Youtube comments of JustAThought! (@JustAThought155).
-
2600
-
996
-
526
-
333
-
271
-
169
-
154
-
96
-
95
-
94
-
93
-
91
-
90
-
Our nation's Chief leader is "normalizing racial" (CNN) slurs. This is horrible and sickening to hear and digesting. Sadly, we are being governed and represented by such a being, who fails to realize that he lives in a world that is dismissing, or actively trying to dismiss, the dividing lines that separates cultures, globally!
In addition to this, let me address another theme I heard in this clip: ABC is saying something like now you've gone to far. To better address this theory, here is what must be said: this rude behavior is not an "enough is enough" issue nor a "you can't get away with this anymore" stance. Instead, how about if we adapt this stance: STOP IT! We do not accept your bias rude attitude so if you don't like the multi-racial republic we are, here in America, get (the ....) out!!! You want a one race nation, fine, see ya! You ain't gonna find it here! But suggest to the xenophobic(s), I am sure the great white north, as in remote Canada, Russia, or Finland, has enough room for you and your fellow one-race comrades! Therefore, good bye and good riddance!!! ✌️🤛 and EXIT: 👉
87
-
85
-
83
-
80
-
78
-
77
-
77
-
74
-
72
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
51
-
Sooooo, this man was released from an all male prison, for good behavior, as a criminal who beats ladies???? Ahh, just for the record Canadian authorities, he was probably a very good prisoner....there were no females in the prison. Note to all females: When everyone, friends, family, and strangers tell you the guy is bad.....the guy is bad!!! When everyone tells you he hurt his last wife and girl friend and the guy's excuse: He was/is the victim, ahh,take notice.... the guy is bad! Second guessing yourself might be one of the worse ways to ward off unnecessary stress and abuse; go with your gut! Wait, OPP once again, Didn't I see this police force in the Russell Williams episode? Aren't they the same force that failed to inform people about the violations happening in their region, the eighty plus incidents committed by Col. Russell Williams??? Ladies, beware of thatOPP police force....this aspect of the community is obviously does not qualify as members of society that they will "protect and serve!"
50
-
47
-
Well, there you go, the 4:13-4:32 minute marker is eye opening, sadly, in my opinion.
The older billionaire revealed much in one short response to the question: can young people afford this property, in this dated 2017 report. He replied, “No,” and added “as long as the Chinese…continue to buy.” In other words, he is living in Australia, building homes in Australia, and earning Australian money. However, as long as non-Australians continue to purchase his produced housing, he is content. How about that version of nationalism???😢
44
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
Well, I watched this thinking it was solely honoring Princess Anne. But watching the new King, Charles III, I have one thought. As his mum and daddy would have said, “Just get on with it.” So, may they be respected as they too walk out of an era and into a new norm; they are orphans, literally. And their entire immediate family members, those they grew up with, are now all gone. Regarding Princess Anne, my heart felt her grief as she bowed to honor her mother, as seen in a clip captured in Scotland. She remains steadfast, as instilled in her, unto the very end of her mother’s reign. 🌹
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
@Divadellecurve , Well. Possibly. Thanks for the reply. Let me share my thoughts concerning your statement.
Quick reality check: he can’t control that which he does not have.
In my case, he would have never controlled me because he would have never received more than possibly a cigarette, to make it clear.
My statement involves my approach: if a man is asking, or begging, me for a cigarette that act alone serves as one contributing factor towards dismissing him as a potential life partner.
If that man is riding a bus in the middle of the day, typically known as working hours, AND bumming a cigarette from me, that equates TWO contributing factors dismissing him as a potential life companion.
And honestly, I would have never learned about his other mishaps, or factors: i.e., no job, state welfare, children, etc…because I would have ignored his request for a cigarette—during working hours—and mentally dismissed him as a possible bum or vagabond.
Sorry for the somewhat critical assessment.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Look at the Queen Mother at the 4:20 mark! Geez, they are out on a stroll through a PARK and the classy QM is graced in fur, heels, and hat! Man!!! We just don’t have it anymore! God! I’m glad I lived to see leadership with such a class, pose, and professional standard. And note, the QM and QEII lived their lives without TOUCHING adultery; instead, they display and displayed such a loyalty to their husbands and nations; that serves as a standard this viewer seeks to emulate. Mind you, THAT fact alone, in my opinion, qualifies as a form of leadership this world DESPERATELY needs to see, continuously.
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
So, I learned the UK's justice for the criminals who committed this "systematic" murder equates thirty years, which means the two will realistically be sentenced to serving ONLY fifteen years! The girl is dead. Fifteen years for torture AND murder??? Was this justice extended to the family? Will their grief stop after fifteen years? Will Sophie return to life? No, no, and no. So why should the two criminals be allowed to reestablish their lives after fifteen years of living inside a warmed and cooled prison, whilst eating meals each day, making new friends, talking with loved ones on the phone, reading books, never paying taxes, and dreaming up new dreams to fulfill when they return to society outside of the prison walls; is this truly justice for murderers? Please re-examine such laws especially for the sake of that innocent hard working girl! She withstood such ill treatment while remaining faithful to the children who so adored her. Horrible!
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
I pity his family members for their loss, but I am so not a fan of the man because I believe he had much more to live for. As the Boston guy said, "If everyone knew the consequences...they would not be excited." That is why I think he wasted his life simply by trying to impress others while destroying himself. I watched his father on another show explaining his dislike towards the NHL for the drugs that were administered to his son. I would contest that, I was angry towards his family for encouraging him to continue on in hockey, every since he was seen as a teams fighter, as a kid! Why would they cheer him on when they saw it was destroying him? Why cheer for something that uses your loved one as a means for making someone else wealthy? And that is what the NHL did and does, as well as many other sporting industries, to those who sign on the dotted line. For a FRACTION of the cash they will receive, the players salary compared to the leagues financial gain, the player's sacrifice is far more substantial, and this story proves this fact, because this time it cost this man his life.
7
-
The host seems clueless. He is so focused on planned lines that he seems to dismiss the very people he is introducing. The second guy from the viewers left, in the front, is seated next to two men in wheelchairs, and the host says, "he hopes to get back on the ice when his finger heals." Wow! Umm, how do you think the two men seated next to him, in wheelchairs, feel as they must hear those words? Even the young man being bragged about might suffer some "survivors guilt" as he sits next to his one time teammates that skated next to him, on the ice, just a few months ago, but are now confined to a wheelchair. They have a future, don't get me wrong. However, I think the host is a bit insensitive during this honoring ceremony.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I just discovered this interview. Concerning “celebrity,” or being considered a “star,” and addiction, I believe the true pressure that is never talked about is the fact that the person is put on a pedestal, in society, when in fact they are a slave to the industry.
Basically, you ARE controlled by the industry. And many try to escape this reality by using something to help them deal with reality: eg., money (bragging), “living large,” and drugs or alcohol. Sadly, drug and drink are the easiest remedy that is readily available to fill the reality.
As he said, in the “9 to 5” world, when YOU are sick or when you need a personal day, YOU are in enough control to say, “I cannot work today.” The lie associated with the celebrity status is when millions are telling a person, “You are a star!” When in fact, reality says to the person, “But ‘the man’ owns me. Others tell me when to work, how to dress, when to speak, and what to say or not say.” Executives have the power and they always remind the “star” of this fact: who made you???
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Look at the neighbors, 🤔; there may possibly be more than one offender in this case.😉! Hey, when you borrow $538,000 from your father and you are in debt to your “line of credit” to the tune of $163,939 (above your credit spending debt) that does not show someone who is “managing” their finances; don’t forget, the man earned a degree in business and economics and managed money for a living, neighbor. Dennis was in a horrible financial state. Regarding the interrogation methods, I think the tough investigator, Copeland, ruined it!😳! The guy was talking and talking, even when alone in the room, and much was being exposed. But when he became silent, officer Copeland, become silent along with him, cop! Silence tends to work wonders.
4
-
4
-
I wish this poor beautiful little girl hd been introduced to a REAL man instead of the self-seeking thug criminal she is now trying to defend. As articulate and well-groomed as she is, was she not groomed in wisdom by her family? Having her gift of loyalty set on a repeat criminal offender is indeed a true waste. Would some mature and wise women please meet, counsel, teach, and install in this girl what and who to seek when seeking a lifetime partner. Please. Family members, why would you not install in this family member values that would give her an internal instinct to flee from persons, male or female, that do not strive to become PILLARS in their community, not the late night partying thugs that brandish guns around your child, who happens to be awake after midnight around a pothead father and his drug running friends. Also, let her know that she should seek a man enjoys his space, but not one dwells in his "man cave" that she must defined as a place that she would have to "choose your battles" about when asked if she knew if his BEST FRIEND was with him in that portion of their house. Shayanna, you need to value yourself, not live in fear, and call on the Lord to bless you with people who will make you the best person you can be, for you AND your daughter. Those persons are out there, but you only find them when you value and find yourself,...first.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
This show should have given credit where credit is due. Matt Haney’s DNA collection, in the 80s, solved the case and caused Ridgway’s 84 in total killing spree to end! His goal: 100. But here’s what sickens me, many of the victims (NOT ALL) had parents that protested Ridgway’s crimes but had households that victimized their children to such an extent, their children preferred prostitution rather than spending another night in their parents home.
