Comments by "Connor" (@connor5669) on "Why Not Identify As A Dog! - Richard Dawkins on Transgender u0026 J K Rowling" video.

  1. Rowling said numerous things about trans people that are deeply offendsive. And you simply agree with her
    5
  2. @Dapryor  on 7/5/2020 she claimed that trans medical care is a "new form of conversion therapy" and that it is "driven by homophobia." As a trans and gay person, I find that deeply misinformed at best. On 12/12/21, Rowling called trans women "the penised individuals." I find it pretty disgusting to reduce our personhood to our genetalia. We're human beings, not walking genitals. There are many examples, not to mention her support for people who advocate for violence against trans people (like Kellie Jay Keen).
    1
  3.  @Dapryor  eagerly awaiting how you'll say it's totally okay to refer to human beings as nothing but their genitals
    1
  4.  @peterschaeffer  She implied with no evidence that we're predators. She called trans women "p*nised individuals." She said that trans women aren't women. She aligns herself with extremists like Posie Parker.
    1