Comments by "K Parker" (@kparker2430) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. The Hossenfelder technique of kneeing academia in the nuts is compelling (evidenced by the subs). Science of the money, by the money, for the money, is science hijacked.
    2
  2. This sort of thing only serves to undermine my faith in educated experts. As a standard fool, I am not in a position to weigh and judge my experts. I actually need another expert to do that (Sabine). This exposes me to the sort of risk I suffered in ever believing ( who is that English pretty boy Dr. Brian Cox?); First he convinced me of the big bang and the age of the cosmos. Then he changed the deal as new facts emerged, and now the new deal is all the old deal was wrong. WTF! bullshit for a decade and expect to be 'understood with sympathy' later on. And what about Ed Witten (?) the string theory expert? They come, they bullshit and they vanish. Currently in Clown World heading for Idiocracy, the world is turning to shit and we have scientists like the maniacs at CERN seeing 'what happens if...". I reckon we should piss it all off and go back to simple magic. The sort of stuff an everyday Joe can achieve with aged urine and the beak of a crow.
    1
  3. but she did say 'fuck' at least once; i anchor myself on the things i understand.
    1
  4. I'm about what should be, more than what is. That is not absurd, if one considers that the narrative must precede the science. The narrative is crap. I propose starting with; if the universe is sensible there must be FTL speed or wormholes or there is no point, further investigation into a non sensible universe will lead to non sensible facts, like what physicists are peddling, confusion.
    1