And worse yet, Seattle had children, girls, as young as 11 years old climbing on cars prostituting themselves. The city FED the serial killers, in my opinion!
When all those multiple killers were roaming that city’s streets, why weren’t interventions taken immediately to get those kids off the streets, especially since the Green River killer was “dumping” up to five victims per MONTH!
4
-
So, I learned the UK's justice for the criminals who committed this "systematic" murder equates thirty years, which means the two will realistically be sentenced to serving ONLY fifteen years! The girl is dead. Fifteen years for torture AND murder??? What is justice for the family? Will their grief stop after fifteen years? Will Sophie return to life? No, no, and no. So why should the two criminals be allowed to reestablish their lives after fifteen years of living inside a warmed and cooled prison, whilst eating meals each day, making new friends, talking with loved ones on the phone, reading books, never paying taxes, and dreaming up new dreams to fulfill when they return to society outside of the prison walls; is this truly justice for murderers? Please re-examine such laws especially for the sake of that innocent hard working girl, who withstood such ill treatment while remaining faithful to the children, who so adored her. Horrible!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Keep fighting this fight true sport stars!!!
To the NFL: I stopped paying money to allow medical burdens to be released on the fragile United States economy. The tax-free corporation called the NFL, has released more injured Americans into our society, as they earn millions of dollars, yet fail to help carry the financial burden their corporation/business creates on our nation.
If you do not understand the above point, let me explain it in plain language: I do not watch any football games. I do not pay to watch, via television - as in pay for cable to see a game, any game college or professional. I do not condone any team where the boss (CEO) of the entire league refuses to accept medical evidence proving their 'workers' are becoming physically destroyed because of their participation in the required activities of the industry.
NFL, if your corporation took an approach showing sympathy, freely seeking ways, from the start of this issue, based on the first test results, concluded in the Pittsburg studies conducted by Dr.Omalu, as well as, the findings of Dr. McKee, I would accept the act as a concerned industry. Since you have not chosen to do so, I have concluded you are a company, wealthy enough to not need anymore donated funds from my wallet; yes, this is sarcasm used when writing the word donation, but it is also a true fact. The word donation is used only to express the reality that I choose to donate my time and money to support something outside of the realm of it being a necessity. Therefore, your company will no longer receive contributions from this hard working American!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Oh my gosh! This comment is long. Sorry.
Ugh!!! I lived through this mess in real time! I remember the Bronco chase and how our shows were pre-emptied. Really, when that happened, viewers that watched ABC’s 20/20 witnessed the ABC anchorman, Peter Jennings, verbally STIFLE the Queen of televised news herself, Barbara Walter’s, like, LIVE on the air. Wow! That act alone sent shockwaves across the airwaves. So, after all of that drama, I have been hesitant to watch ANYTHING about this case for many many years.
Before I vent, let me first say, I am a person of color. However, I was NOT in favor of the accused man at all.
Here’s why:
The man surrounded himself with a limited number of persons of color. He had surgery to thin his ethnically plump lips. He divorced his wife, first or second, who was (is) the mother of his children and she was (is) a woman of color. Why did he divorce himself from her? Oh, so that he was free to enter into relations with caucasian women…only. Find old footage. Hey, I watched the man play football in real time and NOT on highlight reels. And once he jumped for the Hertz commercials, the man jumped right out of the dark skinned people’s social pool, in my opinion. Really.
Yet, for some unbeknownst to me reason, during his trial, he was suddenly elevated as THE Black man of the century! And honestly, once that become the central focus of the trial, I never watched the trial…EVER…despite it being ‘streamed’ EVERYWHERE, like, EVERY…WHERE; remember, this was longggggg before the live-stream era! So, as I rant, again I say, I never agreed with the defense’s strategy. Hey, here’s what the defense team did, do you remember the slogan from the Russell Crow Gladiator movie: win the people. Yup! That is exactly what the defense team did!
Hey, the team put racial conflict on trial and NOT the murders, in my opinion. So, basically, the defense team simply stirred the emotions in an emotional hot-bed city, especially when discussing White officer’s racial bias towards Black people, let alone Black Men! If I am not mistaken, didn’t the trial occur after 1992…in LA…??? Need I say anymore about racial tension between White officers and Black men…Rodney King??? Right.
But most of all, and above all of the listed issues, I could not stand how Los Angeles turned the brutal deaths of two people into a money-making theatrical cesspool!!! Absolutely HORRIBLE!
After venting those concealed thoughts, I will probably not watch this mess. There are better things to focus on than that same old horrible racial narrative. Let’s move on.❤
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
Can anyone say MONSANTO???? Hey, don't trust coffee either!!!! I can't say I believe this 'so-called' Dr but I do know our food is so governed by greed that health takes a backseat!!! Dorks, wheat is addictive because it, when the body breaks it down via glycolysis, it is reduced to sugar, hence, the sugar affects the body in various ways. Many of these people on this 'gluten-free' diet is a fad! Fad's are just that a fad. I eat wheat and I will not stop eating wheat but I will say too much starch will affect your body.When people follow a person, they show me how insecure they are; still looking for the correct people to sit next to in a elementary lunchroom. As soon as the Gwenneth portion hit, I knew it was time to turn it off. When Gwenneth Paltrow says, "I lost weight on this diet," the heavyweight that 'she' is, I knew...this is a waste of time! You got me Fifth Estate but...you did not keep me with this one!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@vg7735 ….😶. Okay. So happens, maybe thankfully, I have not experienced such mentioned culture’s debilitating influence in Australia, parts of Apartheid South Africa, Canada, Caribbean, North America, nor New Zealand.
Yet, I have lived through the European domination that dictates what constitutes acceptable “norms” when referring to clothing, hairstyles, food choices, beauty (or lack there of), income, entertainment, and an overall standard for living.
In my world, based on my experience, again, thankfully, no Asian nor Middle Easterners have subjected native populations to reserved areas with structural racism binding EVERY aspect of their lives. However, such is not the case in other places in the world when such mentioned cultures have damaged entire societies.
With such an understanding, I would suggest the culprit that must then be addressed are those possibly wealthy people groups who operate as if their wealth equates success: this is not truth. This is especially not truth when success hinges on and depends upon one culture belittling our fellow human beings. Again, it is time to rethink the standard defining what qualifies as a civilized society. Sadly, the majority of indigenous peoples are somehow defined as “marginalized” by the marginal groups dominating wealth rather than human inclusion.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
As American baseball’s lasting rule states: three strikes and you are OUT! In this murderer’s case, in my opinion, he is no longer eligible to live amongst the free society!
Sorry, this is longer than expected. I had to vent.
Honestly, I think Australia needs to reconsider many of their judicially defined prison sentences. But again, regarding this case, here is the bottom line: the man freely murdered ladies, multiple times. And in my mind, he is and should be considered a THREAT to society.
Mind you, his version of processing his life and dealing with the issues he faces in life is based on subjecting harm and control over others. And every attempt is to benefit his needs and desires, which is evident in his multiple attempts to gain his freedom: letters, self-proclaimed rehabilitation, sex-change (times 2); all of which are characteristics based on a manipulative personality.
Above all, innocent people should not be punished with the burden of existing in life whilst living in fear because this man is eligible for a released sentence because of some antiquated legislation choice that was decided by factors associated with funding and prison space.
Be safe! The victimization of the innocent is often overlooked in the halls of judicial institutions, really. I mean, honestly, hasn’t history shown us the perils of repeat offenders? So when does it stop? Oh, I know, when another few victims are murdered. Then we’ll see 60 Minutes Australia, a decade from now discussing how a one time serial killer was released from prison only to kill again.
Enough is ENOUGH, in my opinion.😢
2
-
2
-
I am no expert like many on this thread. I did however wonder how Prince Philip’s family was able to escape Greece during their turbulent years of conflict. Your comment stirred this thought. After seeking the Internet, I discovered this excerpt on the BBC’s website regarding George V’s role in providing safety for Prince Andrew of Greece, Prince Philip’s father, and his family.
