion, this so called "controversy" spreads racism. If they cancelled the show because she made negative comments about Kent University, or the school in England that she condemned due to their policies on costumes, then I would understand the offense, somewhat. However, this cancellation due to her mentioning not understanding why a lady was considered offensive towards others because she darkened her skin tone for a one day costume event is certainly not grounds for being terminated. Thus, the cancellation generates and creates a negative bias towards those they claim are offended, or the people of color. In turn, they have now turned her simple comment into a topic that fuels anger. In other words, this is an ongoing tactic, by the media that dominates this society, to stir negative attitudes towards people groups. Why did they not cancel the show due to her speaking out about Kent University or college? Why did they not cancel the show due to the Nazi comment? Therefore I ask, why did they cancel the show due to her asking why someone offended others because she darkened her skin to look like Diana Ross?
So, here is my take on this matter: I call your bluff media execs, sorry, you are the racist who seek to stir controversy in order to acquire more money and viewership. Therefore, stop attacking the Black race!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Diversity embraced and encouraged by a homogeneous group is a self-satisfying altruistic way of warding off internal, individually and collectively, homogeneously defined racism. Defining racism from an external perspective, of privilege and power, is as the old CSN&Y tune proclaims, “To sing the blues, you’ve gotta pay the dues.” They do not have a clue, and most accurately, or a desire to embrace change! Notice how the Harvard president preached the “inclusive diversity” message, and then swiftly resigned before it was implemented. And no, folks who were in place during this and the other mentioned incidents are not committed to change even if they are elevated to high positions. How do we examine this as truth: they were not asked or presented an ultimatum to leave. Get it???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1