Comments by "Gen Ohmni" (@KingOhmni) on "The Kerch Strait Bridge Bombing Ticks us Closer to Midnight and Armageddon" video.

  1.  @fatefinger  maybe because they are not interested in territorial gains but grinding down the enemy in a war of attrition. Ukraine has lost a far greater amount of men and equipment.
    11
  2.  @VallornDeathblade  It’s almost as if Russia care more about personnel than equipment. Also when the Yanks pull out of places like they do its a big fat meh from me re equipment left behind. What is telling are zkiev demands for ever more NATO toys. Almost as if they are hurting for hardware or something. Something that my initial point shows the Russians are not imo.
    8
  3.  @VallornDeathblade  say I accept that Russia is being forced to field 60s era tanks, which I don’t, Ukraine is fielding tanks made in the 50s via latest ex warsaw pact donations. So what now? Russia has or can deploy T 90s and Terminator urban assault vehicles. But if Ukraine is consistently forced to field outdated tanks and IFVs why bother all that much if you can work through your own outdated stock but still be generationally further on than the opponenet? Finally if you wanna talk massive losses let’s talk about Ukraine and NATO atocks eh?
    7
  4.  @VallornDeathblade  now you are simply reaching. There was no begging, there was a deal struck betwix nations. That’d be like me saying Ukraine is begging for weapons. Oh wait a minute…. Oh and the fact Iranian drones appear to be more effective than the Yank switchblades is kinda embarrassing. More so given it shows just how effective Iranian sanctions have being. Now. How are the the Russian sanctions faring? They seem to be backfiring to this Briton.
    6
  5. At this point I feel increasingly vindicated in my initial stance of let Ukraine stand on it’s own. I’d wager the stituation would already be resolved and the west would not be committing economic suicide. But hey, we all know the globaloids invested way too much into their puppet government to not keep escalating the situation. I also agree with Styx that Ukraine is being loured out of their entrenched positions so they can blown away with bombs and artillery.. I however don’t think Putin will do the F Ukraine civvies thing. Primary (stated) reason for going in at all was to stop the persecution of ethnic and Russian speaking Ukrainians by Kiev government. Further most Russians have family in Ukraine. So not sure Putin would go full conquest mode given the collateral. That said. Chechnya…
    2
  6.  @Shiftinggers  what a load of BS. Fun fact. Russia has an entire city that is dedicated to munitions manufacturing and it supplies 1/5th of the worlds supply of everything from .22 all the way to artillery shells. You’ve been swilling that MSM koolaid, aint ya?
    1
  7.  @jacquesstrapp3219  Says the person engaging in being an arm chair general. You do realise the legal constraints a SMO entails? They cannot just attack any old position like we did in Gulf War II during the shock and awe phase. Ruskies have being fighting with one hand tied behind their backs by the optics minded Putin. Plus most of the actual fighting has being done either by Wagner, DPR/LPR militia or Chechnyans. RF is basically providing artillery and missile support. But muh Russian forces are doing sooo badly. Now, how many nations have assisted in Ukraine's defense? Be it via mercs (naughty if you ask me), via lethal military aid and or financial aid? Let's say a nice round 50. Russia meanwhile? Barring a drone deal with Iran I aint exactly seeing anything other than diplomatic support from Brics economies and some sane western politicians. Although the recent flex by the Belarusian Defense Ministry re 500k reservists paints an interesting picture going forward. Anyway. Logistics issues? Big whoop, I'm currently rereading Stalingrad by Antony Beevor. I would swear the Russians do best under pressure. Besides, until the Kerch bridge bombing I do not for one second accept Russia faced significant logistics issues, more so once it withdrew from Northern Ukraine to focus on the Donbas and Mariupol. To add to that the further the AFU advances the longer their logistics lines become longer and the shorter the Russians. So it logically does not add up that Russia will be facing worse logistics issues than it's adversary. Be interesting to see how the autumn rains work out for both sides. Advantage defender imo and right now AFU is on the offense whereas RF is on the defense. It's almost strategic thinking vs tactical thinking or something. On top of that the Ruskies, despite that famous 10 days of ammo MSM nonsense, have had no issues in raining shells and small arms fire on the AFU. Regional issues? Welll they just got to annex between 15 and 20% of Ukraines landmass off the back of a referendum so not sure what you mean unless Kharkiv region. In that case, the term punching thin air aprings to mind. It cost AFU how much to capture that area Vs what? Photos of military hardware? Not much of a win imo. Maintenance? You ever tried maintaining western over designed shite in da field as opposed to ex Warsaw/USSR/Russian stuff? I aint but I do have examples of both sides in ww2 and messed around with more modern items a couple times. The slav jank just works. Hell if anything the latest AK iteration is stepping away from the foundational premise of the AK. Anyone can shoot it and anyone can maintain it. So maybe you have a point there but I still would wager the hodge podge AFU army has much worse maintenance issues than RF. They have everything from 1950s era tanks to captured T-90s for example. And some want to give them NATO produced tanks? Asking for trouble there. I'm a professional chef BTW :P You want the best steak you've ever had? Get me to cook it for you.
    1