The article states:
The family's subsequent flight across the Adriatic Sea to Italy aboard a British warship, with the infant Philip sleeping in a converted orange crate, was helped by King George V of the UK, Andrew's first cousin. The monarch's determination to rescue them owed much to his regret at having failed to save another first cousin, Tsar Nicholas II, during the Russian Revolution five years earlier (BBC News; Prince Philip: A turbulent childhood stalked by exile, mental illness and death. 10 April 2021).
Therefore, it seems George V had regrets based on his choice to not extend help to his cousin. To bad the mindset within the circles of elitism is to talk to their own. Meaning, I wonder if Nicholas should or could have sought Denmark or other nations for a safe exile?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Tom Carhart demanded the site should not be built. He discussed the negatives associated with the color black, and how “black” represents horrific stuff. Obviously, Mr. Carhart failed to realize or recognize all the White leaders, in the White House, who freely demanded more and more young men go to Vietnam to fight and die to protect their, the political leader’s professional careers and reputations. So no, Mr. Carhart, the color black does NOT represent negativity. If you don’t believe my words, look at the history books and photos to see all the leaders who ignited so much destruction and death that caused the need for a memorial site to honor the 58,000 plus murdered people, not to mention the 3 million plus Vietnamese citizens whose lives ended as a result of European involvement in that Asian state’s issues.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No intentional condemnation contained in these shared thoughts. I am seriously bothered by this episode.
These are facts shared in this show. Don’t comment to contest my stance based on these facts.
Many things in this episode are causing me serious concern:
- husband is “17 years her (his new wife’s) senior;”
- new wife is out “Warehouse” clubbing, which is a den of potential deadly threats, without him???😑.
- the newly married husband is where??? Oh, at home sleeping???😮
- successful young ladies drop “coke” from…whom???
- they head out of the Warehouse club with men…as in…plural??? But did they arrive with men??? 😦
- this tragedy happened in “2021???” I’m like 60 years old and I know the reputation of the dangers associated with Warehouse clubs: secluded areas, date rape is almost a norm, even talking with strange men is like opening the door to severe negative consequences. 💔!
Why ladies? Why???
I write this because having a fun ladies night out DOES NOT have to involve going to secluded Warehouse clubs, dropping cocaine, SPEAKING to strange men, and leaving ANY PLACE with men, plural, as in multiple men. Really.
The families are now devastated! And honestly, I believe these deaths could have been preventable. Really.
Horrible, horrible, horrible situation.
Please, DO NOT let their horrific fate happen in vain.
Ladies, girls, college students, function with CAUTION! Be alert! THINK THOROUGH ACTIONS BEFORE DOING THE ACTIONS.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Alessastarz , Yes, sadly, many people (even very successful people AND many police officers, especially those who are highly esteemed) fit into the psychopathic diagnosis scale. They are trend setters and visionaries with skills that can convince nearly ALL people their product or actions are the BEST! Hint, think Elizabeth Holmes. But if you talk with them, you will discover they could not care LESS about you, instead they will demand your full attention and basically command you, through manipulation and even emotional based lures, to abandon yourself to cater to their needs; why? Because THEY need you. Reality: they are dictating to you what they really want YOU to do!
Anyway, sorry for any misunderstandings due to my wording, which I have tried to correct. I am running errands and answering or responding to your intriguing comments this busy day.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This just truly sickens me. People, STOP using the ocean as a garbage can!!! What people group has caused the most industrial waste in history? Do "Third World," "Uncivilized" people groups do this? No. Time for our wealthy, thriving, and (so-called) "civilized," leaders in industry, nations to start looking in the mirror! A prime example of this occurred in the USA years ago: The Dust Bowl. Native indigenous people lived on the land for centuries: did they ruin the land and water in that area of America? No. Who did?
Civilized is not defined by industry; instead, civil is defined as "courteous and polite" (Google). A "civilized" people are folks presumably elevated to an advanced society, but the true definition of the word civilization, consistent with the root word: civil, is defined as "polite and well-mannered" (Google). And what industrialized "First World" nation fits such a description? Hence, who is truly destroying our world and should be considered the most destructive people to strike our entire planet? Don't respond to me and this simple opinionated post; instead, look at the facts and then start making changes!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I had a male cat that looked like him. Back in 2017, I had to move out of state and some “friends” in Ohio said they would take my cat and his sister into their home; however, they never did. So, my one time well groomed, vet handled, healthy well feed cat, King Arthur abs his sister Fluff, were abandoned. I will declare this publicly, I will NEVER speak to those people again. So, four years later, I think of my cats EVERY SINGLE DAY!!! I am glad you took care of this lost guy, and I hope someone did the same for my little guy!😥😥😥
2
-
As powerful as this documentary is, YouTube has placed 12 (2 ads per) commercial interruptions during the first 38 minutes.
What message are you sending, Google/YouTube??? Seriously, at $69.00 dollars per month for a subscription, do you really need to interrupt a historical informative and emotionally engaging video, such as this, to sell furniture, “dry balls” soap, get-rich-quick gimmicks, and how to “poop” to lose weight advertisements??? Absolutely ridiculous!
And to those who will comment on this post by telling me to check my ad settings, I have done that. However, YouTube will continue to infiltrate and manipulate each viewer until they earn nearly $100.00 per month from every person who utilizes a platform designed for us to share information; remember it was created and titled “YouTube” for a reason: Your Television station.😢😢😢
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, this solider sounds and is very heroic. His patriotism is set in foundation of US loyalty. He is commendable. Thank you, Sir.
However, watching him and hearing his words, with the undercurrent of his emotions that are clearly evident, makes me hesitant to applaud him as I recognize the fuel of trauma, which continues to be chiseled away in me, as it runs through this warrior’s emotional opinions.
Yes, save the drowning man, but please first make sure you are strong enough to carry you and your brother not only by the strength of a hyper vigilance form of adrenaline, instead carry and save yourself and your comrade by a healthy determination to survive on and off the battlefield. 💜
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Here's my question: what border???? Sarcasm used for emphasis!
Here's an added interesting fact. It seems our illegal immigration issue seems to focus the most on our southwest border.
However, according to a Pew Research report, "Mexicans may no longer be the majority of U.S. unauthorized immigrants. They made up half of all unauthorized immigrants in 2016, according to the Center’s preliminary estimate, marking the first time in at least a decade that they did not account for a clear majority of this population. Their numbers (and share of the total) have been declining in recent years: There were 5.6 million Mexican unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. in 2015 and 2016, down from 6.4 million in 2009. Meanwhile, the number of unauthorized immigrants from nations other than Mexico has grown since 2009, from 5 million that year to 5.4 million in 2015. Non-Mexicans numbered 5.7 million in the preliminary 2016 estimate, a total that was not statistically different from 2015. From 2009 to 2015, the number of unauthorized immigrants from Asia and Central America rose. Increases in the number from other countries have mostly offset the decline in the number from Mexico (and a relatively small decrease in the number from South America)" (Pew Research 10.3.16).
Based on a 2016 article by a Newsweek affiliate, Latin Times report, this reality has been an issue commonly overlooked when discussing the illegal immigrant:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now estimates 93,000 Canadian overstays, more than double the amount of Mexican overstays (42,000) and about the same as the combined total of South America America (Cedar Attanasi: 2018 Newsweek Media Group).
So why such a disparity? Probably because "Canadians have a higher median income, are less likely to live in poverty, and are more likely to have health insurance and to be college educated. They are significantly older, on average, than the overall immigrant and U.S.-born populations" as Elijah Alperin and Jeanne Batalova reported in a 2018 article for the Migration Policy Institute (6.7.2018). Yet, according to the same article, "In 2017, Canadians living abroad, whether in the United States or other country, sent approximately US $1.3 billion in remittances...[a sum of money sent, especially by mail, in payment for goods or services or as a gift (Google)]
to Canada via formal channels, according to World Bank data" (Migration Policy Institute 6.7.2018).
So, let's check our policies based on the treatment ALL illegal immigrants must be subjected to so that we can truly justify the treatment addressed in this post. Thus, here's my question: is this treatment practiced on our northern boarders, as well, to PROTECT our society?
P. S. Here's the reality, who has been hiring and reaping a fat tax-free/reduced income benefits based on employing these so-called illegals??? Who is the TRUE illegal in this reality???
2
-
I learned of this case from the CBS show “48 Hours.” I am baffled by this guy’s deceptive behavior. Therefore, I wonder if he was taught from an early age that success was obtained by your position in society?
According to the “48 Hours” episode, Chandler was at one point, a very successful swimmer, possibly, for years. Also, a letter written by his mother was read by one of his mother’s relatives, on the show. The letter shares many of the successful positions and accomplishments her two sons had achieved, but there was no mention of the mom sharing how pleased she was to simply spend time with her two sons who have grown into great men. Of course only a portion of the letter was read. However, based on the limited information available through that one episode, and the personal accounts shared: e.g., the letter; it seemed easy to assess how the sons could have had an expectation of socially acceptable success being instilled in them throughout their lives.
In reality, every deceptive item on Chandler’s verbal resume was associated with being highly successful, socially. And each of the deceptive positions he shared about hinged on the items that made it into the mother’s letter to her family members. This is telling, in my opinion.
Thus, it is easy to see how non-verbal signs and actions lead to outward behaviors, as your assessment suggests. And in this case, it seems as if Chandler sought to achieve family worthy success, but knew he failed at doing so, and basically decided to destroy the source of the pressure rather than trying to live with the fact that he did not have to or that he could not measure up to the expected social standards set by his family’s expectations.
This is not an excuse nor sympathy or empathy for this killer. Chandler is a criminal. He could also easily have mental issues that fail to provide him the tools of facing life on life’s terms. But was this natural or was this nurtured?
Relying again upon the CBS “48 Hours” episode, Chandler was successful in his parent’s mindset. Yet, another telling fact was shown about expectations in that family. The sons were both in a relationship with their girlfriends. However, Chandler’s union as built on falsehood, hiding, him returning home to live with his parents as he agreed to eventually be “traced” via Snapchat by his seemingly long term girlfriend.
However, if you hear the read letter from his mother, notice how that aspect of the story did not appear in the news sent to the family, for the mom simply wrote in the letter with an image of her sons standing next to their girlfriends, how successful the boys were and how “the boys and their woman” stood perfectly smiling for the picture. The mother could have easily shared how her sons are growing up rather than the schooling and workplaces are even topped off with her sons having “their women” as well.
Overall, it seems as if hints of deception were common in the family as an attempt to keep up the appearance of one happily united successful team. And honestly, we are seeing how not everyone can live like this, hence the upswing of the many other family annihilators are making the headlines, sadly.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Honestly, I think they should have put Rader down just like the fate of his murderous heroic predecessor, Glatman: DEATH!
And whatever we do when these murderers are caught, could we PLEASE STOP INTERVIEWING AND ANALYZING these killers so that they can no longer exhibit MORE control as educators and esteemed teachers worthy of attention.
The best thing Rader experienced was his ‘audience,’ or the victimized survivors, walking out on him before he could open his mouth and exercise his control, again, over them by judicially—in a government controlled environment—forcing them to listen to him with undivided attention. HORRIBLE!!! By doing this, he is provided judicial permission to imprison them once again, in my opinion, and that is a very sobering reality!
2
-
2
-
2
-
Wait. Aborigines, Indigenous, and Native peoples, globally, have been declaring the destructive plight of the new lords of the land for YEARS!!! The so called uncivilized savages, who were driven off of the one time beautiful landscapes found on earth, globally, NEVER unleashed such destruction on or in nature! However, now, some young girl: i.e. beautiful natural looking model of European decent, starts proclaiming the same cry of the Aborigines, Indigenous, and Native peoples, and all of a sudden, BAMMM, the world takes notice. Sick. But please do not list your ill responses; my comment is based on my opinion, solely, and DEEP concern regarding the constant, global, onslaught of destruction the “civilized” continues to inflict upon the earth. Sickening and Sad.
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wow, a pastor who does not care that this woman he sees is into porn, yep, porn star who is now his private commodity, ah, at least he does not have to repent for being 'into' porn, literally. Glad Jesus saved her, but I think of Mary, in the Bible, who was captivated at the feet of her savior, so much so that marriage was not her road to redemption....Jesus was.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I am at a loss. Gospel "star"??? What is that??? We see people weeping before the Lord in the video clip, but this man is sitting there saying "we dropped the single and it's doing good." Therefore, can I ask: Who "Deserves It" then????
Did you say people are "screaming your name" because you are allowed to usher people to sing unto the Lord??? So, why have you not rebuked them, for your "new single" declares the Lord as the One "who deserves all the glory."
You know, this is why I try to NOT listen to these people talk! As much as I love singing this song, unto the Lord, I am taken aback by this interview due to the vessel who proclaims himself as the "star" associated with singing worship TO the AUTHOR of the good news, or "gospel." Sorry, but the "star" of the gospel is the Lord God Almighty, His Holy Beloved Redeeming Son Jesus, and His powerful, yet tender and humble, Holy Spirit.
Oh Lord, you have declared that you will share your glory with none. Therefore, please dethrone those who desire and strive to receive the praise due to You, King of Kings. Just like You removed the "fallen star," described in Isaiah 14, so long ago. God please call a remnant, from the masses of these churches, who will worship You in "spirit and truth," while alone with You. For You said, as recorded in Matthew 6:5, “When you pray, you are not to be like the hypocrites; for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and on the street corners so that they may be seen by men. Truly I say to you, they have their reward in full. 6 But you, when you pray, go into your inner room, close your door and pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you" (Jesus). In my opinion, worship is prayer and prayer is a form of worship, therefore, the words of the above text, from the Bible, can apply.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He said if he knew anything about his brother's son's actions of being "brainwashed" or radicalized, he would "be the first to report him." Well, he then goes on to say in 2009 his nephew's words bothered him and they seemed more radical by saying "I will do Allah's will," and he then called him, the uncle, an "infidel," well, why did he not report him? This is a complete contradiction. He is mentioning his nephew's association with a "radical mentor," so why did he not call the authorities? Also, he stated he had to return to America after having to do something overseas. Where was he and why was the trip necessary, but he is unable to share where he was and what he was doing? If it were a normal business trip why not say he was in "this country doing this;" why such secrecy? Now he says even the mother was turning more radical, but did he report her? Interesting.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Funny. I just noticed the notes describing this published report: drug and homelessness. I thought, wait, doesn't drug use create the homelessness? Now, nearly halfway through this special, the true crisis is being addressed: it is a drug issue that creates homelessness. Newsflash: Yes, we know this. So, hey Colorado and the rest of America, look at your (our) future. Also note, when "ghettos" looked like this, our nation remained in the "Dot.com" era. But guess what, our reality is the ghetto is on our nation's doorstep, opening the doors of the lovely homes and offices. Sad.
P. S. Wait! Seattle has all of those offenders and addicts on the streets as an abandoned well structured prison rest dormant in the city???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rick Sanchez: A mature educated person has the ability to share their point without criticism. If you disagree with me share your point. However, you use a You Tube comment post to issue a defamatory comment against me, who is someone you do not know; thus, actions like that are pathetic, and they are not worth reading. A mature approach conveys new information with me as in teaching me something new. What a sad example of a human being you are displaying due to your rude comment added at the end. Overall, it would be best to re-edit your comment and maybe we can conduct an educational dialogue where we are both able to learn new aspects of an opinion. In addition to this, you do not know me, hence, you do not have ANY right to blatantly use profanity in a way to belittle me simply because you do not agree with a two sentence comment, I wrote, concerning a 55 second synopsis seen in a video clip.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
david good, As intelligent as you think you are; I am (not “Im”) debating you. And note, two words, or one word with an apostrophe, is the correct way of expressing you are; the alternative is: you’re. So, let me say this, you probably need to find a new source to garner attention. Mind you, I am simply responding because your grammar skills have so overshadowed your point, it serves as an embarrassment against you. And guess what, “alot” is not a word: a lot. Because I care, I take the time to help you become a better person.😉!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This bakery is very creative and makes beautiful cakes. But maybe it is me, as much as I love the creations that can be created when using fondant, I do not like how unnatural that clay-like “food” looks. Again, yes, cakes look like beautiful artwork and the bakers are able to display their artistry. However, I think a baked cake should emulate a created baked combination of natural ingredients such as flour, sugar, eggs, butter, milk, and fruits. As an example, the Black Forest Cake. What a gorgeous creation that is, but it does not need that clay draped all over it to make it appealing, in my opinion.
Maybe I should adopt and honest question, could a baker make a volcano cake without using fondant? Could combined sugar creations and chocolates and other items like fruits be used to make a volcano cake?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So powerful. I am watching this because I watched a modern day show on various premier leagues, yesterday, and I thought I detected some weird looks between the owner and manager towards various players.
When watching the show, I noticed how the leaders seemed bonded with some players but avoided others, even by limiting their play time. As I looked at some expressions, I thought “I wonder if there is abuse, sexual grooming, involved in football?” On the show, I noticed certain looks and smiles from the owner and manager towards a few players on the show. And now, twenty hours later, I discovered this show. Now I think my thoughts were true.
So horrid. But this type of silent “grooming” is especially common in music, acting, and, now I know, it’s even in sport.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Cruzeoc101 , Low powered firearms are often described as rifles that are intermediate calibers.
However, attention bent on qualifying terms for an item that blows out a school’s door so a 28 year old angry lady can gain open access to use her high-powered firearms, equipped to facilitate mass casualties, causes me concern.
My initial reaction to your comment: ignore the ignorant. My next response involves discussing my opinionated desire to use the term “high powered” based on a weapon’s ballistics energy.
University of Utah states how cartridge data might be the real question. Basically, they explain “if the 44 magnum is compared with the 357 magnum, the effect of bore diameter is seen. The larger area of the 44 magnum creates more force with the same pressure, allowing the 44 magnum to produce more energy at the muzzle. The effect of case capacity can be demonstrated in a comparison of the 9 mm parabellum (para) with the 357 magnum. These cartridges have similar diameters and pressures, but the 357 magnum is much longer, yielding more case volume (more powder), and delivers more energy” (https://webpath.med.utah.edu/TUTORIAL/GUNS/GUNBLST.html). Based on this information, I suggest the term “energy” replicates—more closely—my purposefully used “high powered” weapon term. The chosen weapons by the assailant, Audrey Hale, packed high “energy” projectiles, in my opinion.
Of course your question is often used as a differential determining a gun enthusiast versus a typical “ban high powered weapons” social lobbyist. I am neither.
What I am, however, is a saddened American hurt by the news of my friends friends who have unexpectedly lost their lives when simply taking care of children in a church’s school building.
Sadly, in my US nation, most citizens grudgingly define the difference between the terms, low and high powered weapons, based solely on our shocked reactions as we watch and weep whilst witnessing children running in sheer panic as some gun owner brandishing semiautomatic assault weapons, with large capacity magazines packing extremely high velocity ballistics, dominating non-combative innocent people who are often simply trying to receive an education or offer an education to others that is often geared towards being better citizens striving to learn for the betterment of our country’s success. And THAT is the issue I sought and seek to address in my emotionally driven originally shared comment, which correlates more with the British reporter’s stance.
1
-
@Cruzeoc101 , The gun enthusiast you obviously are, I commend you for such knowledge. However, as stated in my message, I am “neither,” meaning I am not a gun enthusiast. Instead, my terminology is solely based on the energy of the projectile.
Now to address another fact, your loneliness seems to be evident. Conducting a conversation about a term in light of the true nature of my message: grief after learning of now murdered acquaintances, I suggest you find another dialogue to express and elevate your necessity to boast your weapons knowledge. I am more grieved that you would seek to debate terminology about firearms with an admitted non-gun novice, who is merely exercising patience and a desire to TRY to converse with you rather than equating your intelligence with ignorance, to elicit a weapons argument that elevates your internal insecurities. This act is simply embarrassing, in my experience.
Therefore, please feel free to engage your stance with another who prefers to tackle the qualifications associated with rifles. I am not that candidate.
But above all, relying upon assumptions based on faceless opinionated sites to justify and exercise your weaponry knowledge constitutes an elementary form of maturity. Time to discuss such matters with someone on your equal, meaning one as knowledgeable about guns. I don’t study the instruments used to kill my loved ones. I prefer to seek solutions to stop such acts from happening 130 times in 3 months, which I share as a refresher: the topic of my shared post.
How and why you fail to discuss that tragic reality indicates an ignorance that fails to justify conversing with you about ANYTHING pertaining to knowledge; if you lack empathy for the dead but defend cold metal, you lack the qualifications associated with humanity. Sorry.😢…🤢…🤮🤮🤮🤮
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hmmm??? In America’s judicial system, since when does our nation’s justice system put a shooter of a Black man in prison for “life without parole?” Oh, 🤔 I know, when a Black man is seen as a possible suspect: eg., when he is accused by a White friend—of the victim —who leaves the scene of his “good” friend’s shooting, as his good friend lays dying on stairs, but days later identifies a possible Black man as the suspect because of the man’s shaped eyes under a facial mask, at night; is considered the suspect who shot another drug dealing Black man in America.😉. Yup, those are the stated facts as heard in this episode.
And THAT is our form of justice in the “land of the free” where ALL citizens are treated equally. With cases like this and its outcome, we ARE progressing, slowly, but hopefully moving out of such a common disturbing manner of “equality.”
Final thought, men, ALL men, and really all humans, please, please, PLEASE leave any and ALL forms of criminal acts outside of your life.
As we have seen in this case, once again, the drug route, especially as an employer, certainly failed to provide this man any beneficial assets.
Live WISE!!!❤✌️
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Donna Kawana, And notice, folks feel the need to leave a comment and some seek to assume my nation but guess what has happened to those defending agents: No one shared a link to dismiss this notion: ABC In-depth seems to operate like racist.
So, again I say, every episode I have watched has NEVER shown a positive program highlighting a dark skin person or any persons of color. Oh, wait, I might be wrong. Yep, I think there was one episode. What was the plot? An Aboriginal man was honoring a European descendant, light skin, teacher who helped him earn his education; and we certainly cannot forget another potent fact: his life partner, his wife, was of Euro descent: she’s white.
So, ABC.....oh boy.....we see your message and it seems to tell this viewer you prefer to highlight only certain RACES...and all of them are solely light skinned faces!!!
1
-
MrArtyPants, Wait. I am nearly to the end and I see people dancing as the storyline continues to highlight the roots of Carnival: slavery. And a few other topics filled this report: crime levels; challenges; Venezuelans trying to “belong;” unemployment; and death. Yes, they are dancing and the music is lively, at the end. However, the only positive message I have heard came in the last minute: the people of Trinidad and Tobago are trying, or learning, to embrace......refugees in their somewhat troubled land. Not a very positive message in my mind. Now let me remind myself of other In-depth episodes: oh, and Australian 21 year old starts a campaign against polluted water and she influences so many that the entire region awarded her with an honorarium. And, husband has cancer but starts a foundation and keeps it running even until his death.
Yes, those stories have troubles. Yet, the subject matter, or the honored person, is draped in compelling inspiring reporting that tears begin to flow due to their sacrifice and exalted stamina.
Overall, you may not see the difference. But I do. Hence, please provide a link dispelling my original question: does ABC every show ANY positive stories about people of color? Preferably, made before this now global protest to embrace ALL races.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelwoodbodley8099 , Thanks. I guess this episode provided me some new information. After a brief time of research, I learned a few things about Naval terms.
According to the US Naval Institute, here are some interesting facts:
One of the quickest ways to establish yourself as a naval novice is to refer to a ship as a boat. Unfortunately, there is no absolute way to define the difference. However, some criteria can be applied to help those who care to try.
In general, a boat is a watercraft (for want of a better word) that is small enough to be carried on board a larger one, and that larger one is a ship. This is sometimes expressed this way: “A ship can carry a boat, but a boat can never carry a ship…Sometimes, when it is not clear whether we are dealing with a small ship or a big boat, the term “craft” is employed…Using the above guidance, submarines are technically ships. Yet they are traditionally referred to as boats.
The original submarines were very small and manned only when in use, so “boat” was appropriate. But as they developed into larger vessels—and rightfully should have been called ships—the original term stuck…When the large nuclear subs began to appear, there was an attempt by some submariners to start calling them ships, but as with many things in the Navy, tradition trumped logic, and today, all submarines—even the giant “boomers” (fleet ballistic-missile submarines)—are called boats.
But the Dictionary of Naval Terms (Naval Institute Press, 2005) defines “vessel” as “every description of craft, ship, or other contrivance used as a means of transportation on water.” Other dictionaries confirm the acceptability of this term, including Webster’s—“a watercraft bigger than a rowboat.” Perhaps most convincing of all is that “The Official Inventory of U.S. Naval Ships and Service Craft” is formally known as the “Naval Vessel Register.”
So, the bottom line is that vessel is an acceptable term in most naval circles” (https://www.usni.org › october › bl...Bluejacket's Manual - Of Ships and Boats and . . . | Naval History Magazine).
I learned something new today.😁
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So, the three ladies cases are all abuse cases, however, Dwayne gets "7 years;" Paul gets "13 months," and Lawrence is "out on bail." Umm, what is the difference? All three men grossly abused their partners. Why the different sentencing? I have to be honest, as I seek answers, do we dare bring skin tone into these verdicts? Why such different results please, anyone? In my opinion, those men are all repeat offenders and in my mind, they should be locked up and removed from society for LIFE!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Something I noticed, to this day, Africans (myself included) have accepted and embraced the title Black. Our skin is not black. We have been indoctrinated by this term to such an extent that we made it beautiful. We are people of various colors. And to see the so-called “white,” pale skinned people unleashing death on Africans due to their desire to accept their native homeland with pride, is horrific. Yes, such days are overtly over. However, such labeling is freely accepted and used. But in reality, such a label is entrenched in horrid prejudice.
May Africans embrace their beauty, intellect, skin tone, natural hair, and themselves as the beautifully created beings they were created to be!
Apartheid still exist, and sadly, in is displayed in the lifestyles of the native Africans. How? By the lack of acceptance of their culture, which has been so destroyed most native Africans cannot even decipher what is African.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How many geniuses are NOT “socially awkward?” I think it is sad, however, to learn of his intellect, yet his inability to garner this ability for a worthy contribution to society. His theories are not so far fetched; instead, they were governed by horrible levels of frustration and anger, in my opinion.
Dr. Grande, do you think his prison life (the solitude and structure) serve as a benefit for his diagnosis? His cabin life seemed to fuel his internal voices of anger. Yet, being in an enclosed small room, away from people, and free to read: i.e. a prison cell; seems to be nearly therapeutic for Ted. Although, I saw an interview documentary that plays his constant desire to enjoy the outdoors as he once had. But that same documentary seems to capture a somewhat jovial and relaxed side of Ted. Note, he is also probably medicated, which is indeed an aid in his ability to cope from a more “normal” perspective.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
As an American who was raised in poverty, I have always equated Thatcher with the President Reagan Republican politicians who worked earnestly for one segment of society that fits into one of all of three categories: the upper middle class, the wealthy, and especially those who were European descendants.
Today, as I watch this and other interviews of this leader, I appreciate aspects of her leadership including her focused steadfastness. Yet, I question if her views and policies included the plight of the many immigrants who were introduced and seduced by the United Kingdom’s (mythical inclusionary) ways because of the colonialism that invaded their native homelands.
Sadly, in other interviews, I sensed many of her “just get on with it” theories were set on her own family’s ways of existence and success. However, such logic qualifies as a ‘one size fits all’ approach for an entire population, or kingdom.
Please know that I deeply appreciate Thatcher’s candid comments and focus. However, I simply do not fully understand the British government. Therefore, could British people share and help me understand how she is seemingly elevated and adored now, but when in office, her policies seemed to cause social divide and a seemingly absent voice for the many ethnic groups under the United Kingdom’s leadership.
No argument intended. Please, no rude language and angry comments necessary. Please share your experience as those who have experienced living and surviving under Thatcher’s governance. Thank you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
FYI: I am watching a People Magazine Investigates episode called “The Freeway Phantom” (Season 4 Episode 4), the retelling of Washington DC’s possible first serial killer who snatched and killed young Black American girls. While watching it, something intriguing caught my attention and caused worry.
In that 1970s DC case, once the FBI finally took steps to help the local police find that city’s child murderer, who was murdering Black American girls in the early 1970s in the Washington DC area, they discovered “one green thread that was located on every victim…probably from the carpet of an automobile” (25:58 - 26:32 minute marker) during ‘their,’ the FBI’s, close examination of things that were possibly “looked over” (25:50 - 26:00 minute marker) by the local DC authorities in that child murderer’s case. The “green synthetic fiber” narrative is described nearly verbatim in both child abduction cases, and this is especially noticed in the People Magazine Investigate’s episode along with other stories about this case: i.e., CNN’s How it Really Happened: The Atlanta Serial Killer: Do You Know Where Your Children Are? Part 1 - 2 (“How It Really Happened” Season 5 Episode 1-2).
Well, if you remember, the same “green thread” evidence was found during the FBI’s investigation into this Atlanta Child Murders case, once their, the FBI’s, forensic team of experts conducted the examination of the Atlanta Child Murder’s victim’s evidence in that case, which were possibly overlooked by Atlanta’s local authorities. And remember, the “green thread” evidence in this case helped to break the Atlanta’s child murderer’s case and led to that city’s killer’s arrest.
Understand this, I don’t doubt the charged man, Wayne, might be linked. However, I find it extremely disturbing to hear that a “green thread” was found on the victims in both serial killer’s cases in the two serial killer cases involving abducted Black American children in two heavily populated Black American communities. Remember, once the thread was discovered, the case was soon shifted from investigating more suspects in an effort of gaining a resolution, to the case’s attention shifting to the FBI’s ability to ‘crack’ the case. Sadly, in the Washington DC case, the killer was never apprehended. But the Atlanta case was solved. Why? Discovered green thread.🤔JustAThought.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
After seeing this episode a few times, this time, I will address a common version of American Christianity
Detective Cox says, “Being the religious man that I am,” and sharing how he often “pray[s] for the victims.” Yet, his neighbors, whom the Bible instructs us to love, the Carrington family, describes Mr. Cox as being “rude…very rude.”
So, maybe we need to rethink advertising our righteousness because the Bible says, “Let another man’s…[human’s] lips praise you” (Proverbs 27:2). And Christ, who is the foundation of Christianity: i.e., Christ-like is the definition of Christian; Jesus said, “When you pray…go into your room, close the door, and pray to your father who is unseen, and your Father who sees what is done in secret will reward you” (Matthew 6:5-8).
Hmmm??? Yet another loop this viewer witnessed in this very baffling case.
1
-
1
-
Shmee150 There is an element of truth to that, but when we cannot hear the silence the car is famous for then you need to refrain from talking and let us experience the silence. Even thirty seconds of non-talking would be sufficient so we can hear the sound of the silence and hear the engine's sound. I stopped watching after skipping some so I could possibly hear the engine or the silence interior. Sadly, this did not work, so I wrote my message and only returned to your video when I read your response telling me people will "not watch if you stop talking." Well, at least one viewer stopped because you failed to stop talking, so there is only an element of truth in both stances. Here's a feasible solution: feel free to talk about the vehicle but also, PLEASE, provide a few moments of silence, please. You are advertising a vehicle not talking about your life; at least that's why this viewer viewed the clip: to see and learn about the car and, sadly, not you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I watched the segment and her show being cancelled, because of her sharing her opinion, seems outlandish to me. I am a dark skin American who was not offended. I cannot speak for all people, but, in my opinion, this so called "controversy" spreads racism. If they cancelled the show because she made negative comments about Kent University, or the school in England that she condemned due to their policies on costumes, then I would understand the offense, somewhat. However, this cancellation due to her mentioning not understanding why a lady was considered offensive towards others because she darkened her skin tone for a one day costume event is certainly not grounds for being terminated. Thus, the cancellation generates and creates a negative bias towards those they claim are offended, or the people of color. In turn, they have now turned her simple comment into a topic that fuels anger. In other words, this is an ongoing tactic, by the media that dominates this society, to stir negative attitudes towards people groups. Why did they not cancel the show due to her speaking out about Kent University or college? Why did they not cancel the show due to the Nazi comment? Therefore I ask, why did they cancel the show due to her asking why someone offended others because she darkened her skin to look like Diana Ross?
So, here is my take on this matter: I call your bluff media execs, sorry, you are the racist who seek to stir controversy in order to acquire more money and viewership. Therefore, stop attacking the Black race!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, now I am curious. Ketchup defined: a smooth sauce made chiefly from tomatoes and vinegar, used as a condiment; Origin: late 17th century: apparently from Chinese (Hokkien) kê-chiap ‘brine of pickled fish or shellfish’, perhaps partly via Malay kecap, kicap ‘soy sauce’” (Oxford Languages Dictionary). And “catchup \ ˈke-chəp , ˈka- \ or catsup \ ˈke-chəp , ˈka- , ˈkat-səp…History and Etymology
borrowed, directly or via Malay kecap (phonetically kətʃap) "fish sauce," from Southern Min (Chinese dialects of southeast Fujian) kôe-chiap (Xiamen), kê-chiap (Zhangzhou), from kôe, kê "salted or pickled fish or shellfish" + chiap "juice, sap"” (Merriam-Webster Dictionary).
Can’t find the mushrooms connection. Interesting new info, however.👍
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The entire continent of Africa has the fatal flaw of disunity. Therefore, we continue to see the native Africans as they are content with destroying their own people as outsiders come in and enslave and entice them, in their disunited mindset, as the outsiders then cultivate, distribute, and strip their entire continent of EVERY naturally rich resource the place houses.
And I’m talking EVERY natural resource in the land: from minerals to humans; seas; and their now grossly polluted air, in some regions, are stripped and even removed from Africa.
Notice how the OUTSIDER is showing us these African tribes rather than AFRICANS creating educational videos and boasting of their historic and LASTING African communities on their continent.
Get it??? Horrible.
Again, all of this happens as the African people rape, torture, rob, and kill EACH OTHER!!! The outside force is less hostile towards them than their own citizens are towards each other. And I cannot pity them. THAT is simply horrifically sad.
I was on that continent some years ago. Every where I went, I PLEADED with the African to TAKE BACK YOUR LAND and UNIFY YOURSELVES!
Twenty-plus years later, what do we see???
Great video.
However, I guess this Person of Color just wishes an African was hosting this tour of their fellow tribes in THEIR HOMELANDS.😢
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He probably did not display ANY schizophrenic behavior patterns in elementary school. I would think the stress of the neuroscience studies he encountered, possibly living alone in Colorado without normal support, and the fact that he had a mental illness which becomes evident in the early to mid-twenties all contributed to his actions. The sad thing is a schizo 'outbreak,' so to speak, can run its course and some folks can make it to the other side of the outbreak, if they do not harm themselves or others. However, in this case, his outbreak caused horrid damage to others. A prime example of my comment is found in the late Great John Nash, one of only a few people who survived his schizo episode without harming, physically, himself or others; he went on to live a great productive life after his nearly fifteen year 'outbreak.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here's an opinion: LAPD, an encryption for The KKK! Here's an irony: they discuss how Donner is a narcissist because he thinks everyone is against him and he is a victim. But the LAPD claims, he was against us as his former employees, just as Rodney King, was against "us," and countless OTHERS "were against us," because THEY are the victims. Oh, and "he chose the way out," why, because he did not allow the police to kill him; they call that cowardly. See that resemblance??? I don't respect Donner; no. However, the actions of the LAPD and this prejudice account, contained in this show, is pathetic and causes me to see racial bias rather than pity!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Come on! I lived in Nashville for twenty years and that city was a beautiful city with a lot of peace. Now they are developing the city, destroying the old lasting aspects of maintaining relations with others and holding on to a lasting faith in God, and chasing the almighty dollar by building and building a cosmopolitan city. Therefore, the evidence in such an advancement stirs strife, coveting, competition, and in many cases violence becomes a norm as it is found in every other overcrowded city. So, Nashville officials, you have created this metropolis, thus, now you must deal with the typical aspects of a modern capitalist society. Sad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Kevin S. It is a sad situation. Racial bias, cultural condemnation, and grown (immigrant) offspring (Trump: ask thyself where DID my parents come from?), these people are commonly called "adults;" however, their childish bander is being generated by using a social, one hundred and forty something character, site to unleash rude slurs towards other ethnic groups; and, in Roseanne's case, this woman has even come against her own people. Such behavior is childish and simply must be thoroughly rejected as a norm. Seriously, if schools come against bullies who practice this form of aggression than we, as a society, must come together and put an end to such acts.
1
-
Robert Teixeira: The New York Times May 28, 2018 "After Racist Tweet, Roseanne Barr’s Show Is Canceled by ABC" article excerpt:
As viewers flocked to “Roseanne,” Ms. Barr returned to Twitter. One of Ms. Barr’s messages accused a survivor of the high school shooting in Parkland, Fla., of giving a Nazi salute; another involved a conspiracy theory about Mr. Trump quietly breaking up a child sex trafficking ring including prominent Democrats. “You can’t control Roseanne Barr,” Mr. Sherwood said in an interview with The New York Times in March, when asked about her Twitter account. “Many who have tried have failed.”
But there were other sources of controversy.
The revival’s third episode featured a joke about two ABC comedies with diverse casts, “black-ish” and “Fresh Off the Boat.” Ms. Barr’s character and her husband, Dan, played by John Goodman, wake up on the their living room couch, having fallen asleep in front of the television. “We missed all the shows about black and Asian families,” Dan Conner said. To laughter from the show’s studio audience, Roseanne Conner responded, “They’re just like us. There, now you’re all caught up.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rocketsfan6116 , Nope. I don’t have to. I was not raised in any religion or church. I cannot stand a LOT of religious practices to this day. I have, however, asked God and Jests if they were real as I contemplated my own death. My life is completely different since that night in the 80s. A dedicated belief in God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit is really not pasted down from parents or others. A solid belief in God stems from the relational bond he offers those who believe.
One thing I have noticed, your response are directed at my belief in God rather than simply scrolling past my comments, especially when you believe, let me get this straight, you believe I believe something that you reject. So you are asking me to question my belief in God because YOU have no belief in God. Hmmm??? For one who does not accept God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit as truth, you seem to have some knowledge about God, albeit bad or good. Why are you therefore asking ME to question why I believe??? What is that important to you simply because you do not share the same beliefs?
1
-
@rocketsfan6116 , Gosh. Public discussion to cause ME to qualify MY beliefs. Sorry, I sense and interrupt your form of discussion as controlling, which is an extremely common practice by many RELIGIOUS people. But guess what? It’s a big world. Everyone has free choice. I choose my faith. If you believe in a God of free choice, like, the biblical God and not forced religion, you would freely allow me to share MY experience without expecting me to fulfill your wishes. The freedom of choice Jesus has instilled in me allows me to respect others enough to let them choose what they choose to believe WITHOUT trying to make them believe what I believe. I’m not their God.❤️
P. S. This is my last response. I’m not striving to make ANYONE believe my beliefs. I shared my pain, publicly, after seeing the horrible video. Death is horrific, especially unexpected tragedies. From my experience, I run TO God and ask him why, and based on my experience, ONLY The LORD gives me the strength to digest the horrors we must encounter on this earth. And I am not speaking of accepting such horrors with some plastic ‘faith-based’ happiness. No, for even Jesus wept when encountering the pain of death on this realm. Videos like this therefore reinforces in me the fact that this world is in a fallen state.😥😩😭…😞🙏✝️
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wait. Off topic, but related to milking a cow at night.
I am relieved. Why? Because I just weighed myself, in the mid-day, and I am heavier than I was the other morning.
However, the shared wisdom, from Max’s research, MIGHT alleviate my concern, for within a few days, the morrow’s morning weigh-in could potentially reduce my fatness to resume an acceptable welcoming amount of weight.
And to think, such knowledge was absorbed as I spontaneously decided to watch an older video of a treat I have NEVER tried, but heard of many times, despite my body’s inability to process ANY dairy products.
From a viewer of this older day’s video, I say thank you Max for your informative well researched take on sharing recipes with us out in YouTube land!🏅
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sad. Sad stuff. Why? Because most of those children we witnessed in this piece, if living, are still preaching the same things as their interviewed forefathers once declared, now, nearly fifty years….later.
Ninety percent after “independence,” but the dependence on weed replaces dem strength. So the interviewed father’s son, young “Nesta” da prophet, still proclaims the lasting legacy of this tragic land:
Welcome to Jamrock…Out in the streets they call it murder…Come on let's face it, a ghetto education's basic
And most ah de youths them waste it; And when dem waste it, that's when dem take the guns replace it; Then dem don't stand a chance at all…Welcome to Jamrock; Out in the streets they call it murder” (Songwriters: Damian Robert Nesta Marley / Ini Kamoze / Stephen Marley; Welcome to Jamrock lyrics © Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC, Universal Music Publishing Group).
Absolutely horrible. Extremely sad to watch for this dark skinned viewer.🥺😞😢😭😭😭!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I tried but had to turn this off, and not because of the journalism. Honestly, too much immaturity for adults. No offense, but they are ALL a mess! Going to church—for whatever reason despite doing things typical sermons preach against—with the man you say, “When it’s over, it’s over,” but you still converse with this man who you once vowed to stay with “in good and bad…sickness and health…till death do us part,” but you are now dating another man whom you just meet, was it when she was with her childcare worker😵💫; and, you now need this BABYSITTER to drive you to see your current boyfriend because your soon to be divorced husband is upset with your boyfriend….or some weird childish drama like that??? And the soon to be ex-husband’s mad at the new boyfriend, so they all agree to meet on a dark street??? 😬😲😵💫I think?
All this mess sounds like some High School Musical movie plot that often factionalizes schoolhouse cafeteria drama. But these are adults??? These are professionals??? These are parents??? 😢😢😢Really??? Too much for me. Let’s focus our well earned journalistic skills on more enlightening and substantially socially beneficial topics.😉
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It hits me: the spied on Russians contact the FBI to tell them, hey, you know you have a spy??? ALL of the years of “counter intelligence” and “secret” tunnels evaporate as the Russians expose an FBI spy TO the FBI. Got that??? And what becomes of it.
Well, the covert work begins, the spy is identified, and caught as THE “covert” agent used to expose the spy decides to sell his “covert” story to Hollywood, leaves the nation’s federal investigation agency to do book tours, television, radio, and podcast interviews and eventually became a wealthy book circuit attorney all because he helped “reveal” a handed over FBI spy TO the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Is this an ‘only in America’ rags to riches story or should we bow our heads in embarrassment because our spied on foes were the ones who informed our highly esteemed investigation agency that one of THEM, a federal investigation agent, has been used by us, your foes, as an informant for telling us how you have been spying on us; do we laugh or do we cry???
I am baffled. Honestly. I really am.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here's an added interesting fact. It seems our illegal immigration issue seems to focus the most on our southwest boarder.
However, according to a Pew Research report, "Mexicans may no longer be the majority of U.S. unauthorized immigrants. They made up half of all unauthorized immigrants in 2016, according to the Center’s preliminary estimate, marking the first time in at least a decade that they did not account for a clear majority of this population. Their numbers (and share of the total) have been declining in recent years: There were 5.6 million Mexican unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. in 2015 and 2016, down from 6.4 million in 2009. Meanwhile, the number of unauthorized immigrants from nations other than Mexico has grown since 2009, from 5 million that year to 5.4 million in 2015. Non-Mexicans numbered 5.7 million in the preliminary 2016 estimate, a total that was not statistically different from 2015. From 2009 to 2015, the number of unauthorized immigrants from Asia and Central America rose. Increases in the number from other countries have mostly offset the decline in the number from Mexico (and a relatively small decrease in the number from South America)" (Pew Research 10.3.16).
Based on a 2016 article by a Newsweek affiliate, Latin Times report, this reality has been an issue commonly overlooked when discussing the illegal immigrant:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now estimates 93,000 Canadian overstays, more than double the amount of Mexican overstays (42,000) and about the same as the combined total of South America America (Cedar Attanasi: 2018 Newsweek Media Group).
So why such a disparity? Probably because "Canadians have a higher median income, are less likely to live in poverty, and are more likely to have health insurance and to be college educated. They are significantly older, on average, than the overall immigrant and U.S.-born populations" as Elijah Alperin and Jeanne Batalova reported in a 2018 article for the Migration Policy Institute (6.7.2018). Yet, according to the same article, "In 2017, Canadians living abroad, whether in the United States or other country, sent approximately US $1.3 billion in remittances...[a sum of money sent, especially by mail, in payment for goods or services or as a gift (Google)]
to Canada via formal channels, according to World Bank data" (Migration Policy Institute 6.7.2018).
So, let's check our policies based on the treatment ALL illegal immigrants must be subjected to so that we can truly justify the treatment addressed in this post. Thus, here's my question: is this treatment practiced on our northern boarders, as well, to PROTECT our society?
P. S. Here's the reality, who has been hiring and reaping a fat tax-free/reduced income benefits based on employing these so-called illegals??? Who is the TRUE illegal in this reality???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Okay, I have to think through this quoted title, “White American supremacist.” Any American with European roots probably needs to rethink history. These so-called “supremacist” are the people who are the offspring of those who captured Africans and brought them to this land, correct? Are these not the offspring of White American forefathers (and foremothers: to be gender inclusive) who could not clean their homes, farm their lands, pick their crops, build their homes, build their town halls, construct lasting monuments such as the White House, and tend to their children? Aren’t these the offspring of those who integrated this land with Africans after they immigrated to this one time pristine nation, from Europe??? What “supremacy?”
1
-
1
-
1
-
“I haven’t used that word…[the “N” word] in 20 years!” Well you accused them, arrested them, and they were convicted of the crimes 25 years ago.😕
And by the way, the non-racist officer, failed to call them men every time he spoke of them. Instead, the paid “civil servant” resorted to calling them the inhuman label, “Blacks.” So, yes, following his lead, white, that IS seeing people through a racial lens. 😢!
May the Lord himself settle the score in this so-called Christian nation.😢😢😢
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Interesting. As I listen to this, I have a few thoughts based on my experiences. Please do not comment on my post. These are my thoughts, which are not facts! I only write them to express my feelings without ruminating on them without a release. Don’t like my words, please scroll down and read someone else’s thoughts.
He said the profound statements don’t come (solely) from “Nelson Mandela or Martin Luther King or Winston Churchill.” Meaning, each person and child has their own profound perspective.
But then he says, later in the interview, how surfing produces an ability to endure and persevere; in essence he is saying, the waves of the sea serve as a great instructor of endurance.
The problem I have whilst I listen to this video is based on the three people he named and then honors the sea as a place to learn endurance and perseverance through hardships.
Well, two of the three mentioned great men, who exemplified strength and endurance, weren’t even allowed to walk the surf line on beaches in their homelands, let alone surf. So, this surfer has a perspective. However, it reflects a very provided for existence that has not been shaped by inflicted pain from his fellow citizens.
Some don’t have the luxury of riding waves to learn endurance. In fact, life has offered the waves that strive to wipe them out via mankind. But despite such opposition, they persevered as their bodies endured the consistent battering the ocean—called mankind—inflicted on their external and internal bodies, via physical battering and mental and emotional torture. Yet their words still remain as a testament of their ability to endure and remain strong in the midst of their ragging seas.
Therefore, our life experiences can be used to help us and others. But learning from those, especially the three men mentioned, who have endured severe hardships and have gone before us, provide for us the strength and template to scribe our words of wisdom, in which others might find helpful as their life’s stories unfold.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Whoa.😲! What did I hear? The court overturned Marty’s conviction and he is released. Yet, the same court set a million dollar bail on the guy??? What did I miss?😵💫.
So….🤔….why was his case overturned; shouldn’t that suspension serve as the overturned conviction and the bail fees???🤔! I could be wrong.
So wait, now that he was acquitted, were the persons reimbursed for that million dollar bail expense they paid???
On a side note, as I listen to the end of this long ordeal, Marty, with all due respect, I honestly think you should leave that horrible case alone, if you are able. You dedicated enough of your life to that injustice, again, in my opinion.🎊
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Diversity embraced and encouraged by a homogeneous group is a self-satisfying altruistic way of warding off internal, individually and collectively, homogeneously defined racism. Defining racism from an external perspective, of privilege and power, is as the old CSN&Y tune proclaims, “To sing the blues, you’ve gotta pay the dues.” They do not have a clue, and most accurately, or a desire to embrace change! Notice how the Harvard president preached the “inclusive diversity” message, and then swiftly resigned before it was implemented. And no, folks who were in place during this and the other mentioned incidents are not committed to change even if they are elevated to high positions. How do we examine this as truth: they were not asked or presented an ultimatum to leave. Get it???
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I watched the segment and her show being cancelled, because of her sharing her opinion, seems outlandish to me. I am a dark skin American who was not offended. I cannot speak for all people, but, in my opinion, this so called "controversy" spreads racism. If they cancelled the show because she made negative comments about Kent University, or the school in England that she condemned due to their policies on costumes, then I would understand the offense, somewhat. However, this cancellation due to her mentioning not understanding why a lady was considered offensive towards others because she darkened her skin tone for a one day costume event is certainly not grounds for being terminated. Thus, the cancellation generates and creates a negative bias towards those they claim are offended, or the people of color. In turn, they have now turned her simple comment into a topic that fuels anger. In other words, this is an ongoing tactic, by the media that dominates this society, to stir negative attitudes towards people groups. Why did they not cancel the show due to her speaking out about Kent University or college? Why did they not cancel the show due to the Nazi comment? Therefore I ask, why did they cancel the show due to her asking why someone offended others because she darkened her skin to look like Diana Ross?
So, here is my take on this matter: I call your bluff media execs, sorry, you are the racist who seek to stir controversy in order to acquire more money and viewership. Therefore, stop attacking the Black race!!!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I tried to watch this without judging. I wrote a long opinionated stance, which I deleted. Therefore, I will only say this: before the exploitation of the Europeans, this area as were MANY areas, around the WORLD, were richly packed beautiful countries FULL of unadulterated natural resources. These areas were populated with hardworking people who lived in harmony with their land. Then the outsiders arrived. They established their horrific standards, which are ALWAYS embedded and controlled by their civilized force governed by their natural resource: GREED! Now, on a global scale, nearly EVERY area where the European race once tried to live is now stripped societies and defined, by the European race, as “impoverished“ lands filled with destitute populations that simply cannot reach the European standard of living, which happens to be defined as wealthy civilized communities....mind you, by European people. THIS is the sickening reality this entire world must face! P. S. I tried to contain myself but I simply had to address this stance after hearing this host continuously use debilitating words to describe the people of this land despite his effort to expose, or address (mildly) the HORROR unleashed on these people by “colonialism.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1